• E. M. Barth State University of Groningen





Não há dados estatísticos.


ABELSON, R. P. (1973) The structure of belief systems. In: Computer Models of Thought, eds. Schank, R. C. and Colby, K. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

ALBERT, H. (1975) [1968] Traktat Über kritische Vernunft. Tübingen: Mohr.

APOSTEL, L. (1978a) Communication et action. Gent: Communication and Cognition Press.

APOSTEL, L. (1978b) Persuasive communication as metaphorical discourse under the guidance of conversational maxims. Logique et Analyse 87: 265-320.

APOSTEL, L., ed. (1974) Negation. Gent: Communication and Cognition Press.

BARTH, E. M. (1974) The Logic of the Articles in Traditional Philosophy. A Contribution to the Study of Conceptual Structures. Dordrecht and Boston: Reidel: Translation of De logica van de lidwoorden in the traditionele filosofie, Leiden 1971: Leiden University Press.

BARTH, E. M. (1977) Phenomenology, grammar, or theory of argumentation? A plea for meta-philosophical change, applied to the problems of naninalization and of negation. Cultural Hermeneutics 4: 163-182.

BARTH, E. M. (1979) Perspectives on Analytic Philosophy. Amsterdam: North-Holand (Mededelingen der Kninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Afdeling Letterkunde, nieuwe reeks 42 (2).)

BARTH, E. M. (1981) Reconstruction of Hegelian and other idealistic logic in Germany around 1810. In: Konzepte der Dialektik, eds. W. Becker and W. K. Essler, pp. 47-65. Frakfurt-on-Main: Klostermann.

BARTH, E. M. and Krabbe, E. C. W., (1982) From Axiom to Dialogue. A Philosophical Study of Logics and Argumentation. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter. (Foundations of Communication Series, ed. Roland Posner.)

BARTH, E. M. and Martens, J. L. (1977) Argumentum an hominem: From chaos to formal dialects. The method of dialogue-tableaux as a tool in the theory of fallacy. Logique et Analyse n. s. 20 (77/78): 76-96.

BARTH, E. M. and Martens, J. L. (1982) Argumentation: Approaches to Theory Formation: Containing the Contributions to the Groningen Conference on the Theory of Argumentation, October 1978. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (Studies in Language Companion Series 8, eds. John W. M. Verhaar and Werner Abraham.)

BETH, E. W. (1955) Semantic Entailment and Formal Derivability. Amsterdam:North-Holland. (Mededelingen der Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen. Afdeling Letterkunde, nieuwe reeks 18(13). Reprinted.

Reprinted in: The Philosophy of Mathematics, ed. K.J.J. Hintikka, pp. 9-41. London etc.: Oxford University Press.

CRAWSHAY-WILLIAMS, R. (1957) Methods and Criteria of Reasoning. An Inquiry into the Structure of Controversy. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

DE GROOT, A. D. (1969) Methodology. Foundations of Inference and Research in the Behavioral Sciences. The Hague: Mouton. Translation of Methodologie Grondslagen van onderzoek en denken in de gedragswetenschappen. The Hague 1961: Mouton.

GILES, R. (1976) A logic for subjective belief. In: Foundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Inference, and Statistical Theories of Science. Proceedings of an International Research Colloquium held at the University of Western Ontario. London. Canada. 10-13 May 1973, I: Foundations and Philosophy of Epistemic Application of Probability Theory, eds. W. L. Harper and C.A. Hooker, pp. 41-72. Dordrecht and Boston: Reidel.

GRICE, H. P. Logic and Conversation (William James Lectures, ms.)

GUNTHER, A. (1977a) Der Begriff der Dialogbasis. In: Konstituenten dialogischer Kommunikation, ed. C. H. Heidrich. Hamburg: Buske.

GUNTHER, A. (1977b) Dialogkonstruktionen auf der Basis logischer Ableitungen. Hamburg: Buske. (IKP-Forschungsberichte, Reihe I, Band 68.)

HABERMAS, J. (1973) Wahrheitstheorien. In: Wirklichkeit und Reflexion. Walter Schulz zum 60. Geburtstag, ed. H. Fahrenbach, pp. 211-265. Pfullingen.

HAMBLIN, C. L. (1970) Fallacies. London: Methuen.

HAMBLIN, C. L. (1971) Mathematical models of dialogue. Theoria 37: 130-155.

HEIDRICH, C. H. (1977) Intensionale Analysen von Sprechhandlungen. Hamburg: Buske. (IKP­ Forschungsberichte, Reihe I, Band 63.)

HEIDRICH, C. H. ed. (1977) Konstituenten dialogischer Kommunikation. Hamburg: Buskes. (IKP-Forschungsberichte, Reihe I, Band 63.)

HINTIKKA, K. J. J. (1968) Language-games for quantifiers. In: Studies in Logical Theory. ed. N. Rescher. Oxford; Plackwell. (American Philosophical Quarterly Monograph Series 2, ed. N. Rescher.)

HINTIKKA, K. J. J. (1973) Logic, Language-Games and Information, Kantian Themes in the Philosophy of Logic. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.

HOFSTEE, W. K. B. (1980) De empirische discussie. Meppel: Boom.

KRABBE, E. C. W. (1978) The adequacy of material dialogue-games. (Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 19: 321-330.

KRABBE, E. C. W. (1982) Studies in Dialogical Logic. Dissertation, Groningen State University.

LORENZ, K. (1961) Arithmetik und Logik als Spiele. Inaugural dissertation, Kiel University. Selection reprinted in: Lorenzen. P. and Lorenz, K., Dialogische Logik, pp. 17-95.

LORENZ, K. (1973) Rules versus theorems: A new approach for mediation between institutionistic and two-valued logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic 2: 352-367.

LORENZEN, P. (1961) Ein dialogisches Konstruktivitätskriterium. In: Infinitistic Methods. Proceedings of the Symposium on the Foundations of Mathematics, Warsaw, 2-9 September 1959, ed.

pp. 193-200. Oxford etc.: Pergamon Press, and Warsaw: Pánstowe wydawnictwo naukowe. Reprinted in: Lorenzen, P. and Lorenz, K., Dialogische Logik, pp. 9-16.

LORENZEN, P. (1969) Normative Logic and Ethics. Mannheim etc.: Bibliographisches Institut. (The John Locke Lectures 1967-68, Oxford.)

LORENZEN, P. and Lorenz, K. (1978) Dialogische Logik. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

MITTELSTAEDT, P. (1978) Quantun Logic. Dordrecht and Boston: Reidel.

NAESS, A. (1953) Interpretation and Preciseness. A Contribution to the Theory of Communication. Oslo. (Det Norske Videnskaps-Akademi i Oslo. Skrifter II, Historisk, Filosofisk Klasse, Nº. 1.)

NAESS, A. (1956) Wie fökdert man heute die empirische Bewegung? Eine Auseinandersetzung mit dem Empirismus von Otto Neurath und Rudolph Carnap. Oslo: mimeographed. (Filosofiske Problemer 19, Institutt for Filosofi, Universitetet i Oslo.)

NAESS, A. (1966) Communication and Argument. Elenents of Applied Semantics. London: Allen and Unwin, and Oslo: Universitetsforlaget. Translation of En del eleaentaere logiske eaner, Oslo 1947: Universitetsforlaget.

NAESS, A. (1975) Kommunikation und Argunentation. Eine Einführung in die angewandte Semantik. Kronberg: Scriptor Verlag. Translation of En del elementaere logiske emner, 11th edition (1975).

NAESS, A., Christophersen, J. A.; and Kvalö, K. (1956) Democracy, Ideology, and Objectivity. Studies in the Semantics and Cognitive Analysis of Ideological Controversy. Oslo.

OLBRECHTS-Tyteca, L. (1974) Le comique du discours. Brussels: Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles.

ONG, W. J. (1974) [1958] Ranus, Method, and the D cay of Dialogue. From the Art to Discourse to the Art of Reason. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.

PARRET, H. (1980) Contexts of Understanding. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (Pragmatics and Beyond. An Interdisciplinary Series of language Studies. eds. Parret , H. and Berschueren, J, No. 6.)

PERELMAN, Ch. (1963) The Idea of Justice and the Problem of Argument. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

PERELMAN, Ch. (1977) L'Empire rhétorique. Rhétorique et argumentation. Paris: Librairie Philosophique J. Vrin.

PARELMAN, Ch., and Olbrechts-Tyteca, L. (1958) Traité de l'argumentation. La nouvelle rhetorique. Presses Universitaires de France.

PERELMAN, Ch. (1969) The New Rhetoric. A Treatise on Argumentation. Notre Dame. Ind. and London: University of Notre Dame Press. Translation of Traité de l'argumentation. La nouvelle hetorique.

POPPER, K. (1973) (1934) Logik der Forschung. Tübingen: Mohr.

POPPER, K. (1972) [1959] The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.

RESCHER, N.(1977) Dia1ectics. A Controversy-Oriented Approach to the Theory of Knowledge. Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press.

ROSCHE, E. (1975) Universals and cultural specifics in human categories. In: Cross- Cultural Perspectives on learning, eds. Brislin, R.: Bochner, S.; and lonner, W., NY: Halsted.

SAARINEN, E., ed. (1979) Game-Theoretical Semantics. Dordrecht and Boston: Reidel.

SEARLE, J. R. (1969) Speech Acts. An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

TOULMIN, S. E. (1958) The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. TOULMIN, S. E. (1975) Der Gebrauch von Argumenten. Kronberg: Scriptor Verlag. Translation of The Uses of Argument.

VAN DUN, F. (1972) On the modes of opposition in the formal dialogues of P. Lorenzen. In: Negation, ed. L. Apostel, pp. 103-136 (=Logique et Analyse 15 (57/58)).

VAN EEMEREN, F. H., and Grootendorst, R. (1983) Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions. A Theoretical Model For the Analysis of Discussion Towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion. Dordrecht: Foris Publications (in press).

VAN EEMEREN, F. H.; Grootendorst, R.; and Kruiger, T. (1982) The Study of Argumentation. New York: Irvington. Translation of Argumentatietheorie, Ultrecht and Antwerp 1978: Het Spectrum.

WALTON, O. (1983) The Ad Hominem Fallacy. A Study in the Logical Pragmatics of Criticism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins (in press). (Pragmatics and Beyond Series 4 (4), ed. Herman Parret.)

WOODS, J. (1977) Towards a theory of Argument. Metaphilosophy 8: 298-315.

WOODS, J., and Walton. D. (1972) On fallacies. Journal of Critical Analysis 4: 103-112.

WOODS, J., and Walton. D. (1976) Fallaciousness without invalidity. Philosophy and Rhetoric 9: 52-54.




Como Citar

BARTH, E. M. PARA UMA TEORIA DA ARGUMENTAÇÃO BASEADA NA PRÁXIS. Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos, Campinas, SP, v. 9, p. 69–80, 2012. DOI: 10.20396/cel.v9i0.8636725. Disponível em: Acesso em: 7 dez. 2022.