Palavras-chave
Pedagogia engajada
Participação ativa
Como Citar
Resumo
Aprender através da técnica de dança tem o potencial de transformar estudantes, tanto em termos das suas capacidades corporais como em termos da percepção de si no mundo. Através de uma exploração do "como" da pedagogia da dança, esta pesquisa investiga o aprendizado da técnica de dança por relatos de estudantes de graduação e reflexão dos professores / pesquisadores do Conservatório Trinity Laban de Música e Dança, em Londres. As experiências em várias camadas de sete alunos participantes são centrais, trazendo compreensão das formas complexas pelas quais a transformação pode ser habilitada na pedagogia da técnica de dança. As perspectivas teóricas da pedagogia engajada e da ética do cuidado proporcionam uma estrutura através da qual os dados dos alunos participantes são organizados. Participação ativa, demonstração de cuidados e ambientes estimulantes são discutidos em termos da nuance da experiência de cada aluno. A abordagem da interpretação fenomenológica é usada neste estudo longitudinal em que o professor / pesquisador localiza-se como sujeito e co-participante.
Referências
Anttila, E. (2010). Dialogical pedagogy, embodied knowledge, and meaningful learning. In Dance in a world of change: Reflections on globalization and cultural difference, ed. S. Shapiro, 159–179. Leeds: Human Kinetics.
Albright, A. C. (2011). Situated dancing: Notes from three decades in contact with phenomenology. Dance Research Journal 43(2):7–18.
Alexander, H. (2013). Caring and agency: Noddings on happiness in education. Educational Philosophy and Theory 45(5):488–493.
Bales, M., and R. Nettl-Fiol, eds. (2008). The body eclectic: Evolving practices in dance training. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.
Bannon, F. (2004). Towards creative practice in research in dance education. Research in Dance Education 5(1):25–43.
Barbour, K. (2011). Dancing across the page: Narrative and embodied ways of knowing. Bristol, UK: Intellect.
Barr, S. (2009). Examining the technique class: Re-examining feedback. Research in Dance Education 10(1):33–45.
Barr, S. (2013). Learning to learn: A hidden dimension within community dance practice. Journal of Dance Education 13(4):115–121.
Barr, S. (2015). Collaborative practices in dance research: Unpacking the process. Research in Dance Education 16(1):51–66.
Barr, S., and D. Risner. (2014). Weaving social foundations through dance pedagogy: A pedagogy of uncovering. Journal of Dance Education 14(4):136–145.
Belenky, M. F., B. M. Clinchy, N. R. Goldberger, and J. M. Tarule. (2006). Connected teaching. In The institution of education, eds. H. S. Shapiro, K. Latham, and S. N. Ross, fifth edition, 125–135. Boston, MA: Pearson Custom Publishing.
Bozalek, V., W. McMillan, D. E. Marshall, M. November, A. Daniels, and T. Sylvester. (2014). Analysing the professional development of teaching and learning from a political ethics of care perspective. Teaching in Higher Education 19(5):447–458.
Brookfield, S. (2003a). Putting the critical back into critical pedagogy: A commentary on the path of dissent. Journal of Transformative Education 1(2):141–149.
Brookfield, S. (2003b). The praxis of transformative education: African American feminist conceptualizations. Journal of Transformative Education 1(3):212–226.
Cheesman, S. (2016). Empowerment through risk. Journal of Dance Education 16(1):12–19.
Collen, R. L. (2002). Handle with care: A pedagogical theory of touch in teaching dance technique based on four case studies. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Texas Woman’s University.
Danowitz, M. A., and F. Tuitt. (2011). Enacting inclusivity through engaged pedagogy: A higher education perspective. Equity and Excellence in Education 44(1):40–56.
Dirkx, J. M. (1998). Transformative learning theory in the practice of adult education: An overview. PAACE Journal of Lifelong Learning 7:1–14.
Dryburgh, J., and L. H. Jackson. (2016). Building a practice of learning together: Expanding the functions of feedback with the use of the flipchart in contemporary dance technique. Research in Dance Education 17(2): 130-144.
Dyer, B. (2010). The perils, privileges and pleasures of seeking right from wrong: Reflecting upon student perspectives of social processes, value systems, agency and the becoming of identity in the dance technique classroom. Research in Dance Education 11(2):109–129.
Dyer, B. (2014). Exploring social and moral learning frameworks through collaborative inquiry. Journal of Dance Education 14(2):45–51.
Dyer, B., and T. Löytönen. (2012). Engaging dialogue: Co-creating communities of collaborative inquiry. Research in Dance Education 13(1):121–147.
Ellis, C. (2007). Telling stories, revealing lives: Relational ethics in research with intimate others. Qualitative Inquiry 13(1):3–29.
Engelmann, D. (2009). Another look at a feminist ethics of teaching. Atlantis 33(2):62–71.
Enghauser, R.G. (2012). Tracing lines of meaning: A course redesign for dance pedagogy. Journal of Dance Education 12(2):54–61.
Freire, P. (1993). Pedagogy of the oppressed. London, UK: Penguin.
Gardner, S. K. (2008). “What’s too much and what’s too little?”: The process of becoming an independent researcher in doctoral education. The Journal of Higher Education 79(3):326–350.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s moral development. Cambridge, UK: Harvard University Press.
Green, J. (2015). Somatic sensitivity and reflexivity as validity tools in qualitative research. Research in Dance Education 16(1):67–79.
Guillemin, M., and L. Gillam. (2004). Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry 10(2):261–280.
Hooks, b. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. London, UK: Routledge.
Johannesen, R. L. (2000). Nel Noddings’s uses of Martin Buber’s philosophy of dialogue. Southern Communication Journal 65(2–3):151–160.
Kahlich L. C. (2001). Dance education and democracy. Journal of Dance Education 1(3):93–95.
Kerr-Berry, J., K. Clemente, and D. Risner. (2008). The politics of personal pedagogy: Examining teacher identities. Journal of Dance Education 8(3):94–101.
Leonard A. E. (2014). Democratic bodies: Exemplary practice and democratic education in a K–5 dance residency. Journal of Dance Education 14(1):1–7.
Lovitts B. E. (2005). Being a good course‐taker is not enough: A theoretical perspective on the transition to independent research. Studies in Higher Education 30(2):137–154.
Marquez, I. (1998). Dance education in/and the postmodern. In Dance, power, and difference: Critical and feminist perspectives on dance education, ed. S. Shapiro, 171–185. Leeds, UK: Human Kinetics.
Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
McGregor, C. (2004). Care(full) deliberation: A pedagogy for citizenship. Journal of Transformative Education 2(2):90–106.
Morris, A. (2012). Seeking new ways of living community in the classroom and the world: An action research study. Research in Dance Education 13(2):235–251.
Noddings, N. (2013). Caring: A relational approach to ethics and moral education. Second edition. London, UK: University of California Press.
Owen, L. M., and C. D. Ennis. (2005). The ethic of care in teaching: An overview of supportive literature. Quest 57(4):392–425.
Østern, T. P., and E. Øyen. (2015). Moving through change. Choreographic Practices 6(1):125–144.
Råman, T. (2009). Collaborative learning in the dance technique class. Research in Dance Education 10(1):75–87.
Risner, D. (2008). The politics of gender in dance pedagogy. Journal of Dance Education 8(3):94–97.
Savin-Baden, M., and C. Howell Major. (2013). Qualitative research: The essential guide to theory and practice. London, UK: Routledge.
Schupp, K. (2010). Bridging the gap: Helping students from competitive dance training backgrounds become successful dance majors. Journal of Dance Education 10(1):25-28.
Shapiro, S. B. (1998). Toward transformative teachers: Critical and feminist perspectives in dance education. In Dance, power, and difference: Critical and feminist perspectives on dance education, ed. S. Shapiro, 7–22. Leeds, UK: Human Kinetics.
Shor, I., and P. Freire. (1987). A pedagogy for liberation: Dialogues on transforming education. London: Bergin and Garvey Publishers.
Stinson, S. W. (1998). Seeking a feminist pedagogy for children’s dance. In Dance, power, and difference: Critical and feminist perspectives on dance education, ed. S. Shapiro, 23–47. Leeds, UK: Human Kinetics.
Stinson, S.W. (2016). Embodied curriculum theory and research in arts education: A dance scholar’s search for meaning. Aargau, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Warburton, E. C. (2004). Who cares? Teaching and learning care in dance. Journal of Dance Education 4(3):88–96.
Zembylas, M., V. Bozalek, and T. Shefer. (2014). Tronto’s notion of privileged irresponsibility and the reconceptualization of care: Implications for critical pedagogies of emotion in higher education. Gender and Education 26(3):200–214.
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2019 Jamieson Dryburgh
Downloads
