Abstract
This paper aims to address a training experience in the area of education related to classic epistemological concepts, that is, related to the production and legitimation of scientific knowledge. It refers to the extracurricular discipline "Logic and Methodology of Social Sciences" taught in the Postgraduate Program in Education of Unochapecó at the beginning of 2020. Most of the participants were master's students in the Stricto Sensu Postgraduate Program in Education of Unochapecó, but there were also participants from other stricto sensu graduate programs of the institution, such as Health Sciences, as well as students from other universities in the region. The course was intended to be original in the sense that instead of focusing on theoretical aspects and typical discussions of epistemology, it directed attention to the practical applications of these ideas in the construction of a master's thesis. This paper describes that experience, exposes the pedagogical strategy used to achieve the objective of the course and evaluates its results. Thus, the article will begin with a description of its theoretical-methodological framework, then it will present the selected epistemological concepts with a focus on their usefulness for the construction of the thesis and in the partial evaluations carried out by the students and, finally, the definitive results will be presented.
References
COPI, Irving; COHEN, Carl. Introducción a la lógica. Ed. Limusa, México, 2013.
COPI, Irving. Introducción a la lógica. Buenos Aires: Eudeba, 1992.
FARIAS, Fernando. La epistemología de las ciencias sociales en la formación por competencias del pregrado. Cinta de Moevio, n. 34, p. 58-66, 2009.
GIANELLA DE SAMALA. Lógica simbólica y elementos de metodología de la ciencia. Ed Cooperativas, Buenos Aires, 2002.
GAETA, Rodolfo; ROBLES, Nilda. Nociones de epistemología. Buenos Aires: Eudeba, 1990.
GAETA, Rodolfo; GENTILE, Nelida. Thomas Kuhn: de los paradigmas a la teoría evolucionista. Buenos Aires: Eudeba, 2007.
HEMPEL, Carl. Filosofía de la ciencia natural. Madrid: Alianza, 1983.
POPPER, Karl. La lógica de la investigación científica. Ed. Tecnos, Madrid, 1980.
KLIMOVSKY, Gregorio. Las desventuras del conocimiento científico. Buenos Aires: A-Z Editora, 2005.
KUHN, Thomas. La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. México: FCE, 2004.
MIRÓ QUESADA, F. La lógica paraconsistente y el problema de la racionalidad de la lógica. En MIRO QUESADA F.; CARRION, R.; (eds). Antología de la lógica en América Latina. Madrid: Fundación Banco Exterior, p. 593-622, 1988.
SERNA DIMAS, Adrián. Algunos debates epistemológicos en la investigación social contemporánea. Polisemia, n. 14, Bogotá, p-28-63, 2012.
VARGAS JIMÉNEZ, Ileana, La entrevista en la investigación cualitativa: nuevas tendencias y retos. Revista CAES Vol.3I, No. 1, p. 119-139, 2011.
VEIGA-NETO, Alfredo. Paradigmas? Cuidado com eles. In: COSTA, M. V. (Org.). Caminhos investigativos II: outros modos de pensar e fazer pesquisa em educação. 2. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Lamparina, 2007.
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Internacional de Educação Superior