Palavras-chave
Como Citar
Resumo
Tanto no campo da Filosofia da Linguagem, quando no da Lingüística, a questão da referência recebe tratamento diversificado: para uns, a referência é concebida a partir de um modelo de correspondência entre as palavras do discurso e os objetos do mundo; para outros, a referência é o resultado de um processo dinâmico e sobretudo intersubjetivo. Enquanto que a primeira posição encontra abrigo em uma longa tradição lógico-filosófica, a segunda se caracteriza por reflexões advindas das ciências humanas e sociais, empiricamente sustentadas e discutidas. Tomada a referência como prática, vista a partir da atividade e não a partir do sistema da língua, o deslocamento teórico da questão é capaz de, entre outras coisas, colocar em xeque a distinção entre o que é intra e extra-discursivo.Referências
ANDERSON, S.R. & E.L. Keenan (1985). “Deixis”, in Shopen, T. (ed. ), Language Typology and Syntactic Description. III. Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 259-308.
BALL, M. (2000). The visual availability and local organization of public surveillance systems: the promotion of social order in public space. Sociological Research Online (www. socresonline. org. uk), 5 (1).
CHAROLLES, M. (2002). La référence et les expressions référentielles en français. Paris: Ophrys.
CLARK, H. H. & BRENNAN, S.E. (1991). Grounding in communication. In L.B. Resnick &J. Levine & S. D. Behreno (Eds. ), Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition. Washington: American Psychological Association.
CLARK, H.H. & WILKES-GIBBS, D. (1986). Referring as a collaborative process. Cognition, 22, 1-39.
DIK, S.C. (1989). The Theory of Functional Grammar, Dordrecht: Fortis.
FORD, C.E. & FOX, B.A. (1996). Interactional motivation for reference formulation: he had. This guy had, a beautiful, thirty-two O: lds. In B. Fox (Ed. ), Studies in Anaphora. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
GELUYKENS, R. (1995). On establishing reference in conversation. In R. A. Geiger (Ed. ), Reference in Multidisciplinary Perspective. Philosophical Object, Cognitive Subject, Intersubjective Process (pp. 230-240). Hildesheim: Georg Olms.
GIVON, T. (1992). The grammar of referential coherence as mental processing instructions. Linguistics, 30 (5-55).
GOODWIN, C. (1994). Professional Vision. American Anthropologist, 96 (3), 606-633.
GOODWIN, C. & Goodwin, M.H. (1996). Seeing as a situated activity: Formulating planes. In D. Middleton & Y. Engestrom (Eds. ), Cognition and Communication at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
GUNDEL, J.K.; HEDBERG, N. & ZACHARSKI, R. (1993). Cognitive status and the form of referring expressions in discourse. Language, 69, 279-307.
HARTSWOOD, M.; PROCTER, R.; ROUNCEFIELD, M. & SLACK, R. (2000). Interactional Practices in Breast Screening Work: A Case Study of Accountability and Professional Vision. Paper presented at the Paper given at the Medical Interaction Conference University of Southern Denmark, October 2000.
KOCH, I.G.V. (1989). A coesão textual. Sao Paulo: Contexto.
KOCH, I.G.V. (1993). A inter-ação pela linguagem. Sao Paulo: Contexto.
KOCH, I.G.V. (1997). O texto e a construção dos sentidos. Sao Paulo: Contexto. Lambrecht, K. (1994). Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
LAMBRECHT K. (1994). Information Structure and Sentence Form. Topic, Focus, and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
LAMBRECHT K. (1986). Topic, Focus, and the Grammar of Spoken French, PhD Berkeley, Ann Arbor: UMI.
LANGACKER, R.W. (1990). Concept, Image and Symbol. The Cognitive Basis of Grammar, Berlin: De Gruyter.
LUFF, P. & HEATH, C. (1993). System use and social organisation: observations on human-computer interaction in an architectural practice. In G. Button (Ed. ), Technology in working order: studies of work, interaction and technology. London: Routledge.
LUFF, P. & HEATH, C. (2000). The collaborative production of computer commands in command and control. Int. J. Human-Computer Studies, 52, 669-699.
LUFF, P.; HEATH, C. & JIROTKA, M. (2000). Surveying the scene: Technologies for everyday awareness and monitoring in control rooms. Interacting with Computers, 13, 193-228.
LYNCH, M. (1988). The externalized retina: Selection and mathematization in the visual documentation of objects in the life sciences. Human Studies, 11, 201-234.
MONDADA, L. (1994). Verbalisation de l’espace et fabrication du savoir: Approche linguistique de la construction des objets de discours, Lausanne: Université de Lausanne, 670p.
MONDADA, L. (2001a). “Intervenir à distance dans une opération chirurgicale: l’organisation interactive d’espaces de participation”. Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliquée, 74, 33-56.
MONDADA, L. (2001b). “Pour une linguistique interactionnelle”, Marges Linguistiques, no 1, mai. (http://www.marges-linguistiques.com) (tr esp. “Por una lingüística interaccional”, Discurso y Sociedad, 3/3, 2001, 61-90)
MONDADA, L. (2002). “Gestion du topic et organisation de la conversation”, Cadernos de Estudos Lingüísticos, Campinas, 41, 7-38.
MONDADA, L. (à paraître a). “Deixis spatiale, gestes de pointage et formes de coordination de l’action”, In: Barbéris, J. -M. , Manes-Gallo, M. C. (éds. ), Verbalisation de l’espace et cognition située: la description d’itinéraires piétons, Paris: Editions CNRS.
MONDADA, L. (à paraître b). “Parler topical et organisation séquentielle: l’apport de l’analyse conversationnelle”. Verbum.
MONDADA, L. (à paraître c). “Seeing for Saying. On the Discursive Construction of Knowledge in Travel Writing”, in H. Schulz-Forberg (ed. ), Unravelling Civilisation. European Travel and Travel Writing.
MONDADA, L. (à paraître d). “Working with video: how surgeons produce video records of their actions”, Visual Studies (special issue edited by M. Ball).
NELSON, R.J. (1992). Naming and Reference. The Link of Word to Object. London: Routledge.
OOSTEN VAN, J. (1986). The Nature of Subjects, Topics and Agents: A Cognitive Explanation, Bloomington: IULC.
PEKAREK, S. (1998). Linguistic forms and social interaction: Why do we specify referents more than is necessary for their identification? In J. Verschueren (Ed. ), Pragmatics in 1998. Selected Papers from the 6th International Pragmatics Conference (pp. 427-447). Antwerpen: IPrA.
SCHIFFRIN, D. (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
SUCHMAN, L. (1996). Constituting shared workspaces. In D. Middleton & Y. Engestrom (Eds. ), Cognition and Communication at Work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
O periódico Cadernos de Estudos Linguísticos utiliza a licença do Creative Commons (CC), preservando assim, a integridade dos artigos em ambiente de acesso aberto.
Downloads
