Social facts as sculptures
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Antropologia da arte. Forma. Primitivismo. Sagrado. Ritual.

How to Cite

GUIDI, Tiago. Social facts as sculptures. MODOS, Campinas, SP, v. 3, n. 3, p. 210–226, 2019. DOI: 10.24978/mod.v3i3.4200. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/mod/article/view/8663194. Acesso em: 3 jul. 2024.

Abstract

This article proposes a pairing of two classical texts – Elementary Forms of Religious Life (1912), by Émile Durkheim, and Negerplastik (1915), by Carl Einstein –, of two apparently distant disciplines – anthropology and art history – in order to trace points of convergence and divergence among these two modes of knowledge. Both texts are grounded on the difference between the sacred and the profane, and describe thoroughly the process through which the sacred is necessarily externalized in an object, giving it not only a representation, but also a presence in the world of senses. The durkheimean approach will emphasize the transcendence of social-religious phenomenon, whereas the einsteinean approach will take a further look on the materiality itself of the sacred. These differences of analysis allow us to sketch the contours of two different epistemes, e their respective implications on theory and method. That is: what are the questions posed by anthropology in face of the sacred object? What are the questions posed by art history in the face of the sacred object?

https://doi.org/10.24978/mod.v3i3.4200
PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

ALVES, J. F. O acervo como protagonista do MARGS. In: HOLTZ, Raul. Museu de Arte do Rio Grande do Sul Ado Malagoli. Catálogo Geral. Porto Alegre: MARGS, 2013.

BOURRIAUD, N. Estética relacional. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2009.

DURKHEIM, E. The Division of Labor in Society. New York: The Free Press. [1893] 1997.

DURKHEIM, E. The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: Oxford University Press. [1912] 2001.

______. As regras do método sociológico. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1999.

______. As formas elementares da vida religiosa. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2003.

EINSTEIN, C. Negerplastik. Leipzig: Verlag der weissen Bücher, 1915. Tradução francesa de Liliane Meffre publicado em Travaux et Mémoires du Centre de Recherches Historiques sur les relations artistiques entre les cultures, fasc.1, Université de Paris 1, Paris 1976, republicado sob o título La sculpture nègre em Qu'est-ce que la sculpture moderne? Catálogo de exposição, Centre Georges Pompidou, Musée National d'Art Moderne, Paris, 1986.

EINSTEIN, C. Negro Sculpture. Translated by Charles W. Haxthausen and Sebastian Zeidler. October 107, Inverno 2004.

EINSTEIN, C. Negerplastik. Tradução Inês de Araújo. Organização e Introdução de Liliane Meffre. Tradução de Fernando Scheibe. Florianópolis: Ed. da UFSC, 2011.

EINSTEIN, C. Carl Einstein e a Arte da África (org. Elena O‟Neill e Roberto Conduru). Rio de Janeiro: Ed. UERJ, 2017.

FOSTER, H. The Artist as Ethnographer?. MARCUS, G.; MYERS, F.R. (eds.). Traffic in Culture: refiguring Art and Anthropology. Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1995.

HEMNETT, I. Durkheim and Modern Sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1984.

GELL, A. Art and Agency: an Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998.

KOSUTH, J. Artist as Anthropologist [1975]. In: The Everyday: Documents of Contemporary Art, Stephen Johnstone (ed.). Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2008.

LEIRIS, M. The Discovery of African Art in the West. In: African Art. New York: Golden Press, 1968.

LÉVI-STRAUSS, C. Antropologia estrutural, São Paulo: Ed. Ubu: 2018.

HENNION, A. ; LATOUR, B. Objet d'art, objet de science. Note sur les limites de l'anti-fetichisme. Paris: L'Harmattan, 1993.

RADCLIFFE-BROWN, R. Estrutura e função na sociedade primitiva. Coleção Antropologia. Petrópolis: Vozes, 1973.

MEFFRE, L. Carl Einstein 1885-1940. Itinéraires d’une pensée moderne. Paris: Presses de l’Université Paris-Sorbonne, 2002.

WAGNER, R. The Anthropology of the Subject: Holographic Worldview in New Guinea and its Meaning and Significance for the World of Anthropology. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2001.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2019 MODOS

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.