ASSESSMENT FORM - RDBCI
This form allows the referee to evaluate the submitted work online.
1. Manuscript title*
2. Type of text* 2.
Original Article
Experience report
Research
Book Review
3. Is the work original and relevant to the field?*
Yes
Not original
4. Formal structure of the paper - Adequacy of the publication norms [Template]*
Yes
No
Make adjustments
5. Is the title expressive and consistent with the wording of the text? *
Yes
No
Make adjustments
6. Is the work adequate to the references and citations of the ABNT norms?*
Yes
The norms are not in ABNT format
Carry out adjustments
7. The manuscript presents adequacy and quality of tables, graphs and illustrations?*
Yes
There are no tables, graphs and illustrations
Make adjustments
8. The abstract is adequate and in accordance with the standards of the journal?*
Yes
Not in accordance
Make adjustments
9. Is there clarity in the presentation of the argument and/or central objective of the text?*
Yes
No
Partially
10. The theory(s), references, eventual analysis, and arguments are articulated in a coherent and well-structured manner?*
Yes
Not at all
Partially
11. The analyses are theoretically and methodologically consistent?*
Yes
No
Partially
12. The bibliography is up-to-date and pertinent to the topic being addressed?*
Yes
No
Partially
13. Considering the items above, the article can be evaluated as:* Very good
Very good
Good
Fair
Weak
14 The manuscript should be:*
15. If the manuscript has restrictions, please state here what they were:
16. Comments on the manuscript. In case the manuscript is refused, record the reasons.
17. Final opinion (Justification)*.
18. In compliance with Open Science, we ask the reviewers if they agree with the publication of the manuscript's approval evaluation reports, according to the following options:*
Yes, I agree to open the review with my identification.
Yes, I agree to open the review without my identification.
I do not agree to open the review.
Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)