Banner Portal
Bibliometrics and data science
PDF (Português (Brasil))
PDF
ÁUDIO [MPEG] (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Bibliographic searches
Bibliometrics
Network analysis

How to Cite

MORAES, Lena Lúcia de; KAFURE, Ivette. Bibliometrics and data science: an example search and analysis of scientific information from the Web of Science (WoS). RDBCI: Digital Journal of Library and Information Science, Campinas, SP, v. 18, n. 00, p. e020016, 2020. DOI: 10.20396/rdbci.v19i0.8658521. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8658521. Acesso em: 17 jul. 2024.

Abstract

This practical study shows how an academic can use the techniques and tools of Bibliometry, Data Science, Network Science and Big Data to carry out a bibliographic survey of research. From the problem situation of a student who needs to do a bibliographic survey of the subjects: study of users and emotions involved in episodes of interaction with information systems, the study is developed. It seeks to answer questions such as: (i) what are the keywords that most occur and how are they related? (ii) who are the most cited authors in the study area? (iii) what are the references shared by the authors of the documents? (iv) what are the main sources of the documents? Based on the subjects, the initial bibliographic survey and consultation on Google Books Ngram Viewer, a set of terms used in the search tools was determined: “information science”, “user study”, “user experience”, “user emotion” and "User affect". These terms were used to consult scientific: Web Of Science (WoS), Scopus, PubMed and SciELO. Through the empirical analysis of 2,198 documents retrieved from WoS in the VOSviewer tool, the words network (in English) and the co-citation networks of authors, references and sources were constructed and examined. The results of the analysis of the networks facilitate the combination of elements for understanding information and knowledge of the studied area. It provides an overview of the area, as well as the exploration of specific contexts. Finally, it facilitates and directs the delimitation of research, minimizing information anxiety.

https://doi.org/10.20396/rdbci.v19i0.8658521
PDF (Português (Brasil))
PDF
ÁUDIO [MPEG] (Português (Brasil))

References

ALVARADO, Rubén Urbizagástegui. A bibliometria: história, legitimação e estrutura. In: TOUTAIN, Lídia Maria Batista Brandão (org.). Para entender a ciência da informação. Salvador: EDUFBA, 2007. pp. 185-217.

ARAÚJO, Carlos Alberto Ávila. O que é Ciência da Informação. Belo Horizonte: KMA, 2018.

BARABÁSI, Albert-László. Network science. Northeastern University, Boston. 2016. ISBN: 9781107076266. Disponível em: http://networksciencebook.com. Acesso em: 05 maio 2018.

BORKO, Harold. Information Science: what it is? American Documentation. 1968. p. 3-5.

BRAGA, Ryon. O excesso de informação - a neurose do século XXI. Revista Aprender Virtual - O mundo da educação, v. 23, 2016. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2Z43Koz. Acesso em: 27 fev. 2018.

CUNHA, Murilo Bastos da; AMARAL, Sueli Angelica do Amaral; DANTAS, Edmundo Brandão. Manual de estudo de usuários da informação. São Paulo: Atlas, 2015. 448 p.

DIODATO, Virgil Pasquale. Dictionary of bibliometrics. New York: Haworth Press, 1994. ISBN: 1-56024-852-1.

GLÄNZEL, Wolfgang. Bibliometrics as a research field: a course on theory and application of bibliometric indicators. 2003. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/37SFkCN. Acesso em: 5 maio 2018.

GOOGLE, 2013. Google Books Ngram Viewer. In: Google Inc. Google, 2013. Disponível em: https://books.google.com/ngrams/info. Acesso em: 5 maio 2018.

HASSENZAHL, Marc: User experience (ux): towards an experiential perspective on product quality. In: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 20TH CONFERENCE ON L’INTERACTION HOMME-MACHINE, IHM’, 8., p.11–15. Proceedings of… New York, NY: ACM, 2008., ISBN 978-1-60558-285-6. Disponível em: http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1512714.1512717. Acesso em: 5 maio 2018.

HJØRLAND, Birger. Domain analysis in information science: eleven approaches-traditional as well as innovative. Journal of Documentation, v. 58, n. 4, p. 422-462, 2002.

LABORATÓRIO DE POLÍTICAS PÚBLICAS PARTICIPATIVAS (L3P) – 100 Ferramentas para Análise de Redes Sociais. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/2B4IreF. Acesso em: 5 maio 2018.

MILLER, Holmes. E. Big-data in cloud computing: a taxonomy of risks. Information Research, v.18, n. 1, 2013. Disponível em: http://www.informationr.net/ir/18-1/paper571.html#.WwiM2KQvzcc.

NETMARKETSHARE. Desktop search engine market share. 2018. Market Share Statistics for Internet Technologies.https://www.netmarketshare.com. Acesso em: 15 fev. 2018.

NORMAN, Donald: Emotional design: why we love (or hate) everyday things. Basic Books, 2004, ISBN 9780465051359. Disponível em: https://books.google.com.br/books?id=z2jvRlqhdlwC. Acesso em: 5 maio 2018.

NORTON, Melanie J. Introductory concepts in Information Science. ASIS Monograph Series, 2008. ISBN 0-573-87087-0.

NRC, National Research Council. Network Science. Committee on Network Science for Future Army Applications. 2005. Disponível em: https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11516/network-science. Acesso em: 5 maio 2018.

RUAS, Terry Lima e PEREIRA, Luciana. Como construir indicadores de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação usando Web of Science, Derwent World Patent Index, Bibexcel e Pajek? Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação. v.19. n.3. p.52-81. jul/set. 2014. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/3ewN0wU. Acesso em: 5 maio 2018.

SAMPAIO, Ricardo Barros. As estruturas globais e regionais do campo de pesquisa, desenvolvimento e inovação das doenças negligenciadas leishmaniose e tuberculose sob a ótica das redes complexas. 2015. Tese (Doutorado em Ciência da Informação) - Faculdade de Ciência da Informação - Universidade de Brasília, 2015. Disponível em: http://repositorio.unb.br/handle/10482/19126. Acesso em: 28 maio 2018.

VAN ECK, Nees Jan; WALTMAN, Ludo. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. 2010. Scientometrics, n.84, 523–538.

VAN ECK, Nees Jan; WALTMAN, Ludo. Text mining and visualization using VOSviewer. CoRR, v. 84, n. 2, p. 523–538, 2011. Disponível em: http://arxiv.org/abs/1109.2058. Acesso em: 5 maio 2018.

VAN ECK, Nees Jan; WALTMAN, Ludo. Visualizing bibliometric networks. In: DING, Y.; ROUSSEAU, R.; WOLFRAM, D. (ed.). Measuring scholarly impact: methods and practice. Springer, 2014. p. 285–320.

WURMAN, Richard Saul. Ansiedade de Informação 2. São Paulo, Editora Cultura, 2001.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2020 Lena Lúcia de Moraes, Ivette Kafure

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.