Palabras clave
Cómo citar
Resumen
Tanto no campo da Filosofia da Linguagem, quando no da Lingüística, a questão da referência recebe tratamento diversificado: para uns, a referência é concebida a partir de um modelo de correspondência entre as palavras do discurso e os objetos do mundo; para outros, a referência é o resultado de um processo dinâmico e sobretudo intersubjetivo. Enquanto que a primeira posição encontra abrigo em uma longa tradição lógico-filosófica, a segunda se caracteriza por reflexões advindas das ciências humanas e sociais, empiricamente sustentadas e discutidas. Tomada a referência como prática, vista a partir da atividade e não a partir do sistema da língua, o deslocamento teórico da questão é capaz de, entre outras coisas, colocar em xeque a distinção entre o que é intra e extra-discursivo.Citas
ANDERSON, S.R. & E.L. Keenan (1985). “Deixis”, in Shopen, T. (ed. ), Language Typology and Syntactic Description. III. Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 259-308.
BALL, M. (2000). The visual availability and local organization of public surveillance systems: the promotion of social order in public space. Sociological Research Online (www. socresonline. org. uk), 5 (1).
CHAROLLES, M. (2002). La référence et les expressions référentielles en français. Paris: Ophrys.
CLARK, H. H. & BRENNAN, S.E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L.B. Resnick &J. Levine & S. D. Behreno (Eds. ), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. Washington: American Psychological Association.
CLARK, H.H. & WILKES-GIBBS, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1-39.
DIK, S.C. (1989). The Theory of Functional Grammar, Dordrecht: Fortis.
FORD, C.E. & FOX, B.A. (1996). Interactional motivation for reference formulation: he had. This guy had, a beautiful, thirty-two O: lds. In B. Fox (Ed. ), Studies in Anaphora. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
GELUYKENS, R. (1995). On establishing reference in conversation. In R. A. Geiger (Ed. ), Reference in Multidisciplinary Perspective. Philosophical Object, Cognitive Subject, Intersubjective Process (pp. 230-240). Hildesheim: Georg Olms.
GIVON, T. (1992). The grammar of referential coherence as mental processing instructions. Linguistics, 30 (5-55).
GOODWIN, C. (1994). Professional Vision. American Anthropologist, 96 (3), 606-633.
GOODWIN, C. & Goodwin, M.H. (1996). Seeing as a situated activity: Formulating planes. In D. Middleton & Y. Engestrom (Eds. ), Cognition and Communication at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
GUNDEL, J.K.; HEDBERG, N. & ZACHARSKI, R. (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69, 279-307.
HARTSWOOD, M.; PROCTER, R.; ROUNCEFIELD, M. & SLACK, R. (2000). Interactional Practices in Breast Screening Work: A Case Study of Accountability and Professional Vision. Paper presented at the Paper given at the Medical Interaction Conference University of Southern Denmark, October 2000.
KOCH, I.G.V. (1989). A coesão textual. Sao Paulo: Contexto.
KOCH, I.G.V. (1993). A inter-ação pela linguagem. Sao Paulo: Contexto.
KOCH, I.G.V. (1997). O texto e a construção dos sentidos. Sao Paulo: Contexto. Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
LAMBRECHT K. (1994). Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
LAMBRECHT K. (1986). Topic, Focus, and the Grammar of Spoken French, PhD Berkeley, Ann Arbor: UMI.
LANGACKER, R.W. (1990). Concept, Image and Symbol. The Cognitive Basis of Grammar, Berlin: De Gruyter.
LUFF, P. & HEATH, C. (1993). System use and social organisation: observations on human-computer interaction in an architectural practice. In G. Button (Ed. ), Technology in working order: studies of work, interaction and technology. London: Routledge.
LUFF, P. & HEATH, C. (2000). The collaborative production of computer commands in command and control. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, 52, 669-699.
LUFF, P.; HEATH, C. & JIROTKA, M. (2000). Surveying the scene: Technologies for everyday awareness and monitoring in control rooms. Interacting with Computers, 13, 193-228.
LYNCH, M. (1988). The externalized retina: Selection and mathematization in the visual documentation of objects in the life sciences. Human Studies, 11, 201-234.
MONDADA, L. (1994). Verbalisation de l’espace et fabrication du savoir: Approche linguistique de la construction des objets de discours, Lausanne: Université de Lausanne, 670p.
MONDADA, L. (2001a). “Intervenir à distance dans une opération chirurgicale: l’organisation interactive d’espaces de participation”. Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée, 74, 33-56.
MONDADA, L. (2001b). “Pour une linguistique interactionnelle”, Marges Linguistiques, no 1, mai. (http://www.marges-linguistiques.com) (tr esp. “Por una lingüística interaccional”, Discurso y Sociedad, 3/3, 2001, 61-90)
MONDADA, L. (2002). “Gestion du topic et organisation de la conversation”, Cadernos de Estudos Lingüísticos, Campinas, 41, 7-38.
MONDADA, L. (à paraître a). “Deixis spatiale, gestes de pointage et formes de coordination de l’action”, In: Barbéris, J. -M. , Manes-Gallo, M. C. (éds. ), Verbalisation de l’espace et cognition située: la description d’itinéraires piétons, Paris: Editions CNRS.
MONDADA, L. (à paraître b). “Parler topical et organisation séquentielle: l’apport de l’analyse conversationnelle”. Verbum.
MONDADA, L. (à paraître c). “Seeing for Saying. On the Discursive Construction of Knowledge in Travel Writing”, in H. Schulz-Forberg (ed. ), Unravelling Civilisation. European Travel and Travel Writing.
MONDADA, L. (à paraître d). “Working with video: how surgeons produce video records of their actions”, Visual Studies (special issue edited by M. Ball).
NELSON, R.J. (1992). Naming and Reference. The Link of Word to Object. London: Routledge.
OOSTEN VAN, J. (1986). The Nature of Subjects, Topics and Agents: A Cognitive Explanation, Bloomington: IULC.
PEKAREK, S. (1998). Linguistic forms and social interaction: Why do we specify referents more than is necessary for their identification? In J. Verschueren (Ed. ), Pragmatics in 1998. Selected Papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference (pp. 427-447). Antwerpen: IPrA.
SCHIFFRIN, D. (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
SUCHMAN, L. (1996). Constituting shared workspaces. In D. Middleton & Y. Engestrom (Eds. ), Cognition and Communication at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Se otorgan a la Revista CADERNOS DE ESTUDOS LINGÜÍSTICOS todos los derechos de autor relativos a los trabajos publicados. No se devolverán los originales. En virtud de su aparición en esta revista de acceso abierto, los artículos son de uso gratuito, con la debida atribución, en aplicaciones educativas y no comerciales.
Descargas
