Palavras-chave
Acesso aberto
Livros eletrônicos
Bibliotecas universitárias
Como Citar
Resumo
Introdução: A comunicação científica em ciências sociais e humanas desenvolveu-se através de publicações monográficas. Nas últimas décadas, os livros eletrônicos ganharam destaque na comunicação nessas áreas. Objetivo: Dada a importância da criação de uma ciência mais democrática e da consolidação e avanços do acesso aberto apresentados nos últimos tempos, esta pesquisa identifica o estado atual do conhecimento científico sobre a produção, distribuição e uso do acesso eletrônico ao livro nas áreas de ciências sociais e humanas. Metodologia: Baseado em uma abordagem metodológica qualitativa, o estudo utilizou o método de revisão sistemática da literatura (RSL) com as bases de dados Library and Information Science Abstracts (LISA) e Scopus, que possui reconhecimento internacional nas áreas de ciência da informação, ciências sociais e humanidades. Resultados: Foram verificados quarenta e dois artigos que abordavam os temas analisados com base nos protocolos SLR definidos e na ferramenta StArt. Conclusão: Concluiu-se que a área de ciências sociais e humanas tem utilizado livros digitais de acesso aberto em suas pesquisas, sendo as bibliotecas acadêmicas e a editora universitária os principais atores na sua distribuição. Além disso, persistem alguns obstáculos tecnológicos, sociais e econômicos na utilização e produção de estudos sobre o tema devido à sua reduzida importância em comparação com pesquisas em periódicos de acesso aberto em diversas outras áreas do conhecimento.
Referências
ADEMA, J; SCHMIDT, B. From service providers to content producers: New opportunities for libraries in collaborative open access book publishing. New Review of Academic Librarianship, London, v. 16, n. SUPPL. 1, p. 28–43, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2010.509542.
AYRIS, P. Open access e-books: The role of the institution. Insights: the UKSG Journal, London, v. 27, n. suppl. 1, p. 7–10, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.140.
BARGHEER, M et al. Unlocking the digital potential of scholarly monographs in 21st century research. LIBER Quarterly, Amsterdam, v. 27, n. 1, p. 194–211, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.10174.
BARUCHSON-ARBIB, S; BRONSTEIN, J. Humanists as information users in the digital age: the case of jewish studies scholars in Israel. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Hoboken, NJ, v. 58, n. 14, p. 2269–2279, 2007. Disponível em: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/asi.20699. Acesso em: 27 set. 2022.
BIOLCHINI, J. C. et al. Scientific research ontology to support systematic review in software engineering. Advanced Engineering Informatics, Oxford, UK, v. 21, n. 2, p. 133–151, 2007. Disponível em: https://encurtador.com.br/gsvxZ. Acesso em: 18 mar. 2022.
BUDD, J. M.; CHRISTENSEN, C. Social sciences literature and electronic information. Libraries and the Academy, Baltimore, MA, v. 3, n. 4, p. 643–651, 2003. Disponível em: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/49289. Acesso em: 27 set. 2022.
COSTA, S. Changes in the information dissemination process within the scholarly world: the impact of electronic publishing on scholarly communities of academic social scientists. In: ELPUB CONFERENCE ON ELECTRONIC PUBLISHING, 4., 2000, Rússia. Proceedings of the […]. Russia: ICCC Press, 2000. Disponível em: https://encurtador.com.br/vNQ59. Acesso em: 14 jun. 2021.
COSTA, M. P.; LEITE, F. C. L. Acesso aberto no mundo e na américa latina: uma revisão a partir da budapest open access initiative. Transinformação, Campinas, SP, v. 28, n. 1, p. 33–45, 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/2318-08892016002800003.
CRESWELL, J. W. Projeto de pesquisa: métodos qualitativo, quantitativo e misto. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2010.
CROSSICK, G. Monographs and open access. Insights: the UKSG Journal, Londo, v. 29, n. 1, p. 14–19, 2016. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.280.
DAVIES, P.M.C.R. Calibrating the parameters: Changing hearts and minds about open access monographs. Insights: the UKSG Journal, Londo, v. 27, n. suppl. 1, p. 4–6, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.141.
EVE, M P et al. Cost estimates of an open access mandate for monographs in the UK’s third Research Excellence Framework. Insights: the UKSG Journal, London, v. 30, n. 3, p. 89–102, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1629/uksg.392.
EVE, M. P. Open access and the humanities: contexts, controversies and the future. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/
CBO9781316161012.
EVE, M. P. Open Access publishing and scholarly communications in non-scientific disciplines. Online Information Review, Leeds, UK, v.39, n.5, p.717-732, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/OIR-04-2015-0103.
FABBRI, S. et al. Improvements in the StArt tool to better support the systematic review process. ACM International Conference Proceeding Series, New York, v. 01-03, Jun. 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2915970.2916013.
FATHALLAH, J. Open access monographs: myths, truths and implications in the wake of ukri open access policy. LIBER Quarterly, Amsterdam, v. 32, n. 1, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.53377/lq.11068.
FERWERDA, E. New models for monographs - Open books. Serials, Witney, UK,v. 23, n. 2, p. 91–96, 2010. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1629/2391.
FERWERDA, E. Open access monograph business models. Insights: the UKSG Journal, London, v. 27, n. suppl. 1, p. 35–38, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.46.
FERWERDA, E. A project exploring Open Access monograph publishing in the Netherlands: final report. Netherlands: OAPEN Foundation, 2013. Disponível em: https://openreflections.files.wordpress.com/2011/03/oapen-nl-final-report.pdf. Acesso em: 16 set. 2022.
FOLSTER, M. B. Information seeking patterns: social sciences. Reference Librarian, London, v. 23, n. 49–50, p. 83–93, 1995. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J120v23n49_06.
FRANKL, J. Towards an Author-Centered Open Access Monograph Program: Understanding Open Access Cultures in Scholarly Publishing. Journal of Electronic Publishing, Ann Arbor, v. 26, n. 1, p. 47–76, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/jep.3332.
FUND, S. Stop, look, listen-learning from knowledge unlatched 2016: Making OA Work. Against the Grain, Charleston, v. 29, n. 3, 2017.
GARVEY, W. D. Communication: the essence of science: facilitating information exchange among librarians, scientists, engineers and students. New York: Pergamon Press, 1979.
GEORGIOU, P; TSAKONAS, G. Digital scholarly publishing and archiving services by academic libraries: Case study of the University of Patras. LIBER Quarterly, London, v. 20, n. 2, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18352/lq.7991.
GILLIAM, C; DAOUTIS, C. Can openly accessible E-theses be published as monographs? A short survey of academic publishers. Serials Librarian, London, v. 75, n. 1–4, p. 5–12, 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0361526X.2019.1589633.
GRANT, M. J.; BOOTH, A. A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, Chichester, v. 26, n. 2, p. 91–108, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.
HACKER, D. A. Building it together: Collaboration in university-based open access book publishing. Insights: the UKSG Journal, London, v. 27, n. suppl. 1, p. 26–29, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1629/2048-7754.120.
HARNAD, S. Mandates and metrics: how open repositories enable universities to manage, measure and maximise their research assets. In: UUK RESEARCH INFORMATION AND MANAGEMENT WORKSHOP, 2007, London. Conference of the… London, United Kingdom: [s. n.], 2007. Disponível em: http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/id/eprint/265693. Acesso em: 1 maio 2023. 98 slideshow.
HARTMANN, H. Academic Publishing in the humanities: Current trends in Germany. Logos, Amsterdam, v. 28, n. 2, p. 11–26, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/1878-4712-11112127.
HUANG, M. H.; CHANG, Y. W. Characteristics of research output in social sciences and humanities: from a research evaluation perspective. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Hoboken, NJ, v. 59, n. 11, p. 1819–1828, 2008.
KAVITHA, E. S. A study on knowledge and usage of electronic resources by the SC/ST research scholars and PG students among Periyar University affiliated colleges. Library Philosophy and Practice, Moscow, ID, p. 199, 2018. Disponível em: https://encurtador.com.br/ktCF9. Acesso em: 19 fev. 2022.
KERN, D.; HIENERT, D. Understanding the information needs of social scientists in Germany. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Hoboken, NJ, v. 55, n. 1, p. 234–243, 2018. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.2018.
LEITE, F. C. L. Busca, acesso e disseminação da informação científica de cientistas, cientistas sociais e humanistas. Biblios, Lima, n. 57, p. 22–42, 2014. Disponível em: http://biblios.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/biblios/article/viewFile/195/214. Acesso em: 19 fev. 2022.
LEITE, F. C. L; COSTA, S. M. S. Modelo genérico de gestão da informação científica digital para instituições de pesquisa na perspectiva da comunicação científica e do acesso aberto. In:
COSTA, S. M. S.; LEITE, F. C. L.; TAVARES, R. B. (org.). Comunicação da informação, gestão da informação e gestão do conhecimento. Brasília: Ibict, 2018. p. 339–362. Disponível em: http://livroaberto.ibict.br/handle/123456789/1071. Acesso em: 10 jan. 2022.
LINE, M. B. The information uses and needs of socials cientists; an overview of INFROSS. Aslib Procedings, Bingley, UK, v. 23, n. 8, p. 412–434, 1971. Disponível em: https://encurtador.com.br/cmBOT. Acesso em: 12 mar. 2022.
LOOK, H; PINTER, F. Open access and humanities and social science monograph publishing. New Review of Academic Librarianship, London, v. 16, n. suppl. 1, p. 90–97, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13614533.2010.512244.
MAMÉDIO, Cristina et al. A estratégia PICO para a construção da pergunta de pesquisa e busca de evidências. Rev Latino-am Enferm., Ribeirão Preto, v. 15, n. 3, p. 508–511, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0104-11692007000300023.
MANGAI, G; GANESAN, P. Researchers’ perception and attitude towards Open Access (OA) resources: an alternative model and important for academic and research libraries. Library Philosophy and Practice, Moscow, ID, p. 5681, 2021. Disponível em: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/5681. Acesso em: 9 nov. 2022.
MARYL, M et al. The case for an inclusive scholarly communication infrastructure for social sciences and humanities. F1000Research, London, v. 9, 2020. https://doi.org/10.12688/
f1000research.26545.1.
MEADOWS, A. J. A comunicação científica. Brasília: Briquet de Lemos/Livros, 1999.
PYNE, R. et al. The future of open access books: findings from a global survey of academic book authors. Copyright, Fair Use, Scholarly Communication, etc, 2019. Disponível em: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/scholcom/113. Acesso em: 16 set. 2022.
SERAKAN, U. Research methods for business: a skill-building approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2003.
SHAW, P.; PHILLIPS, A.; GUTIÉRREZ, M. B. The death of the monograph?. Publishing Research Quarterly, New York, v. 38, n. 2, p. 382–395, 2022.
SHAW, P; PHILLIPS, A.; GUTIÉRREZ, M. B. The future of the monograph in the arts, humanities and social sciences: publisher perspectives on a transitioning format. Publishing Research Quarterly, New York, v. 39, n. 1, p. 69–84, 2023. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12109-023-09937-1. Acesso em: 5 nov. 2023.
SPINK, A.; COLE, C. Information and poverty: information-seeking channels used by African American low-income households. Library & Information Science Research, Oxford, v. 23, n. 1, p. 45–65, 2001.DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0740-8188(00)00067-0.
SUBER, P. Timeline of the Open Access Movement. [S. l.], 2022. Disponível em: http://oad.simmons.edu/oadwiki/Timeline. Acesso em: 9 mar. 2022.
TAYLOR, M. An altmetric attention advantage for open access books in the humanities and social sciences. Scientometrics, Budapest, v. 125, n. 3, p. 2523–2543, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-020-03735-8.
WATKINSON, C. University presses and the impact of COVID-19. Learned Publishing, Oxford, UK, v. 34, n. 1, p. 17–24, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1352.
WILSON, T. D. Fifty years of information behavior research. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Silver Spring, MD, v. 36, n. 3, p. 27–34, 2010. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bult.2010.1720360308.
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Ana Flavia Lucas de Faria Kama, Fernando César Lima Leite
Downloads
