Keywords
Scientific information
Data - life cycle
Actor-network theory.
How to Cite
Abstract
This paper discusses how the Open Science has constituted a new approach to the scientific knowledge generation process, based on the collaborative form that scientific production is being created and outreach. Traditional research outcomes such as papers, dissertations and theses, although available in open access, can be compared to a black box, under the Actor-Network Theory (ANT) perspective, since they are considered the final and closed result of a determined researcher's or a research group's analysis. This paper, mainly bibliographic, uses bibliographical and bibliometric research as methods of data treatment, followed by a systematic review of the literature. The aim is to highlight how the research data availability has agency within the science process and the scholarly communication. To this end, some of ANT's concepts are used to identify the role of research data within the network, built of human and nonhuman elements together. As results, this paper evidence how the research data availability provides new information resources, allowed mainly by the scientific activity feedback.
References
ANJOS, Renata Lemos dos; DIAS, Guilherme Ataíde. Atuação dos profissionais da informação no ciclo de vida dos dados - Dataone: um estudo comparado. Inf. Inf., Londrina, v. 24, n. 1, p. 80 – 101, jan./abr. 2019. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1981-8920.2019v24n1p80
ASSOCIATION OF RESEARCH LIBRARIES (ARL). Monograph & Serial Costs in ARL Libraries, 1986-2011*. 2012. Disponível em: http://goo.gl/WMQwvC. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2019.
BALL, Alex. A review of data management lifecycle models (version 1.0). REDm-MED Project Document redm1rep120110ab10. 2012. Batth, United Kingdom: University of Bath. 15p. Disponível em: https://goo.gl/DoUFRM. Acesso em: 12 mar. 2019.
BORGMAN, Christine. L. The conundrum of sharing research data. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, North Carolina, 2012, v. 63, n. 6, p. 1059–1078. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22634.
BOSCH, Stephen; HENDERSON, Katie. Coping with the terrible twins: periodicals price survey 2012. Library Journal, [s.l.], 30 abr. 2012. Disponível em: http://goo.gl/Yv8Jb. Acesso em: 20 mar. 2019.
CALLON, Michel. Society in the making: the study of technology as a tool for sociological analysis. IN: PINCH, Trevor J.; BIJKER, Wiebe E.; HUGHES, Thomas P. The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge (Mass.), MIT, 1993, p. 77-97.
CALLON, Michel. Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In: LAW, John. Power, action and belief: a new sociology of knowledge? London, Routledge, 1986, p.1-29.
CALLON, Michel; LAW, John; RIP, A. How to study the force of science. In: CALLON, M.; LAW, J.; RIP, A. (Eds.) Mapping the dynamics of science and technology. Houndmills: Macmillan Press, 1986, p. 3-15.
CARLSON, Jake. The use of life cycle models in developing and supporting data services. In: RAY, Joyce M. (Ed). Research data management: practical strategies for information professionals. West Lafayette: Purdue University Press, 2014. p. 63-86.
CORTI, Louise; EYNDEN, Veerle Van den; BISHOP, Libby; WOOLLARD, Matthew. The research data lifecycle. In: Managing and Sharing research Data: a Guide to Good Practice. Los Angeles, Sage, 2014. p. 18-23.
CURTY, Renata Gonçalves. As diferentes dimensões do reuso de dados científicos. In: ENCONTRO NACIONAL DE PESQUISA EM CIÊNCIA DA INFORMAÇÃO, 17., 2016, Bahia. Anais... . Bahia: Universidade Federal da Bahia, 2016. p. 1-23. Disponível em: http://www.ufpb.br/evento/index.php/enancib2016/enancib2016/paper/viewFile/4056/2495. Acesso em: 15 mar. 2019.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Guidelines on Open Access to Scientific Publications and Research Data in Horizon 2020. 15 nov. 2016. 2016b. Disponível em: https://goo.gl/RgkJpg. Acesso em: 20 jul. 2018.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. HORIZON 2020 em breves palavras: o programa-quadro de investigação e inovação da UE. 40p. 2014. Disponível em: https://goo.gl/M72BgB. Acesso em: 20 dez. 2018.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. H2020 Programme. H2020 AGA – Annotated Model Grant Agreement. Version 2.1.1. 1st July 2016a. p. 216-219. 2016a. Disponível em: http://goo.gl/SXbKxE. Acesso em: 20 dez. 2018.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Guidelines on Open Access to Scientific Publications and Research Data in Horizon 2020. 15 nov. 2016. 2016b. Disponível em: https://goo.gl/RgkJpg. Acesso em: 20 dez. 2018.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Open innovation, Open Science, open to the world. A vision for Europe. Brussels: European Commission, 2016c. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. Disponível em: https://goo.gl/M72BgB. Acesso em: 20 dez. 2018.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. Study on the economic and technical evolution of the scientific publication markets in Europe: final report. Bruxelles: European Commission, 2006.
FECHER, Benedikt; FRIESIKE, Sascha. Open science: one term five schools of thoughts. In: BARTLING, Sönke; FRIESIKE, Sascha (Org). Opening Science, p. 17–47. Cham: springer international publishing, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00026-8_2. Disponível em: https://goo.gl/3qrg2o. Acesso em: 28 jan. 2019.
FEENBERG, Andrew. Racionalização subversiva: tecnologia, poder e democracia. In: NEDER, Ricardo T. A teoria crítica de Andrew Feenberg: racionalização democrática, poder e tecnologia. Brasília: Observatório do Movimento pela Tecnologia Social na América Latina / CDS / UnB / Capes, 2010, p. 67-95. Disponível em: https://www.sfu.ca/~andrewf/coletanea.pdf. Acesso em: 20 nov. 2018.
FRANÇA, Andre Luiz Dias de; PINHO NETO, Julio Afonso Sá de.; DIAS, Guilherme Ataíde. A Ciência da Informação e o pensamento de Bruno Latour: implicações para a análise de redes sociais. Inf. & Soc.:Est., João Pessoa, v. 25, n. 1, p. 137-144, jan./abr. 2015.
FREITAS, Marília Augusta de; LEITE, Fernando César Lima. Atores do sistema de comunicação científica: apontamentos para discussão de suas funções. Inf. Inf., Londrina, v. 24, n. 1, p. 273 – 299, jan./abr. 2019.
GREEN, Ann G; GUTMANN, Myron P. Building partnerships among social science researchers, institution-based repositories and domain specific data archives. OCLC Systems & Services, International digital library perspectives, n. 23, n.1, 2007, p. 35-53. https://doi.org/10.1108/10650750710720757.
GRIGG, Karen Stanley. Data in the Sciences. In: KELLAM, Lynda; THOMPSON, Kristi, Datalibrarianship: The Academic Data Librarian in Theory and Practice. 2015, p. 179-192.
GUERTIN, Hélène. BERNHARD, Paulette. Les 6 étapes d'un projet de recherche d'information. École de bibliothéconomie et des sciences de l'information (EBSI), Université de Montréal, Québec, 2005. Online. Disponível em: http://www.ebsi.umontreal.ca/jetrouve/projet/index.htm. Acesso em: 02 jan. 2019.
HIGGINS, Sarah. The DCC Curation Lifecycle Model. International Journal Of Digital Curation, Edinburgh, v. 3, n. 1, p.134-140, 2 dez. 2008. Edinburgh University Library. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.2218/ijdc.v3i1.48. Acesso em: 25 fev. 2019.
I2S2 PROJECT. I2S2 Idealised Sceintific Research Activity Lifecycle Model. 2011. Disponível em: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/projects/I2S2/documents/I2S2-ResearchActivityLifecycleModel-110407.pdf. Acesso em: 01 maio 2019.
INDUSTRY CANADA. Seizing Canada’s Moment: Moving Forward in Science, Technology and Innovation. 2014. 68p. Disponível em: https://goo.gl/ZA7MUw. Acesso em: 25 fev. 2019.
INTER-UNIVERSITY CONSORTIUM FOR POLITICAL AND SOCIAL RESEARCH (ICPSR). Guide to Social Science Data Preparation and Archiving: Best Practice Throughout the Data Life Cycle. 5. ed. Ann Arbor, MI, 2012. Disponível em: http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/files/ICPSR/access/dataprep.pdf. Acesso em: 25 jan. 2019.
LATOUR, Bruno. Ciência em ação: como seguir cientistas e engenheiros sociedade afora. São Paulo: UNESP, 2000. 438 p.
LATOUR, Bruno. Como terminar uma tese de sociologia. In: Cadernos de campo, São Paulo, n.14/15, 2006, p. 339-352. Disponível em: http://www.bruno-latour.fr/sites/default/files/downloads/90-DIALOGUE-POR.pdf. Acesso em: 30 jan. 2019.
LATOUR, Bruno. Give me a laboratory and I will raise the world. In: KNORR-CETINA, K. D. ; MULKAY, M. J. Science observed. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1983.
LATOUR, Bruno. La tecnología es la sociedad hecha para que dure. In: DOMENECH, Miquel; TIRADO, Francisco Javier. Sociologia simétrica. Ensayos sobre Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad. Barcelona: Gedisa Editorial, 1998, p. 109-142.
LATOUR, Bruno. One more turn after the social turn… In: MCMULLIN, E. The social dimension of science. Indiana: Indiana University of Notre Dame Press, 1992, p. 272–294.
LATOUR, Bruno. Os objetos tem história? Encontro de Pasteur com Withehead num banho de ácido lático. História, Ciências, Saúde: Manguinhos, v. II, n.1, p.7-26, mar-jun., 1995.
LATOUR, Bruno. Um coletivo de humanos e não-humanos: No labirinto de Dédalo. In: LATOUR, Bruno. A esperança de Pandora: ensaios sobre a realidade dos estudos científicos. Bauru, SP: EDUSC, 2001, p.201-246.
LATOUR, Bruno. We have never been modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993.
LATOUR, Bruno. CALLON, Michel. Unscrewing the big Leviathan: how actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In: KNORR-CETINA, K. D.; CICOUREL, A.V. (eds.). Advances in social theory and methodology: toward and integration of micro- and macro-Sociologies. Boston: Routledge; Kegan Paul, 1981, p.277-303.
LAW, John. Technology and heterogeneous engineering: the case of portuguese expansion. IN: PINCH, Trevor J. ; BIJKER, Wiebe E.; HUGHES, Thomas P. The social construction of technological systems: new directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge (Mass.), MIT, 1993, p. 105-127.
LYON, Liz. eBank UK: building the links between research data, scholarly communication and learning, Ariadne, Leicestershire, n. 36, 2003. Disponível em: http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue/36/lyon/. Acesso em: 01 maio 2019.
MEDEIROS, Jackson da Silva. Uma investigação sobre a autoria de dados científicos: teias de uma rede em construção. Rev. Digit. Bibliotecon. Cienc. Inf. Campinas, SP, v.14, n. 2, p. 298-317, maio/ago. 2016. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.20396/rdbci.v14i2.8644015. Acesso em: 15 maio 2019.
MICHENER, William K.; JONES, Matthew B. Ecoinformatics: supporting ecology as a data-intensive science. Trends In Ecology & Evolution, [s.l.], v. 27, n. 2, p.85-93, fev. 2012. Elsevier BV. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.11.016. Acesso em: 15 maio 2019.
MOOERS, Calvin N. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, v.7. Marcel Dekker: New York, 1972. p. 31.
NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE. PMC and research funder policies [online]. The Library; 2018. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/about/public-access/. Acesso em: 15 maio 2019.
NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE. PMC policies [online]. The Library. 2018. Disponível em: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/about/guidelines. Acesso em: 15 abr. 2019.
NATIONAL INSTITUTIONS OF HEALTH. NIH Data Sharing Policy and Implementation Guidance. 2003. Disponível em: https://goo.gl/suJsEY. Acesso em: 25 fev. 2019.
NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH. NIH grants policy statement (10/10) - Part II: terms and conditions of NIH grant awards, Subpart A: General – File 6 of 6. 15 out. 2010. Disponível em: https://goo.gl/q2ECLY. Acesso em: 25 fev. 2019.
NATIONAL SCIENCE BOARD. Long-lived digital data collections: enabling research and education in the 21st century. National Science Foundation, Sept. 2005. Disponível em: http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2005/nsb0540/nsb0540.pdf. Acesso em: 01 set. 2018.
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION. Cyberinfrastructure Vision for 21st Century Discovery. 2007. Disponível em: https://goo.gl/AEFEJ4. Acesso em: 10 abr. 2019.
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION. Dissemination and sharing of research results. 2010. Disponível em: https://goo.gl/E6nsXV. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2019.
OBJECT MANAGEMENT GROUP. Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN). V. 2.0. 2011. Disponível em: https://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/. Acesso em: 5 dez. 2018.
OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY. Memorandum For The Heads Of Executive Departments And Agencies. 6p. 22 fev. 2013. Disponível em: https://goo.gl/Ak8UwV. Acesso em: 10 fev. 2019.
OPEN SCIENCE AND RESEARCH INITIATIVE. The Open Science and Research Handbook. 2014. Disponível em: http://openscience.fi/training. Acesso em: 5 dez. 2018.
ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT. OECD principles and guidelines for access to research data from public funding. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2007. Disponível em: http://www.oecd.org/sti/sci-tech/38500813.pdf. Acesso em: 31 ago. 2018.
ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT. Making Open Science a Reality. (OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, 25). Paris: OECD Publishing. 2015. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jrs2f963zs1-en. Acesso em: 21 out. 2018.
PAVÃO, Caterina Groposo; ROCHA, Rafael Porte da; GABRIEL JUNIOR, Rene Faustino. Proposta de criação de uma rede de dados abertos da pesquisa brasileira. Rev. Digit. Bibliotecon. Cienc. Inf. Campinas, SP, v.16, n. 2, p. 329-343, maio/ago. 2018. Disponível em: DOI 10.20396/rdbci.v16i2.8650424. Acesso em: 15 jun. 2019.
PINHEIRO, Lena Vania Ribeiro. Mutações na ciência da informação e reflexos nas mandalas interdisciplinares, Inf. & Soc.:Est., João Pessoa, v. 28, n. 3, p. 115-134, set./dez. 2018.
PONTIKA, Nancy; KNOTH, Petr; CANCELLIERI, Matteo; PEARCE, Samuel. Fostering open science to research using a Taxonomy and an eLearning Portal. In: iKnow: 15th International Conference on Knowledge Technologies and Data Driven Business, 21 - 22 October 2015, Graz, Austria. 2015. Disponível em: http://oro.open.ac.uk/44719/. Acesso em: 21 abr. 2019.
QUÉBEC. Ministère de L’éducation Nationale de la Recherche et de la Technologie. Les compétences transversales. Programme de formation de l'école québécoise. 2004. Disponível em: https://goo.gl/pU4bxW. Acesso em: 02 jan. 2019.
ORGANIZATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT. Making Open Science a Reality. (OECD Science, Technology and Industry Policy Papers, 25). Paris: OECD Publishing. 2015. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jrs2f963zs1-en. Acesso em: 21 nov. 2018.
RESEARCH DATA CANADA. Research data management in Canadian universities: a statement of principles. 2016. 5p. Disponível em: https://goo.gl/f6cRaR. Acesso em: 12 jan. 2019.
RÜEGG, Janine; GRIES, Corinna; BOND-LAMBERTY, Ben; BOWEN, Gabriel J; FELZER, Benjamin S; MCINTYRE, Nancy E; SORANNO, Patricia A; VANDERBILT, Kristin L; WEATHERS, Kathleen C. Completing the data life cycle: using information management in macrosystems ecology research, Front Ecol Environ, v. 12, n. 1, p. 24–30, 2014. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1890/120375. Acesso em: 20 jan. 2019.
SAYÃO, Luis Fernando; SALES, Luana Farias. Algumas considerações sobre os repositórios digitais de dados de Pesquisa. Inf. Inf., Londrina, v. 21, n. 2, p. 90-115, maio/ago., 2016.
SAYÃO, Luis Fernando; SALES, Luana Farias. O impacto da curadoria digital dos dados de pesquisa na comunicação científica. Encontros Bibli: revista eletrônica de Biblioteconomia e Ciência da Informação, Florianópolis, v. 17, n. esp. 2 – III SBCC, p.118-135, 2012a. DOI:10.5007/1518-2924.2012v17nesp2p118.
SAYÃO, Luis Fernando; SALES, Luana Farias. Curadoria digital: um novo patamar para preservação de dados digitais de pesquisa. Informacao & Sociedade: Estudos, v. 22, n. 3, p. 179-192, 2012b.
SAYÃO, Luis Fernando; SALES, Luana Farias. Ciberinfraestrutura de informação para a pesquisa: uma proposta de arquitetura para integração de repositórios e sistemas CRIS. Brazil, Informacao & Sociedade: Estudos, João Pessoa, v.25, n.3, p. 163-184, set./dez. 2015.
SISMONDO, Sergio. Actor-network theory. In: SISMONDO, Sergio. An introduction to science and technology studies. Wiley Blackwell: West Sussex, UK, 2010, p.81-92.
SOCIAL SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES RESEARCH COUNCIL OF CANADA. Research Data Archiving Policy. 1990. Disponível em: https://goo.gl/Pyk9ZF. Acesso em: 25 fev. 2018.
STRUCTURAL REFORM GROUP. DDI Version 3.0 Conceptual Model. Data Documentation Initiative Alliance. 2014. Disponível em: https://www.ddialliance.org/sites/default/files/Concept-Model-WD.pdf. Acesso em: 22 fev. 2019.
THE ENGINEERING AND PHYSICAL SCIENCES RESEARCH COUNCIL. EPSRC policy framework on research data. 2018. Disponível em: https://goo.gl/8jDswQ. Acesso em: 22 fev. 2019.
THE WELCOME TRUST. Policy on data, software and materials management and sharing. 2017. Disponível em: https://wellcome.ac.uk/node/1912. Acesso em: 25 fev. 2019.
TRI-AGENCY Statement of Principles on Digital Data Management. 2014. 5p. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR). The Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC). The Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC): Alberta, 2014. Disponível em: https://goo.gl/ZuTZ6J. Acesso em: 25 fev. 2019.
UCF LIBRARIES RLC COMMITTE. Research Lifecycle at University of Central Florida. Online. 2012. Disponível em: https://library.ucf.edu/about/departments/scholarly-communication/overview-research-lifecycle/. Acesso em: 01 maio 2019.
RDBCI: Revista Digital de Biblitoeconomia e Ciência da Informação / Digital Journal of Library and Information Science uses the Creative Commons (CC) license, thus preserving the integrity of articles in an open access environment, in which:
- This publication reserves the right to modify the original, regarding norms, spelling and grammar, in order to maintain the standards of the language, still respecting author writing style;
- The original documents will not be returned to the authors;
- Published works become Revista Digital de Biblitoeconomia e Ciência da Informação / Digital Journal of Library and Information Science's property, their second partial or full print being subject to expressed authorization by RDBCI's editor;
- The original source of publicaton must be provided at all times;
- The authors are solely responsible fo the views expressed within the document.
Downloads
