Resumo
Este artigo tem como objetivo comparar duas páginas de blogs que versam sobre o sítio arqueológico Göbekli Tepe de forma pseudoarqueológica. Para tanto, primeiro será feita uma fundamentação sobre o método arqueológico e a pseudoarqueologia, de modo a conceituar o último termo; em seguida, analisaremos pontos que aproximam e distanciam as fontes quanto ao seu modo de convencimento do leitor e a presença de ideias colonialistas.
Referências
Atalay, S. (2006). Indigenous archaeology as decolonizing practice. The American Indian Quarterly, 30(3), 280-310. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/aiq.2006.0015
Banning, E. B. (2011). So fair a house: Göbekli Tepe and the identification of temples in the pre-pottery neolithic of the near east. Current Anthropology, 52(5), 619-660. https://doi.org/10.1086/661207
Cole, J. R. (1978). Cult archaeology and unscientific method and theory. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 3, 1-33.
Curry, A. (2008). Göbekli Tepe: The World’s First Temple?. Smithsonian Magazine. https://www.smithsonianmag.com/history/Göbekli-tepe-the-worlds-first-temple-83613665/
Damas, O. F. (2011). Göbekli Tepe e o Jardim do Éden. Assuntos Polêmicos da Bíblia. https://assuntospolemicosdabiblia.com/blog/gobekli-tepe-e-o-jardim-do-eden/
Damas, O. F. (2023). O autor. Assuntos Polêmicos da Bíblia. https://assuntospolemicosdabiblia.com/blog/o-autor/
Deutsches Archäologisches Institut. (2024). FAQ. https://www.dainst.blog/the-tepe-telegrams/faq/
Dietrich, L., Meister, J. Dietrich, O., Notroff, J., Kiep, J., Heeb, J., & Schütt, B. (2019). Cereal processing at early neolithic Göbekli Tepe, southeastern Turkey. Plos One, 14(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215214
Dietrich, O., Heun, M., Notroff, J., Schmidt, K., & Zarnkow, M. (2012). The role of cult and feasting in the emergence of Neolithic communities: New evidence from Göbekli Tepe, south-eastern Turkey. Antiquity, 86(333), 674-695. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003598X00047840
Fagan, G. G. (2006). Diagnosing pseudoarchaeology. In Fagan, G. G. (Ed.), Archaeological fantasies: How pseudoarchaeology misrepresents the past and misleads the public (23-46). Routledge.
Fender, C. (2022). Addressing the alien in the room: Why Public perception is imperative to the field of archaeology. Pathways, 3(1), 29-42. https://doi.org/10.29173/pathways38
Gaia. (2024). Who we are. https://www.gaia.com/lp/about
Gnecco, C. (2012). “Escavando” arqueologias alternativas. Revista de Arqueologia, 25(2), 8-22. https://doi.org/10.24885/sab.v25i2.352
Haber, A. (2016). Decolonizing archaeological thought in South America. Annual Review of Anthropology, 45(1), 469-485.
Hancock, G. (2017). Magicians of the gods. Thomas Dunne Books.
Hodder, I. (1999). The archaeological process: An introduction. Blackwell.
Moshenska, G. (2017). Alternative archaeologies. In Moshenska, G. (Ed.), Key concepts in public archaeology (pp. 122-137). UCL Press.
Murphy, A. (2017). What is Göbekli Tepe? Facts, history, and speculation. Gaia. https://www.gaia.com/article/what-is-Göbekli-tepe
Quijano, A. (2005). Colonialidade do poder, eurocentrismo e América Latina. In Lander, E. (Org.), A colonialidade do saber: Eurocentrismo e ciências sociais: Perspectivas latino-americanas (pp. 117-142). Clacso.
Scham, S. (2008). The world’s first temple. Archaeology, 61(6), 22-27.
Schmidt, K. (2000). Göbekli Tepe, southeastern Turkey: A preliminary report on the 1995-1999 excavations. Paléorient, 26(1), 45-54.
Silva, F. A. (2002). Mito e arqueologia: A interpretação dos Asurini do Xingu sobre os vestígios arqueológicos encontrados no parque indígena Kuatinemu – Pará. Horizontes Antropológicos, 8(18), 175-187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0104-71832002000200008
Trigger, B. G. (1984). Alternative archaeologies: Nationalist, colonialist, imperialist. Man, 19(3), 355-370. https://doi.org/10.2307/2802176
Trigger, B. G. (2004). História do pensamento arqueológico. Odysseus.
West, R. (2013, February 7). Gobëkli Tepe: Turkish delight, or Turkey’s archaeological Turkey? Big-lies. https://big-lies.org/general/gobekli-tepe.html
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2024 Revista Arqueologia Pública
Downloads
