Palavras-chave
Como Citar
Resumo
O artigo aborda as críticas mais importantes articuladas durante os últimos trinta anos da Teoria Conceptual da Metáfora fundada por Lakoff & Johnson. Nosssa intenção é sintetizar e discutir os pontos mais fracos da abordagem e dirigir nossa atenção para pesquisas atuais que buscam superar as falhas da teoria sem abandonar seus pressupostos básicos.
Referências
ALVERSON, H. (1991). “Metaphor and Experience: Looking Over the Notion of Image Schema”. In: FERNANDEZ, J. W. Beyond metaphor: The theory of tropes in anthropology. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 94-117.
BLACK, M. (1962). Models and Metaphors. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
BRANDT, L. & BRANDT, Per Aage. (2005). “Making sense of a blend. A cognitive-semiotic approach to metaphor”. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 3, pp. 216-249.
BÜHLER, K. (1934/1982). Sprachtheorie: die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Stuttgart: Fischer.
BURKHARDT, A. (1987). “Wie die ‚wahre Welt endlich zur Metapher wurde. Zur Konstitution, Leistung und Typologie der Metaphe”. In: Conceptus XXI, 52, pp. 39-67.
BUTTERS, R. R. (1981). Do ‚Conceptual Metaphors Really Exist?“ In: Southeastern Conference on Linguistics Bulletin 5, 3, pp. 108-117.
CAMERON, L. “Metaphor and talk”. (2008) In: GIBBS, R. W. Jr. The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 197-211.
CAMERON, L. (2007). “Confrontation or complementarity? Metaphor in language use and cognitive metaphor theory”. In: Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 5, pp. 107-135.
CAMERON, L. & DEIGNAN, A. (2003). “Combining Large and Small Corpora to Investigate Tuning Devices Around Metaphor in Spoken Discourse”. In: Metaphor And Symbol 18 (3), pp. 149-160.
CHARTERIS-BLACK, J. (2004). Corpus approaches to critical metaphor analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
DEBATIN, B. (1995). Die Rationalität der Metapher. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.
DEIGNAN, A. (2005). Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
FAUCONNIER, G. & TURNER, M. (2002). The Way We Think. New York: Basic Books.
FEILKE, H. (1994). Common sense-Kompetenz. Überlegungen zu einer Theorie “sympathischen” und “natürlichen“ Meines und Verstehens. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
FERNANDEZ. J. W. (1991). “Introduction: Confluents of Inquiry”. In:
FERNANDEZ, J. W. Beyond metaphor: The theory of tropes in anthropology. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 1-13.
GIBBS, R. W. Jr. (1999). “Taking metaphor out of our heads and putting it into the cultural world”. In: GIBBS, R. W. Jr. & STEEN, G. J. Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
HASER, V. (2005). Metaphor, Metonymy, and Experientialist Philosophy: Challenging Cognitive Semantics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
HOLLAND, D. (1982). “All is Metaphor: conventional Metaphors in Human Thought and Language”. In: Reviews in Anthropology, 9, pp. 287-297.
HOLT, E. & DREW, P. (2005). “Figurative Pivots: The Use of Figurative Expressions in Pivotal Topic Transitions”. In: Research on Language and Sozial Interaction, 38, 1, pp. 35-61.
HüLZER-VOGT, H. (1991). Kippfigur Metapher – metaphernbedingte Kommunikationskonflikte in Gesprächen. Ein Beitrag zur empirischen Kommunikationsforschung. Band 1: Gesprächsanalyse. Münster: Nodus Publikationen.
HüLZER-VOGT, H.(1987). Die Metapher. Kommunikationssemantische Überlegungen zu einer rhetorischen Kategorie. Münster: Nodus Publikationen.
JACKENDOFF, R. (2002). Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
JäKEL, O. (2003). Wie Metaphern Wissen schaffen: die kognitive Metapherntheorie und ihre Anwendung in Modell-Analysen der Diskursbereiche Geistestätigkeit, Wirtschaft, Wissenschaft und Religion. Hamburg: Kovač.
JOHNSON, M. (1987). The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
KIMMEL, M. (2005). “Culture regained: situated and compound image schemas”. In: HAMPE, B. & GRADY, J. E. From Perception to Meaning. Image Schemas in Cognitive Linguistics. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 285-311.
KÖVECSES, Z. (2005). Metaphor in Culture. Universality and Variation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
LAKOFF, G. (1993).“The contemporary theory of metaphor”. In: ORTONY, A. Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 202-251.
LAKOFF, G. (1989). “Some empirical results about the nature of concepts”. Mind and Language 4, pp. 119-154.
LAKOFF, G. (1987). Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
LAKOFF, G. (1982). Categories and Cognitive Models. Berkeley cognitive Science Report, 2.
LAKOFF, G. & JOHNSON, M. (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh. The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
LAKOFF, G. (1980/2003). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
LAKOFF, G. & TURNER, M. (1989). More than Cool Reason. A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press.
LAKOFF, G. & WEHLING, E. (2009). Auf leisen Sohlen ins Gehirn. Politische Sprache und ihre heimliche Macht. Heidelberg: Carl-Auer-Systeme.
LAWLER, J. M. (1983 ). “Review: Metaphors We Live By”. In: Language, 59/1, pp. 201-207.
SCHRÖEDER - Trinta anos da teoria conceptual da metáfora...
LEEZENBERG, M. (2001). Contexts of Metaphor. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
LINZ, E. (2004 ). „Sprachlose Metaphern. Zur Rhetorizität der Kognition und ihrer Modellierung in der kognitiven Linguistik“. In: FOHRMANN, J. Rhetorik. Figuration und Performanz. Stuttgart, Weimar: Metzler. pp. 246-266.
LINZ, E. (2002). Indiskrete Semantik. Kognitive Linguistik und neurowissenschaftliche Theoriebildung. München: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.
MELO MOURA, H. M. (2005). “Metáforas e Regularidades Lingüísticas”. In:
MIRANDA, N. S. & NAME, C. (Ed.). Lingüística e Cognição. Juíz de Fora: Editora UFJF, pp. 109-119.
MURPHY, G. L. (1996 ). “On metaphoric representation.” In: Cognition 60, S. pp. 173-204.
NERLICH, B. & CLARKE, D. D. (2001). “Mind, meaning and metaphor: the philosophy and psychology of metaphor in 19th-century Germany”. In: History of the Human Sciences, 14(2), pp. 39-62.
NUESSEL, F. (1990). “More Than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor”. In: Metaphor and Symbol 5 (4), pp. 251-254.
PONTEROTTO, D. (2003). “The cohesive role of metaphor in discourse and conversation”. In: BARCELONA, A. Metaphor and metonymy at the crossroads: A cognitive perspective. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter, pp. 283-298.
QUINN, N. (1991). “The cultural basis of metaphor”. In: FERNANDEZ, J. W. Beyond metaphor: The theory of tropes in anthropology. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 56-93.
RICHARDS, I. A. (1936/1965). The Philosophy of Rhetoric. New York: Oxford University Press.
ROLF, E. (2005). Metapherntheorien. Typologie, Darstellung, Bibliographie. Berlin, New York: Walter de Gruyter.
ROSCH, E. (1978). “Principles of Categorization”. In: ROSCH, E. & LLOYD, B. B. Cognition and Categorization. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 27-48.
SARDINHA, T. B. (2007). Metáfora. São Paulo: Parábola Editorial.
SCHMITZ, H. W. (1985 ). „Die durchgängige Tropisierung der Sprache. über einen Aspekt von‚ Zeichen im Wandel’“. In: DUTZ, K. D. & SCHMITTER, P. Historiographia Semioticae. Studien zur Rekonstruktion der Theorie und Geschichte der Semiotik. Münster: MAkS Publikationen, pp. 241-270.
SCHRÖDER, U. (2009a). “Preferential Metaphorical Conceptualizations in Everyday Discourse About Love in the Brazilian and German Speech Communities”. In: Metaphor and Symbol, 24/2, pp. 105-120.
SCHRÖDER, U. (2009b). “A mesclagem metafórica de Fauconnier & Turner nas teorias de Karl Bühler e Wilhelm Stählin: antecipações e complementos”. In: ABRALIN 40 Anos - VI Congresso Internacional da ABRALIN, 2009b, João Pessoa, Anais. João Pessoa: Idéia, 1, pp. 2913-2922.
SCHRÖDER, U. (2008a). “Antecipações da metáfora cotidiana nas concepções de Hans Blumenberg e Harald Weinrich”. In: Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, 16, 2, pp. 39-54.
SCHRÖDER, U. (2008b). „Aufbrüche in der kognitiven Metaphernforschung aus kommunikationswissenschaftlicher Sicht“. In: ESCHBACH, A.; HALAWA, M. A. & LOENHOFF, J. Audiator et altera pars. Kommunikationswissenschaft zwischen Historiographie, Theorie und empirischer Forschung. Aachen: Shaker Verlag, pp. 147-166.
SCHRÖDER, U. (2008c). “Da teoria cognitiva a uma teoria mais dinâmica, cultural e sociocognitiva da metáfora”. In: Alfa (ILCSE/UNESP), v. 52, pp. 39-56.
SCHRÖDER, U. (2007). “Tendenzen gegenläufiger Reterritorialisierungen in brasilianischen und deutschen Rap-Texten”. In: Lusorama, 71-72, pp. 93-119.
SCHRÖDER, U. (2004). “Os precursores filosóficos da teoria cognitiva das metáforas”. In: Cadernos de Estudos Lingüísticos 46/2, pp. 243-252.
SEMINO, E. (2008). Metaphor in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
SILVA SINHA, V.; SINHA, C.; ZINKEN, J. & SAMPAIO, W. (2009). “When Time is not Space: The social and linguistic construction of time intervals in an Amazonian culture.” Journal of Pragmatics, in press.
SINHA, C. & JENSEN DE LóPEZ, K. (2000). “Language, culture and the embodiment of spatial cognition”. In: Cognitive Linguistics, 11, pp. 17-41.
STÄHLIN, W. (1913). “Zur Psychologie und Statistik der Metaphern. Eine methodologische Untersuchung”. Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie XXXI, Frankfurt, pp. 297-425.
STEEN, G. J. (2007). Finding Metaphor in Grammar and Usage. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
STEFANOWITSCH , A. & GRIES, S. T. (2007). Corpus-Based Approaches to Metaphor and Metonymy. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
VERVAEKE, J. & KENNEDY, J. M. (1996). “Metaphors in language and thought: Falsification and multiple meanings”. In: Metaphor and Symbol, 11, pp. 273-284.
ZANOTTO, M. S. & PALMA, D. V. (2008). “Opening Pandora’s box: Multiple readings of ‘a metaphor”. In: ZANOTTO, M. S.; CAMERON, L. & CAVALCANTI, M. C. Confronting Metaphor in Use. An applied linguistic approach. Amsterdam, Philadelphia: John Benjamins, pp. 11-43.
ZINKEN, J. (2004). “Metphors, stereotypes, and the linguistic picture of the world: Impulses from the Ethnolinguistic School of Lublin.” metaphorik.de, 7, pp. 115-136, http://www.metaphorik.de/07/zinken. pdf
ZINKEN, J. & MUSOLFF, A. (2009). “Metaphorical Meadning & Understanding”. In: MUSOLFF, A. & ZINKEN, J. Metaphor and Discourse. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 1-8.
O periódico Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos utiliza a licença do Creative Commons (CC), preservando assim, a integridade dos artigos em ambiente de acesso aberto.
Downloads
