Supplementary Files
Keywords
How to Cite
Abstract
The object of this work are the international experiences of implementation of digital preservation practices in repositories. It based on bibliographical survey about the beginning of digital preservation practices in digital repositories, identifying important aspects of how to manage the practices of digital preservation on repositories. Most repositories analyzed showed a double function of access and preservation, but few could be considered to be "dark archives" used only for preservation matters. The application of digital preservation standards showed that large institutions possessed detailed definitions of what stored materials could be filed and used. Repositories managers had some kind of operating budget to carry on preservation activities. Most repositories cited in the bibliography used a combination of commercial tools and free software. As a conclusion, the records analyzed reinforce the need today of the application of digital preservation strategies using the OAIS Reference Model and official audit certification actions on the design of digital preservation repositories, to keep the integration flexibility of functions and services that go beyond the repository.References
BEAGRIE, Charles. “Digital Preservation Policies Study. Part 1: Final Report October 2008. JISC. Disponível em: <http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.214.9056&rep=rep1&
type=pdf>. Acesso em: 10 de junho 2016.
CATALYST. Technical evaluation of selected open source repository solutions on behalf of CPIT. Version 1.3 approved. Wellington, New Zealand: [s. n.], 2006.
CENTER FOR RESEARCH LIBRARIES. Trustworthy Repositories Audit and Certification (TRAC): criteria and checklist (TRAC). 2007. Disponível em: <http://www.crl.edu/content.asp?l1=13&l2=58&l3=162&l4=91>. Acesso em: 14 mar. 2016.
CONSELHO NACIONAL DE ARQUIVOS. 2010. “Recomendações para digitalização de documentos Arquivísticos permanentes”. Conselho Nacional de Arquivos – CONARq. Disponivel em: <http://www.conarq.arquivonacional.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes-do-conarq/273-resolucao-n-31,-de-28-de-abril-de-2010.html>. Acesso em: 15 de maio 2016.
CONSELHO NACIONAL DE ARQUIVOS. 2015. “Diretrizes para implantação de repositórios arquivísticos digitais confiáveis – RDC-Arq.” Câmara Técnica de Documentos Eletrônicos, Rio de Janeiro, Rj.: CONARq. Disponível em: <http://www.conarq.arquivonacional.gov.br/legislacao/resolucoes-do-conarq/335-resolucao-n-43,-de-04-de-setembro-de-2015.html>. Acesso em: 18 de maio 2016.
CORNEL UNIVERSITY LIBRARY. Digital preservation management: implementing short-term strategies for long-term problems. 2004. Disponível em: <http://www.library.cornell.edu/iris/tutorial/dpm/>. Acesso em: 16 nov. 2015.
DOBRATZ, S.; SCHOGER A.; STRATHMANN, S. The nestor catalogue of criteria for trusted digital repository evaluation and certification. JoDI, v. 8, n. 2, 2007. Disponível em: <http://journal.tdl.org/jodi/issue/view/34>. Acesso em: 14 maio 2016.
GIESECKE, J. “Institutional Repositories: Keys to Success. Journal of Library Administration 51:5-6 (2011; Special Issue: Scholarly Communication: Trends Economics and Future), pp 529-542.
Disponível em: <http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1266&context=library
science>. Acesso em: 13 de maio 2016.
GRANGER, S. Digital preservation and deep infrastruc¬ture. D-Lib Magazine, v. 8, n. 2, Feb. 2002. Disponível em: <http://www.dlib.org/dlib/february02/granger/02granger.html>. Acesso em: 28 set. 2015.
HITCHCOCK, S. Metalist of open access e-print archives: the genesis of institutional archives and independent services. ARL Bimonthly Report, n. 227, p. 4-11, Oct. 2003.
HITCHCOCK, S., BRODY, T., HEY, J., CARR, L. (2007) “Laying the fundations for Repository Preservation Services. Disponível em: <http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/preservation
/preserv-final-report1.0.pdf>. Acesso em: 25 junho 2016.
LYNCH, Clifford A. “Institutional Repositories: Essential Infrastructure for Schorlarship in the Digital Age” ARL, no. 226 (February 2003): 1-7. Disponível em: <http://www.arl.org/newsltr/226/ir.html>. Acesso em: 23 de junho 2016.
MCGOVERN, N. Y. A digital decade: where have we been and where are we going in digital preservation? RLG DigiNews, v. 11, n. 1, Apr. 2007. Disponível em: <http://digitalarchive.oclc.org/da/ViewObject.jsp?objid=0000070519&reqid=8514>. Acesso em: 28 ago. 2016.
MESSERSCHMITT, D. Opportunities for Libraries in the NSF Cyberinfrastructure Program. 2003. Disponível em: <http://www.loc.org/standards/mets/>. Acesso em: 14 out. 2016.
MOORE, R. W.; SMITH, M. Automated validation of trusted digital repository assessment criteria. JoDI, v. 8, n. 2, 2007. Disponível em: <http://journal.tdl.org/jodi/issue/view/34>. Acesso em: 21 ago. 2015.
NESTOR WORKING GROUP ON TRUSTED REPOSITORIES CERTIFICATION. Catalogue of criteria for trusted digital repositories. 2006. Disponível em: <http://edoc.hu-berlin.de/series/nestor-materialien/8en/PDF/8enpdf>. Acesso em: 6 nov. 2015.
OCLC/RLG Working Group. 2002. “Trusted Digital Repositories: Attributes and Responsabilities”. Report by the OCLC/RLG Working Group on Digital Archive Attributes. Montain View, CA.: Research Libraries Group, Inc. Disponível em: <http://www.rlg.org> Acesso em: 22 de maio 2016.
OCLC/RLG PREMIS Working Group. 2004. “Implementing Preservation Repositories for Digital Materials: Current Practice and Emerging Trends In the Cultural Heritage Community.” Report by the OCLC/RLG Working Group Preservation Metadata: Implementation Strategies (PREMIS). Dublin, O.: OCLC Online Computer Library Center, Inc. Disponível em: <http://www.oclc.org/research/projects/
pmwg/surveyreport.pdf>. Acesso em: 16 de junho 2016.
PETERS, T. Digital repositories: individual, discipline-based, institutional, consortia, or national? Journal of Academic Librarianship, v. 28, n. 6, p. 414-417, Nov. 2002.
REPOSITORIES SUPPORT PROJECT (RSP) (2008) “Repository Policy Briefing Paper”. Disponível em: <http://www.rsp.ac.uk/pubs/briefingpapers-docs/repoadmin-policy2.pdf>. Acesso em: 13 de julho de 2016.
RLG/NARA “Trustworthy repositories Audit and Certification: Criteria and Checklist”. Disponível em: <http://www.crl.edu/PDF/trac.pdf. 2007>. Acesso em: 21 de julho 2016.
ROSENTHAL D. S. H. et. al. Requirements for digital preservation systems: a bottom-up approach. D-Lib Magazine, v. 11, n. 11, Nov. 2005. Disponível em: <http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november05/rosenthal/11rosenthal.html>. Acesso em: 28 jul. 2016.
SMITH, K. Institutional repositories and e-journal archiving: what are we learning? The Journal of Electronic Publishing, v. 11, n. 1, Winter 2008. Disponível em: <http://hdl.handle.net/2027/spo.3336451.0011.107>. Acesso em: 16 maio 2016.
THOMAZ, K. Repositórios digitais confiáveis e certificação. Arquivistica.net, Rio de Janeiro, v. 3, n. 1, jan./jun.2007. Disponível em: <http://www.arquivistica.net/ojs/viewarticle.php?id=118>. Acesso em: 5 mar. 2016.
UNESCO. Recomendações sobre Software Livre para Repositório e Sistema de Preservação. Paris: UNESCO, 2007.
WHEATLEY, P. A way forward for developments in the digital preservation functions of dspace: options, issues and recommendations. 2003. Disponível em: <http://dspace.org/news/articles/DpAndDSpace.pdf>. Acesso em: 14 jul. 2016.
YALE UNIVERSITY. “Fedora and the preservation of University Records. Disponível em: <http://dca.tufts.edu/features/nhprc/index.html>. Acesso em: 11 de julho de 2016.
RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblitoeconomia e Ciência da Informação / Digital Journal of Library and Information Science uses the Creative Commons (CC) license, thus preserving the integrity of articles in an open access environment, in which:
- This publication reserves the right to modify the original, regarding norms, spelling and grammar, in order to maintain the standards of the language, still respecting author writing style;
- The original documents will not be returned to the authors;
- Published works become Revista Digital de Biblitoeconomia e Ciência da Informação / Digital Journal of Library and Information Science's property, their second partial or full print being subject to expressed authorization by RDBCI's editor;
- The original source of publicaton must be provided at all times;
- The authors are solely responsible fo the views expressed within the document.
Downloads
