Palabras clave
Juicios de aceptabilidad
Morfosintaxis
Pragmática
Cómo citar
Resumen
Este artículo se centra en el efecto de la incongruencia de la concordancia de género entre los pronombres personales y sus antecedentes entre oraciones. En dos experimentos de aceptabilidad, se prueba si la aceptabilidad de las violaciones del acuerdo de género en sustantivos animados puede ser modulada por las características gramaticales y contextuales de los antecedentes de los pronombres personales. En el primer experimento, la "especificidad" del antecedente se manipula para hacer que el antecedente se refiera a la clase de individuos o a un referente específico. En el segundo experimento, utilizando nombres propios estereotípicamente masculinos o femeninos, se prueba si se puede atenuar la incongruencia gramatical de género entre pronombres personales comunes y comunes y sustantivos de dos géneros. Aunque el primer experimento mostró un efecto explicado puramente por factores gramaticales, frente a muchas teorías de acuerdo "semántico", los resultados del segundo experimento sugieren que las características gramaticales y contextuales del antecedente se calculan en paralelo cuando los hablantes evalúan las relaciones de concordancia entre los pronombres personales y sus antecedentes.
Citas
AN, A.; ABEILLÉ, A. Agreement and interpretation of binominals in French. In: MÜLLER, S. (Ed.). Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 2017. p. 26-43.
ALVES, M. C. d. S. Processamento do traço de gênero na correferência pronominal com antecedentes sobrecomuns e comuns de dois gêneros no português do Brasil. Dissertação (Mestrado em Linguística) – Universidade Federal do Rio Janeiro, Rio Janeiro, RJ, Brasil. 2014.
ALVES, M. C. d. S. Gender features in pronoun resolution processing in Brazilian Portuguese. Proceedings of the Linguistic Society of America. v. 1, artigo 27, 1-15, 2016.
ALVES, M. C. d. S. Agreement effects of gender and number in pronominal coreference processing in Brazilian Portuguese. Revista de Estudos da Linguagem, v. 25, n. 3, p. 1327-1366, 2017.
ALVES, M. C. d. S. As diferenças entre gênero grammatical e gênero semântico na recuperação de antecedents pronominais em português brasileiro. Diacrítica. v. 33, n. 2, p. 89-115, 2019.
BAAYEN, R. H.; DAVIDSON, D. J.; BATES, D. Mixed-effects modeling with crossedrandom effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, v. 59, p. 390-412, 2008.
BARR, D. J.; LEVY, R.; SCHEEPERS, C.; TILY, H. J. Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal. Journal of Memory and Language, v. 68, p. 255-278, 2013.
BREHM, L.; ALDAY, P. M. A decade of mixed models: It’s past time to set your contrasts. 26th Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing Conference (AMLap 2020). Alemanha: Potsdam, 2020.
CACCIARI, C; CARREIRAS, M.; CIONINI, C. B. When Words Have Two Genders: Anaphor Resolution for Italian Functionally Ambiguous Words. Journal of Memory and Language, v. 37, n. 4, p 517-532, 1997.
CACCIARI, C.; PADOVANI, R. Further evidence on gender stereotype priming in language: Semantic facilitation and inhibition on Italian role nouns. Applied Psycholinguistics, v. 28, p. 277-293, 2007.
CACCIARI, C.; CORRADINI, P.; PADOVANI, R.; CARREIRAS, M. Pronoun resolution in Italian: the role of grammatical gender and context. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, v. 23, n. 4, p. 416-434, 2011.
CARREIRAS, M.; GARNHAM, A.; OAKHILL; J. V.; CAIN, K. The use of stereotypical gender information in constructing a mental model: Evidence from English and Spanish. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, v. 49A, n. 3, p. 639-663, 1997.
CASADO, A.; PALMA, A.; PAOLIERI, D. The influence of sex information on gender word processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, v. 47, n. 3, p. 1-27, 2017.
CHOMSKY, N. Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris, 1981.
CLARK, S. E.; GRONLUND, S. D. Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, v. 3, p. 37-60, 1996.
COMRIE, B. Polite plurals and predicate agreement. Language, v. 51, n. 2: p. 406-418, 1975.
CORBETT, G. Predicate Agreement in Russian. Birmingham: University of Birmingham, 1979.
CORBETT, G. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.
CORBETT, G. Gender and gender systems. In: ASHER, R. (Ed.) The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1994. p. 1347-1353.
CORBETT, G. Agreement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006.
CORRÊA, L. S. Concordância de gênero no processamento de formas pronominais. Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos, v. 40, p. 77-92, 2001.
CROFT, W. Radical Construction Grammar: syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
CROFT, W. Agreement as anaphora, anaphora as coreference. In: BAKKER, D; HASPELMATH, M (Eds.). Languages across boundaries: studies in memory of Anna Siewierska. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2013. p. 107-129.
DILLON, B. Structured access in comprehension. Tese (Doutorado em Linguística). University of Maryland, College Park, EUA. 2011.
DILLON, B. Syntactic memory in comprehension of reflexive dependencies: An overview. Language and Linguistics Compass, v. 8, p. 171-187, 2014.
DILLON, B.; MISHLER, A.; SLOGGETT, S.; PHILLIPS, C. Contrasting intrusion profiles for agreement and anaphora. Journal of Memory and Language, v. 69, p. 85-103, 2013.
DIXON, R. Noun Classes. Lingua, v. XXI, p. 105-111, 1968.
DOWTY, D.; JACOBSON, P. Agreement as a semantic phenomenon. In: POWERS, J.; DE JONG, K. (Eds.). Proceedings of the Fifth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University, 1989. p. 95-108.
DRUMMOND, A. Ibex Farm. 2013. Disponível em: http://spellout.net/ibexfarm/. Acesso em 30 set. 2020.
FRANCESCHINA, F. Fossilized Second Language Grammars: The Acquisition of Grammatical Gender. Amsterdam, Holanda: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2005.
HASPELMATH, M. Argument indexing: a conceptual framework for the syntactic status of bound person forms. In: BAKKER, D; HASPELMATH, M (Eds.). Languages across boundaries: studies in memory of Anna Siewierska. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2013. p. 197-225.
HOCKETT, C. A course in modern linguistics, Birmingham, Inglaterra: Macmillan, 1958.
JOHNSON, C. A. Deconstructing and Reconstructing Semantic Agreement: A Case Study of Multiple Antecedent Agreement in Indo-European. Tese (Doutorado em Linguística) – The Ohio State University, Columbus, EUA, 2014.
KATHOL, A. (1999). Agreement and the syntax-morphology interface in HPSG. In: LEVINE, R.; GREEN, G. (Eds.). Studies in Contemporary Phrase Structure Grammar. Cambridge, Inglaterra, Cambridge University Press: 1999. p. 223–276.
KATHOL, A.; PRZEPIÓRKOWSKI, A.; TSENG, J. Advanced Topics in Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. In: BORSLEY, R.; BÖRJARS, K. (Eds.). Non-Transformational Syntax. Oxford, UK/Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2011. p. 54-111.
KUZNETSOVA, A.; BROCKHOFF, P. B.; CHRISTENSEN, R. H. B. lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models. Journal of Statistical Software, v. 82, n. 13, p. 1-26, 2017.
LAWALL, R.; MAIA, M.; AMARAL, L. Resolução pronominal com antecedentes sobrecomuns e comuns de dois gêneros em Português Brasileiro como lingual maternal, lingual de herança e como segunda lingual. Revista Linguística, v. 8, n. 2, p. 134-158, 2005.
LEITÃO, M.; PEIXOTO, P.; SANTOS, S. Processamento da co-referência intra-sentencial em português brasileiro. Veredas, v. 12, n. 2, p. 50–61, 2008.
LEWIS, R. L.; VASISHTH, S. An Activation-Based Model of Sentence Processing as Skilled Memory Retrieval. Cognitive Science, v. 29, p. 375-419, 2005.
LEWIS, R. L.; VASISHTH, S.; VAN DYKE, J. A. Computational principles of working memory in sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Science, v. 10, p. 447-454, 2006.
MARTIN, A. E., & MCELREE, B. A content-addressable pointermechanism underlies comprehension of verb-phrase ellipsis. Journal of Memory and Language, v. 58, p. 879-906, 2008.
MATTHEWS, P. H. Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
MCELREE, B. Sentence comprehension is mediated by content addressable memory structures. Journal of Psycholinguistc Research, v. 29, p. 111-123, 2000.
MCELREE, B.; FORAKER, S.; DYER, LISBETH. Memory structures that subserve sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, v. 48, p. 67-91, 2003.
PARKER, D.; PHILLIPS, C. Reflexive attraction is selective: Evidence from eye-tracking. Journal of Memory and Language, v. 94, p. 272-290, 2017.
PARKER, D.; SHVARTSMAN, M.; VAN DYKE, J. A. The cue-based based retrieval theory of sentence comprehension: New findings and new challenges. In: ESCOBAR, V.; TORRENS, V.; PARODI, T. (Eds.). Language Processing and Disorders. Cambridge Scholars, Newcastle, Inglaterra, 2017. p. 121-144.
PATIL, U.; VASISHTH, S.; LEWIS, R. L. Retrieval interference in syntactic processing. Frontiers of Psychology, v. 7, artigo 329, 2016.
POLLARD, C.; SAG, I. Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.
SCHAD, D.; HOHENSTEIN, S.; VASISHTH, S.; KLIEGL, R. How to capitalize on a priori contrasts in linear (mixed) models: A tutorial. Journal of Memory and Language, v. 110, artigo 104038, 2019.
SLEVC, L. R.; MARTIN, R. C. Syntactic agreement attraction reflects working memory processes. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, v. 28, p. 773-790, 2016.
STEELE, S. The category AUX as a language universal. In: GREENBERG, J.; FERGUSON, C.; MORAVCSIK, E. (Eds.). Universals of human language. v. 3. Stanford, Stanford University Press: 1978. p. 7-45.
VAN DYKE, J.; MCELREE, B. Retrieval interference in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, v. 55, p. 157-166, 2006.
VAN DYKE, J.; MCELREE, B. Cue-dependent interference in comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, v. 65, p. 247-263, 2011.
VIGLIOCCO, G.; NICOL, J. Separating hierarchical relations and word order in language production: is proximity concord syntactic or linear? Cognition, v. 68, B13-B29, 1998.
VILLAVICENCIO, A.; SADLER, L.; ARNOLD, D. An HPSG Account of Closest Conjunct Agreement in NP Coordination in Portuguese. In: MÜLLER, S. (Ed.). Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 2005. p. 427-447.
WECHSLER, S.; ZLATIĆ, L. A Theory of Agreement and its application to Serbo-Croatian. Language, v. 76, n. 4, p. 391-423, 2001.
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2021 Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos
Descargas
