Feminismos, teorias queer e o estudo arqueológico de sexualidades passadas

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20396/rap.v16i1.8666176

Palavras-chave:

Gênero, Teoria queer, Feminismo, História da Arqueologia

Resumo

A Arqueologia enfrenta o desafio singular de esticar as teorias sociais da sexualidade em novas direções cronológicas e metodológicas. Este ensaio utiliza uma análise de práticas citacionais para considerar como as teorias queer e feminista se articulam com investigações arqueológicas sobre sexualidade. Tanto a teoria queer quanto as práticas arqueológicas feministas aparecem como ferramentas poderosas que podem ser usadas para expandir interpretações arqueológicas de gênero e sexualidade.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Barbara L. Voss , Stanford University

I am a historical archaeologist who studies the dynamics and outcomes of transnational cultural encounters: How did diverse groups of people, who previously had little knowledge of each other, navigate the challenges and opportunities of abrupt and sustained interactions caused by colonialism, conflict, and migration? I approach this question through fine-grained, site-specific investigations coupled with broad-scale comparative and collaborative research programs. My earlier work investigated Spanish colonization of the Americas, an area of research that I continue to be involved in. My current research focuses on 19th century migration from southern China, which I am investigating through four interrelated projects: (1) the Market Street Chinatown Archaeology Project (2002-present), a community-based research program developed to study and interpret the history and archaeology of San Jose’s first Chinese community; (2) the interdisciplinary Chinese Railroad Workers of North America Project (2012-present), for which I serve as Director of Archaeology; (3) Research Cooperation on Home Cultures of 19th Century Overseas Chinese, a collaboration with Wuyi University to develop ethnohistoric and archaeological research on qiaoxiang (home villages) in Kaiping County, Guangdong; and (4) the Arboretum Chinese Labor Quarters Project (2018-present), a study of historic Chinese workers’ residences on Stanford campus lands. Throughout, my research is guided by a deep commitment to public archaeology and collaborative research. Additionally, I continue to work to generate a productive dialogue between queer studies and archaeology, and to develop rigorous methodologies that support the study of sexuality and gender through archaeological evidence.

Lídia dos Santos Ferreira de Freitas , Universidade Federal de Goiás

Graduada em Letras-Inglês pela Universidade Federal de Goiás. Doutoranda em Antropologia Social pela Universidade Federal de Goiás.

Camila Azevedo de Moraes Wichers, Universidade Federal de Goiás

Bacharelado em Museologia da Faculdade de Ciências Sociais da Universidade Federal de Goiás (FCS/ UFG). Professora Adjunta do Departamento de Museologia da Universidade Federal de Goiás, no Programa de Pós-Graduação em Antropologia Social (PPGAS/FCS/UFG). Ser-Tão - Núcleo de Estudos e Pesquisas em Gênero e Sexualidade (FCS/UFG).

Referências

Bahn, P. G. 1992. Review of engendering archaeology. Journal of Gender Studies, 1: 338–44.

Balme, J. and Beck, W. (eds) 1995. Gendered Archaeology: The Second Australian Women in Archaeology Conference. Canberra: Australian National University Publications.

Bayer, R. 1989. Private Acts, Social Consequences: AIDS and the Politics of Public Health. New York: The Free Press.

Berlant, L. and Freeman, E. 1993. Queer nationality. In Fear of a Queer Planet: Queer Politics and Social Theory (ed. M. Warner). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 193–229.

Berube, A. 1996. The history of gay bathhouses. In Policing Public Sex (ed. D. Bedfellows). Boston, MA: South End Press, pp. 187–221.

Bland, L. and Doan, L. (eds) 1998. Sexology in Culture: Labeling Bodies and Desires. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Brumfiel, E. M. 1991. Weaving and cooking: women’s production in Aztec Mexico. In Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory (eds J. M. Gero and M. W. Conkey). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, pp. 224–54.

Brumfiel, E. 1992. Distinguished lecture in archaeology: breaking and entering the ecosystem – gender, class, and faction steal the show. American Anthropologist, 91: 551–67.

Butler, J. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. New York: Routledge. Butler, J. 1993a. Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of ‘Sex’. London: Routledge.

Butler, J. 1993b. Imitation and gender insubordination. In: The Lesbian and Gay Studies Reader (eds H. Abelove, M. A. Barale and D. Halperin). New York: Routledge, pp. 307–20.

Claassen, C. P. 1991. Gender, shellfishing, and the shell mound archaic. In Engendering Archae- ology: Women and Prehistory (eds J. M. Gero and M. W. Conkey). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, pp. 276–300.

Claassen, C. (ed.) 1992a. Exploring Gender through Archaeology: Selected Papers from the 1991 Boone Conference. Madison, WI: Prehistory Press.

Claassen, C. 1992b. Questioning gender: an introduction. In Exploring Gender through Archaeology:

Selected Papers from the 1991 Boone Conference (ed. C. Claassen). Madison, WI: Prehistory Press, pp. 1–10.

Claassen, C. and Joyce, R. A. (eds) 1997. Women in Prehistory: North America and Mesoamerica. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Conkey, M. W. and Gero, J. 1991. Tensions, pluralities, and engendering archaeology: an introduc- tion to women and prehistory. In Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory (eds J. M. Gero and M. W. Conkey). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, pp. 3–30.

Conkey, M. W. and Gero, J. 1997. From programme to practice: gender and feminism in archae- ology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 26: 411–37.

Conkey, M. W. and Spector, J. D. 1984. Archaeology and the study of gender. Advances in Archaeo- logical Method and Theory, 7: 1–32.

Conkey, M. W. and Tringham, R. E. 1995. Archaeology and the goddess: exploring the contours of feminist archaeology. In Feminisms in the Academy (eds D. C. Stanton and A. J. Stewart). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 199–247.

Conkey, M. W. with Williams, S. H. 1991. Original narratives: the political economy of gender in archaeology. In Gender at the Crossroads of Knowledge: Feminist Anthropology in the Postmodern Era (ed. M. d. Leonardo). Berkeley: University of California Press, pp. 102–39.

Conkey, M. W. and Wylie, A. 1999. Summary of ‘Doing archaeology as a feminist: moving from theory to practice’. Newsletter of the Women in Archaeology Interest Group, Society for American Archaeology, 1(2): 3–4.

Crimp, D. and Rolston, A. 1990. AIDS Demo Graphics. Seattle: Bay Press.

Dangerous Bedfellows (eds) 1996. Policing Public Sex: Queer Politics and the Future of AIDS Activism. Boston, MA: South End Press.

De Lauretis, T. 1991. Queer theory: lesbian and gay sexualities: an introduction. Differences, 3(2): iii–xviii.

Deagan, K. (ed.) 1983. Spanish St. Augustine: The Archaeology of a Colonial Creole Community. New York: Academic Press.

Du Cros, H. and Smith, L. (eds) 1993. Women in Archaeology: A Feminist Critique. Canberra: Department of Prehistory, The Australian National University.

Duggan, L. 1995. The discipline problem: queer theory meets lesbian and gay history. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 2(3): 179–92.

Duggan, L. and Hunter, N. D. (eds) 1995. Sex Wars: Sexual Dissent and Political Culture. New York: Routledge.

Ehrenberg, M. 1989. Women in Prehistory. London: British Museum Publications.

Foucault, M. 1978. The History of Sexuality, Vol. I: An Introduction (trans. Robert Hurley). New York: Pantheon.

Gero, J. M. 1988. Gender bias in archaeology: here, then, and now. In: Feminism within the Science and Health Care Professions: Overcoming Resistance (ed. S. V. Rosser). New York: Pergamon Press, pp. 33–43.

Gero, J. 1991. Genderlithics: women’s roles in stone tool production. In: Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory (eds J. M. Gero and M. W. Conkey). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, pp. 163–93.

Gero, J. M. and Conkey, M. W. (eds) 1991. Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

Gibb, J. G. and King, J. A. 1991. Gender, activity areas, and homelots in the 17th century Chesa- peake region. Historical Archaeology, 25(4): 109–31.

Gilchrist, R. 1994. Gender and Material Culture: The Archaeology of Religious Women. New York: Routledge.

Gilchrist, R. 1999. Gender and Archaeology: Contesting the Past. London: Routledge. Grosz, E. A. 1989. Sexual Subversions: Three French Feminists. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.

Grosz, E. A. and Probyn, E. (eds) 1995. Sexy Bodies: The Strange Carnalities of Feminism. London: Routledge.

Hanen, M. P. and J. Kelley 1992. Gender and archaeological knowledge. In: Metaarchaeology (ed. L. Embree). Boston, MA: Reidel, pp. 195–227.

Harding, S. 1986. The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Harding, S. 1987. Introduction: is there a feminist method? In: Feminism and Methodology: Social Science Issues (ed. S. Harding). Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 1–14.

Hastorf, C. A. 1991. Gender, space, and food in prehistory. In: Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory (eds J. M. Gero and M. W. Conkey). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, pp. 132–62.

Jackson, T. L. 1991. Pounding acorn: women’s production as social and economic focus. In: Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory (eds J. M. Gero and M. W. Conkey). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, pp. 301–28.

Jagger, A. M. Feminist Politics and Human Nature. Sussex: Rowman & Allanheld, 1983.

Joyce, R. A. 1996. The construction of gender in classic Maya monuments. In: Gender and Archaeology (ed. R. P. Wright). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 167–98.

Joyce, R. 2000. A Precolumbian gaze: male sexuality among the Ancient Maya. In: Archaeologies of Sexuality (eds R. A. Schmidt and B. L. Voss). London: Routledge, in press.

Joyce, R. A. and Claassen, C. 1997. Women in the ancient Americas: archaeologists, gender, and the making of prehistory. In: Women in Prehistory: North America and Mesoamerica (eds C. Claassen and R. A. Joyce). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, pp. 1–14.

Katz, J. 1976. Gay American History: Lesbians and Gay Men in the U.S.A. New York: Thomas Crowell.

Linden, R. R., Pagano, D. R., Russell, D. E. H. and Star, S. L. (eds) 1982. Against Sadomasochism: A Radical Feminist Analysis. East Palo Alto, CA: Frog. The Well Press.

Meskell, L. 1996. The somatization of archaeology: institutions, discourses, corporeality. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 29(1): 2–16.

Meskell, L. 1998. An archaeology of social relations in an Egyptian village. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 5(3): 209–43.

Meskell, L. 2000. Reem(bed)ing sex: domesticity, sexuality, and ritual in New Kingdom Egypt. In: Archaeologies of Sexuality (eds R. A. Schmidt and B. L. Voss). London: Routledge, in press.

Miller, V. E. (ed.) 1988. The Role of Gender in Precolumbian Art and Architecture. Washington, DC: University Press of America.

Moore, J. and Scott, E. (eds) 1997. Invisible People and Processes: Writing Gender and Childhood into European Archaeology. London: Leicester University Press.

Nelson, S. M. 1997. Gender in Archaeology: Analyzing Power and Prestige. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.

Ortner, S. B. and Whitehead, H. (eds) 1981. Sexual Meanings: The Cultural Construction of Gender and Sexuality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Reiter, R. R. (ed.) 1975. Toward an Anthropology of Women. New York: Monthly Review Press.

Roberts, C. 1993. A critical approach to gender as a category of analysis in archaeology. In: Women in Archaeology: A Feminist Critique (eds H. du Cros and L. Smith). Canberra: Department of Prehistory, The Australian National University, pp. 16–21.

Rosaldo, M. Z. and Lamphere, L. (eds) 1974. Women, Culture, and Society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Rowbotham, S. and Weeks, J. 1977. Socialism and the New Life: The Personal and Sexual Politics of Edward Carpenter and Havelock Ellis. London: Pluto Press.

Rubin, G. 1975. The traffic in women: notes on the ‘Political Economy’ of sex. In: Toward an Anthropology of Women (ed. R. R. Reiter). New York: Monthly Review Press, pp. 157–210.

Rubin, G. 1984. Thinking sex: notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality. In: Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality (ed. C. S. Vance). London: Pandora, pp. 267–319.

Rubin, G. 1994. Sexual traffic: an interview with Judith Butler. Differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 6(2 + 3): 62–99.

Rubin, G. 2000. Sites, settlements, and urban sex: archaeology and the study of gay leathermen in San Francisco, 1955–1995. In: Archaeologies of Sexuality (eds R. A. Schmidt and B. L. Voss). London: Routledge, in press.

SAMOIS (ed.), 1982. Coming to Power: Writings and Graphics on Lesbian S/M. Boston, MA: Alyson Publications.

Schmidt, R. A. and Voss, B. L. (eds) 2000. Archaeologies of Sexuality. London: Routledge. Sedgwick, E. K. 1990. Epistemology of the Closet. Berkeley: University of California Press. Seifert, D. J. (ed.) 1991. Historical Archaeology: Gender in Historical Archaeology, 25(4).

Smith-Rosenberg, C. 1979. The female world of love and ritual: relations between women in nineteenth-century America. In: A Heritage of Her Own (eds N. F. Cott and E. H. Pleck). New York: Simon & Schuster, Touchstone, pp. 311–42.

Snitow, A., Stansell, C. and Thompson, S. (eds) 1983. Powers of Desire: The Politics of Sexuality. New York: Monthly Review Press.

Spector, J. D. 1991. What this awl means: toward a feminist archaeology. In: Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory (eds J. M. Gero and M. W. Conkey). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, pp. 388–406.

Spector, J. D. 1993. What This Awl Means: Feminist Archaeology at a Wahpeton Dakota Village. St. Paul, Minnesota: Minnesota Historical Society Press.

Vance, C. S. (ed.) 1984. Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality. New York: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Vasey, P. L. 1998. Intimate sexual relations in prehistory: lessons from the Japanese Macaques.World Archaeology, 29(3): 407–25.

Voss, B. L.; Schmidt, R. A. 2000. Archaeologies of sexuality: an introduction. In: Archaeologies of Sexuality (eds R. A. Schmidt and B. L. Voss). London: Routledge, in press.

Walde, D.; Willows, N. D. (eds) 1991. The Archaeology of Gender: Proceedings of the Twenty- Second Annual Conference of the Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary. Calgary: Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary.

Wall, D. de 1994. The Archaeology of Gender: Separating the Spheres in Urban America. New York: Plenum Press.

Warner, M. (ed.) 1993. Fear of a Queer Planet: Queer Politics and Social Theory. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

Watson, P. J.; Kennedy, M. C. 1991. The development of horticulture in the eastern woodlands: women’s role. In: Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory (eds J. M. Gero and M. W. Conkey). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, pp. 255–75.

Weeks, J. 1977. Coming Out: Homosexual Politics in Britain from the Nineteenth Century to the Present. London: Quartet.

Wright, R. P. 1991. Women’s labor and pottery production in prehistory. In: Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory (eds J. M. Gero and M. W. Conkey). Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, pp. 194–223.

Wright, R. P. (ed.) 1996. Gender and Archaeology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

Wright, R. P. 2000. Digging women: feminism comes to archaeology. The Women’s Review of Books, 17(5): 18–19.

Wylie, A. 1991. Feminist critiques and archaeological challenges. In: The Archaeology of Gender: Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Conference of the Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary (eds D. Walde and N. D. Willows). Calgary: Archaeological Association of the University of Calgary, pp. 17–23.

Wylie, A. 1992. Reasoning about ourselves: feminist methodology in the social sciences. In: Women and Reason (eds E. Harvey and K. Okruhlik). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 225–44.

Wylie, A. 1996. The constitution of archaeological evidence: gender politics and science. In: The Disunity of Science: Boundaries, Contexts, Power (eds P. Galison and D. J. Stump). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 311–43.

Wylie, A. 1997a. Good science, bad science, or science as usual? Feminist critiques of science. In: Women and Human Evolution (ed. L. D. Hager). London: Routledge, pp. 29–55.

Wylie, A. 1997b. The engendering of archaeology: refiguring feminist science studies. Osiris, 12: 80–99.

Wylie, A. in press. Doing social science as a feminist: the engendering of archaeology. In: Science, Medicine, Technology: The Difference Feminism Has Made (eds A. N. H. Creager, E. Lunbeck, L. Schiebinger). Chicago: University of Chicago Press, in press.

Downloads

Publicado

2021-06-28

Como Citar

VOSS , B. L. .; FREITAS , L. dos S. F. de .; WICHERS, C. A. de M. . Feminismos, teorias queer e o estudo arqueológico de sexualidades passadas. Revista Arqueologia Pública, Campinas, SP, v. 16, n. 1, p. 285–304, 2021. DOI: 10.20396/rap.v16i1.8666176. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rap/article/view/8666176. Acesso em: 25 out. 2021.