Palabras clave
Prehistory
Archaeology
Humanities
Tomar
Cómo citar
Resumen
The growing divide between sciences and humanities has led, in the last decades, to their global weakening, leading to a pragmatic empire of technological solutions deprived from meaning and global reasoning. In parallel, the source o many current disruptive processes is the incapacity of understanding the implications of the global merger of economies and societies, but also the trend towards segregating new identities and cultural networks. We consider that education and training are key elements in the process of building shared landscapes, i.e., shared convergent perceptions of the territories, and that education in prehistory and archaeology should be structured within this framework. Reflecting on general concerns and perspectives of Humanities education at large, and on specific constraints in Europe and Portugal, we argue that the specific relevance of archaeology within a programme for humanities concerns its expertise in assessing adaptation mechanisms, economy-environment balances, techniques and technology, as well as its interdisciplinary approach, going beyond humanities and involving social and natural sciences. The text concludes by presenting the structure and strategy of the Master programme in Prehistoric Archaeology and Rock Art, as part of a wider programme of archaeology and cultural heritage education at the Polytechnic Institute of Tomar.
Citas
Arnold, K. (2006). Cabinets for the curious: looking back at early English museums. London: Ashgate.
Böhme, G. & Stehr, N. (1986). The Knowledge Society: The Growing Impact of Scientific Knowledge on Social Relations. Dordrecht, D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Bourdieu, P., Passeron, J. C. (1977). Reproduction in Education, Society and Culture. London: Sage.
Carr, N. (2011). The shallows: What the internet is doing to our brains. NY: W.W. Norton & Co.
Castells, M. (2010). The Rise of the Network Society: Economy, Society, and Culture, 2.ª Ed., Vol. I – Information Age. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Crowley, J. (2016). Sustainability as narrative. From scientific abstraction to social representation. In: Oosterbeek, L.; Quagliuolo, M.; Caron, L. (2016, eds,). Sustainability Dilemmas.Transdisciplinary contributions to integrated cultural landscape management.ITM, série ARKEOS, vol. 38-39, pp. 37-53.
Derrida, J. (1967). L’Écriture Et La Différence. Paris: Les Éditions du Seuil.
Fabião, Carlos (1999). Um século de Arqueologia em Portugal – I. In: Al-madan. – Almada: Centro de Arqueologia de Almada. – ISSN 0871-066X. – Sér. 2, n.º 8, pp. 104-126.
Fabião, Carlos (2006). A Universidade e as Empresas de Arqueologia: vias para uma relação desejável. In: Era Arqueologia. – Lisboa: Era Arqueologia. – ISSN 0874-9701. – N.º 7 (Fev.), pp. 30-40.
Fiorillo, Celso A. P. (2015). Princípios constitucionais do direito da sociedade da informação São Paulo: Editora Saraiva.
Hellier, J. (2012). North-South Globalization and Inequality. In: ECINEQ Working paper series. 273 (www.ecineq.org/milano/WP/ECINEQ2012-273.pdf).
ISSC, IDS and UNESCO (2016). World Social Science Report 2016 Challenging inequalities: pathways to a just world. Paris: UNESCO publishing.
Leonhard, G. (2016). Technology vs Humanity. UK: Fast Future Publishing.
Lopes, Flávio; Correia, Miguel Brito (2004). Património Arquitectónico e Arqueológico:Cartas, Recomendações e Convenções Internacionais , Livros Horizonte, Lisboa, 2004.
Miranda, J. M., Meseguer, J. S., Ramírez, A. (1986). Bases para el estudio de las relaciones entre el medio geográfico y los asentamientos humanos. IN: Arqueología espacial, vol. 7, pp. 199-212.
Oosterbeek, L. (2007). Arqueologia, património e gestão do território: polémicas. Erechim: Habilis, 199, [1] p.
Oosterbeek, L. (1999). Artes, Ciências e Tecnologia: dialéctica da educação ou o paradoxo da modernidade politécnica, IN: A. R. Cruz, L. Oosterbeek, coord. (1999), Perspectivas em Diálogo 1 º Curso Intensivo de Arte Pré-Histórica Europeia, série ARKEOS, vol. 6, tomo I, Centro Europeu de Investigação da Pré-História do Alto Ribatejo, pp. 179-186.
Oosterbeek, L. (2011a). Is There a Role for the Humanities in Face of the Global Warming and Social Crisis? Journal of Iberian Archaeology, vol. 14, pp. 97-103.
Oosterbeek, L. (2014b). Changing the gestures of the eyes to invent new landscapes. In: Oosterbeek, L.; Pollice, F. Cultural heritage and local development Local communities through heritage awareness and global understanding Ravello: appendix to Territori della Cultura n 18, pp. 108-117.
Oosterbeek, L. (2011c). Um Século e Meio de Conflitos na Arqueologia Preventiva em Portugal: entre o dever e o esquecimento. Area Domeniu vol. 4, pp. 35-56.
Oosterbeek, L. (2014a). Gestão Integrada de Território em Morro do Pilar: uma nova visão para o uso inteligente do território. IN: Oliveira, L. C. (coord,) Morro do Pilar: cultura, memória, sustentabilidade e a antecipação do futuro. Morro do Pilar: Instituto do Espinhaço, pp. 288-313.
Oosterbeek, L. (2016). Becoming Human. New approaches for uncertain times. In: Oosterbeek, L.; Quagliuolo, M.; Caron, L. (2016, eds,). Sustainability Dilemmas Transdisciplinary contributions to integrated cultural landscape management ITM, série ARKEOS, vol. 38-39, pp. 85-107.
Oosterbeek, L. (2017a). Kóios and Phoïbe: knowledge through sociocultural matrices, in the framework of cultural integrated landscape management and sustainability science. In: Oosterbeek, L.; Werlen, B.; Caron, L. (2017, eds,). Sociocultural matrices Transdisciplinary contributions to integrated cultural landscape management – Vol. 1 ITM, série ARKEOS, vol. 40, pp. 45-64.
Oosterbeek, L. (2017b). Encrypting and decrypting territories: training, education and communication within landscapes. In: Oosterbeek L., Gudauskas R., Caron L. (eds, 2017). Education, training and communication in cultural management of landscapes. Transdisciplinary contributions to Cultural Integrated Landscape Management. Mação: Instituto Terra e Memória, série Arkeos, vol. 42., pp. 11-18.
Oosterbeek, L., Scheunemann, Inguelore, Rosina, P., Tristao, A., Anastacio, R., Guimaraes, A., Santos, F.D. (2011). Gestao integrada de grandes espacos urbanos - Uma reflexao transatlantica. IN: Revista Internacional em Lingua Portuguesa, III serie, no 23, pp. 163-176.
Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York: Basic Books.
Raposo, Luís (1999). Arqueologia e museus em Portugal desde finais do século XIX. In: Al-madan. – Almada: Centro de Arqueologia de Almada. – ISSN 0871- 066X. – Sér. 2, n.º 8 (Out.), pp. 169-17.
Scheunemann, I.; Oosterbeek, L. (Eds) (2012). A new paradigm of sustainability: theory and praxis of integrated landscape management.Rio de Janeiro: IBIO.
Schwartzman, R. (2013). Consequences of commodifying education.Academic Exchange Quarterly, 17(3), 41-46.
Silva, António Carlos (2002). Das propostas de Estácio da Veiga (1880) à criação do Instituto Português de Arqueologia (1996): cem anos de equívocos na gestão do património arqueológico. In: Arqueologia e história. – Lisboa: Associação dos Arqueólogos Portugueses. – Vol. 54, pp. 299-315.
Sousa, D. A.; Pilecki, T. (2013). From STEM to STEAM. Thousand Oaks, California: Corwin.
Stiglitz, Joseph E. (2012). The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers Our Future.New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
UNESCO (2015). Re-shaping cultural policies. A decade promoting the diversity of cultural expressions for development.Luxembourg: Imprimerie Centrale.
Vasile, C. (2012). Digital era psychology – studies on cognitive changes. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 33, pp. 732-736.
A Revista Arqueologia Pública utiliza a licença do Creative Commons (CC), preservando assim, a integridade dos artigos em ambiente de acesso aberto.
Descargas
