Banner Portal
Transdisciplinarity
Transdiciplinar
VÍDEO (Português (Brasil))
PDF (Português (Brasil))
PDF
ÁUDIO (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Knowledge unity
Transdisciplinarity
Scientific and technological knowledge

How to Cite

ALVARES, Lillian Maria Araújo de Rezende; FREIRE, Patricia de Sá. Transdisciplinarity: the search for the unit of scientific and technological knowledge. RDBCI: Digital Journal of Library and Information Science, Campinas, SP, v. 20, n. 00, p. e022016, 2022. DOI: 10.20396/rdbci.v20i00.8670175. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/rdbci/article/view/8670175. Acesso em: 17 jul. 2024.

Abstract

Introduction: Reflections on the unity of knowledge have taken place at various times in history. Modern science, however, brings in its wake the issue of disciplinary specialization, which caused a profound change in the search for scientific knowledge. The new disciplinary order, increasingly specialized, hindered the integrated vision of science and knowledge, leading to a distancing from the various realities contained in the same problem or circumstance, and even disregarding the necessary integration between knowledges. Objectives: To understand the relevance of searching for all aspects of the same situation, this research aims to deepen the contributions and understandings of some of the first thinkers who dealt with the unity of knowledge, extending to Kurt Gödel, considered as the father of transdisciplinarity, and to Mode 2 of knowledge production by Michael Gibbons. Method: This study consists of an interpretativist, qualitative research, resulting in a critical literature review, which synthesized the information through evaluation and in-depth discussion about the unity of scientific and technological knowledge. Results: Unity of knowledge refers to the fact that conditioned knowledge can only achieve its integrity through unconditioned knowledge, the latter not merely a contingent aggregate, but an indispensable system for the complete identity of conditioned knowledge.   Conclusion: Transdisciplinarity, in this aspect, is the search for the unity of knowledge, beyond disciplinary boundaries, in order to capture all the complexity of the multidimensional and the multi-referential Reality of the conditioned element.

https://doi.org/10.20396/rdbci.v20i00.8670175
VÍDEO (Português (Brasil))
PDF (Português (Brasil))
PDF
ÁUDIO (Português (Brasil))

References

ALVARES, L. M. A. de R.; FREIRE, P. de S. Frameworks for scientific and technological research oriented by transdisciplinary co-production. London: Anthem Press, 2022. ISBN 9781839986840.

ARIEW, R. Descartes and the tree of knowledge. Synthese, New York, v. 92, n. 1, p. 101-11, 1992. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20117041. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2022.

ARISTOTLE. Metaphysics. London: Harvard University Press, 1989.

ATTEN, M. van. A note on Leibniz’s argument against infinite wholes. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, London, v. 19, n. 1, p. 121-129, 2017. Disponível em: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00775348/document. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2022.

BULLYNCK, M. Johann Lambert’s scientific tool kit. Science in Context, Cambridge, v.23. n. 1, p.65-89, 2010. Disponível em: https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00663305/document. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2022.

BURKHARDT, H.;DEGEN, Wo. Mereology in Leibniz’s logic and philosophy. Topoi, Ontário, v.9, n.1, p.3-13, 1990. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00147625. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2022.

CARDOSO, A. O universo monadológico: natureza, vida e expressão. In: LEIBNIZ, Gottfried Wilhelm. Monadologia. Lisboa: Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT), 2016. Disponível em: https://research.unl.pt/ws/portalfiles/portal/2415323/Monadologia_FINAL.pdf. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2022.

CORNWALL, A. JEWKES, R. What is participatory research? Social Science & Medicine, Amsterdam , v.41, n.12, p.1667-1676, 1995. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.2167/md073. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2022.

DESCARTES, R. Regula ad directionem ingenii (Rules for the direction of the natural intelligence): a bilingual edition of the cartesian treatise on method. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1998.

DESCARTES, R.; MACLEAN, I. A discourse on the method of correctly conducting one’s reason and seeking truth in the sciences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006. (Oxford world’s classics.)

GHASSIB, H. A theory of the knowledge industry. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, London, v.26, n.4, p.447-456, 2012. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1080/02698595.2012.748499. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2022.

GIBBONS, M. et al.The new production of knowledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage, 1994. Disponível em: https://sk.sagepub.com/books/the-new-production-of-knowledge. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2022.

HADORN, G. H. et al. Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Berlim: Springer, 2008. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/3cQyp3w. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2022.

HIRATA, C. Sistema em Leibniz e Descartes. Trans/Form/Ação, Marília, v.35. n.1, p.23-36, 2012. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1590/S0101-31732012000100003. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2022.

JANTSCH, E. Vers l’interdisciplinarité et la transdisciplinarité dans l’enseignement et l’innovation. In: L’INTERDISCIPLINARITÉ: PROBLÈMES D’ENSEIGNEMENT ET DE RECHERCHE DANS LES UNIVERSITÉS, 1, 1970. Nice. Annales […]. Paris: Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques; Centre pour la Recherche et l’Innovation dans l’Enseignement, 1972.

KLEIN, J. The transdisciplinary moment(um). Integration Review, Bethel (Ohio), v.9, n.2, p.189-199, 2013. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/3zHpFpp. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2022.

KLEIN, J. Unity of knowledge and transdisciplinarity: contexts of definition, theory and the new discourse of problem solving. In: UNITY of knowledge (in transdisciplinary research for sustainability). Paris: UNESCO (EOLSS Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems Publications), 2009. (Vol. I). Disponível em: http://www.eolss.net/sample-chapters/c04/e6-49-01.pdf. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2022.

KOCKELMANS, J. Why interdisciplinarity? In: KOCKELMANS, J. (ed.). Interdisciplinarity and higher education. Pennsylvania: Penn State Press, 1979. Disponível em: https://www.psupress.org/books/titles/0-271-02326-0.html. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2022.

LAKATOS, E. M.; MARCONI, M. de A Metodologia científica. 2. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 1991.

LEIBNIZ, G. W. New essays on human understanding. [S.l, s.n.], 2015.

LICHNEROWICZ, A. Mathématiques et transdisciplinarité. Études Renaniennes, Colloque D, Paris, n. 43, p.22-32, 1980. Disponível em: https://www.persee.fr/doc/renan_0046-2659_1980_num_43_1_1233. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2022.

LUCA, F. de. A relação entre cibernética e metafisica e suas consequências na vida social a partir da monadologia de G. W. Leibniz. Cadernos Espinosanos, Estudos Sobre o Século XVII, São Paulo, n. 34, 2016. (Número Especial Sobre Leibniz). Disponível em: https://www.revistas.usp.br/espinosanos/article/view/117009. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2022.

MARTIN, S. G. History of philosophy. Monist, Oxford, v.36, n.4, p.678-699, 1926. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.5840/monist192636435. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2022.

MATTHEWS, M. (Ed.). The scientific background to modern philosophy: selected readings. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing, 1989.

NICOLESCU, B. Godelian aspects of nature and knowledge. In: ALTMANN, G.; KOCH, W. A. (ed.). Systems: new paradigms for the human sciences. Paris: Universite Pierre et Marie Curie. Division de Physique Theorique, 1996a. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110801194.385. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2022.

NICOLESCU, B.. Transdisciplinarity: past, present and future. In: HAVERKORT, B.; REIJNTJES, C. (ed.). Moving worldviews: reshaping sciences, policies and practices for endogenous sustainable development. Holanda: Compas Editions, 2006. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/3oFT1y8. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2022.

NICOLESCU, B. La transdisciplinarité: manifeste. 1a. ed. Monaco: Éditions du Rocher, 1996b. Disponível em: https://bit.ly/3Q3liKt. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2022.

NOWOTNY, H.; SCOTT, P.; GIBBONS, M. From reliable knowledge to socially robust knowledge. In: NOWOTNY, H.; SCOTT, P.; GIBBONS, M. (ed.). Re-thinking science: knowledge and the public in an age of uncertainty. 1a ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.

PIAGET, J. L’épistémologie des relations interdisciplinaires. In: L’INTERDISCIPLINARITÉ: PROBLÈMES D’ENSEIGNEMENT ET DE RECHERCHE DANS LES UNIVERSITÉS, 1, 1970. Nice. Annales […]. Paris: Organisation de Coopération et de Développement Économiques; Centre pour la Recherche et l’Innovation dans l’Enseignement, 1972.

POHL, C.; RIST, S.; ZIMMERMANN, A.; FRY, P.; et al Researchers’ roles in knowledge co-production: experience from sustainability research in Kenya, Switzerland, Bolivia and Nepal. Science and Public Policy, Oxford, v.37, n.4, p.267-281, 2010. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.3152/030234210X496628. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2022.

POLK, M. Institutional capacity-building in urban planning and policy-making for sustainable development: success or failure? Planning, Practice & Research, London, v.26, n.2, p. 185-206, 2011. Disponível em: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02697459.2011.560461?cookieSet=1 Acesso em: 17 jun. 2022.

SONNENWALD, D. Scientific collaboration. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, Hoboken (New Jersey), v.41, p. 643-681, 2007. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1002/aris.2007.1440410121. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2022.

VARZI, A. Mereology. Stanford: Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2016. Disponível em: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/mereology/. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2022.

WRAY, K. B. The epistemic significance of collaborative research. Philosophy of Science, New York, v.69, n.1, p.150-168, 2002. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/338946. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2022.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2022 Lillian M. A. de R. Alvares, Patricia de Sá Freire

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.