Abstract
Our aims is to distinguish Pragmatics and Discourse Analysis of French School by taking into account the role of context and ideology. This paper emphasises the differences introduced by concepts as subject, language and interpretation in both theories. We concluded by the importance of discourse´s definition as a sign of the difference between Pragmatics and Discourse Analysis.References
CANGUILHEN, L. Le Cerveau et la Pensée, MURS, Paris, 1980.
HENRY, P. Sujeito, Origem, Sentido in Discurso Fundador, Eni P. Orlandi (org.), Ed. Pontes, Campinas, 1994.
LECOURT, D. Pour Une critique de l´Épistémologie, Maspero, Paris, 1978.
MILNER, J. C. L’Amour de la Langue, Ed. Seuil, Paris, 1978.
ORLANDI, E. Interpretação, Ed. Vozes, 1995.
PÊCHEUX, M. Vérités de La Palice, Maspero, Paris, 1975.
______. Ler O Arquivo Hoje, in Gestos de Leitura, Eni P. Orlandi (org. ), Ed Unicamp, Campinas, 1994.
The journal CADERNOS DE ESTUDOS LINGUÍSTICOS is granted all the copyright related to the published works. The originals will not be returned. By virtue of being part of this public access journal, the articles are free to use, with their own attributions, in educational and non-commercial applications
Downloads
