Abstract
Nos últimos anos, educadores, a mídia, políticos, oficiais da lei, publicitários, capitalistas de risco, acadêmicos, crianças, adolescentes e pais – um amplo segmento da sociedade americana no geral – voltaram sua atenção para um site conhecido como MySpace1 . Em relação aos adolescentes, muito do debate público tem se preocupado com questões relativas à privacidade e segurança. Contudo, neste artigo, meu interesse concentrase na produção e uso dos perfis MySpace por parte dos adolescentes na comunicação cotidiana.
ABSTRACT:
Over the past several years, educators, the media, policy makers, law enforcement officials, advertisers, venture capitalists, academics, kids, teenagers, and parents–a large segment of American society as a whole–have all turned their attention to a website called MySpace2 . With respect to teenagers, much of the public debate has been concerned with issues of privacy and safety. However, in this paper my interest is in teenagers’ production and use of their MySpace profiles as a part of their everyday communication.
Keywords: copy and paste literacy; literacy; MySpace profile
References
BAKHTIN, M. M. (1986). The problem of speech genres. In Speech genres and other late essays, ed. C.
Emerson, M. Holquist, and V. W. McGee, 60-102. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
boyd, d. (2006a). Identity production in a networked culture: Why Youth ? MySpace. Presentation given at the Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, February 19, 2006, in San Francisco, CA. http://www.danah.org/papers/AAAS2006.html (retrieved June 12, 2006) _______. (2006b). Friends, friendsters, and Top 8: Writing community into being on social network sites. First Monday 11(12), http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_12/boyd/index.html12/5/2006 (retrieved December 2006).
BUCKINGHAM, D. (2000). After the death of childhood. Oxford: Polity Press.
_______. (2007). Media education goes digital: An introduction. Learning, Media, and Technology 32(2): 111-119.
CARR, D. (2007). User customization: Too much of a good thing? Baseline January 16. http:// www.baselinemag.com/print_article2/0,1217,a=198615,00.asp (retrieved January 27, 2007).
CHANDLER, D, and D. ROBERTS-YOUNG. (1998). The construction of identity in the personal homepages of adolescents,http://www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/short/strasbourg.html (retrieved September 12, 2006).
DE CERTEAU, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley, CA: UC Berkeley Press.
DISESSA, A. A. (2000). Changing minds: Computers, learning, and literacy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
DISESSA, A. A. In press. Can students re-invent fundamental scientific principles? Evaluating the promise of new-media literacies. In Children’s learning in a digital world, ed. T. Willoughby and E. Wood.
Oxford: Blackwell.
DYSON, A. H. (2002). The drinking god factor: A writing development remix for “all” children. Written Communication 19: 545-577.
ERSTAD, O., Ø. GILJE, and T. de LANGE. (2007). Re-mixing multimodal resources: Multiliteracies and digital production in Norwegian media education. Learning, Media, and Technology 32 (2): 183- 198.
FACER, K., J. FURLONG, R. FURLONG, and R. SUTHERLAND. (2003). ScreenPlay: Children and computing in the home. London: Routledge Farmer.
FINNEGAN, R. (2002). Communicating: The multiple modes of human interconnections. London: Routledge.
FOST, D. (2006). Key web 2.0 sites. San Fransisco Chronicle, November 5.
GARNETT, J. (2006). MySpace: Design anarchy that works. Business Week Online, January 3, http://www.businessweek.com/innovate/content/dec2005/id20051230_570094.htm (retrieved January 4, 2006).
GEE, J. P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. London: Taylor and Francis.
_______. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
GOODY, J. (1977). The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
GOODY, J., and I. WATT. (1968). The consequences of literacy. In Literacy in traditional societies, ed.
J. Goody, 27-68. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
HINE, C. (2000). Virtual ethnography. London: Sage.
HOBBS, R. (2004). A review of school-based initiatives in media literacy education. American Behavioral Scientist 48(1): 42-59.
HULL, G., and M. E. NELSON. (2005). Locating the semiotic power of mulimodality. Written Communication 22(2): 1-38.
ITO, M. (2008). Mobilizing the imagination in everyday play: The case of Japanese media mixes. In The international handbook of children, media, and culture, ed. K. Drotner and S. Livingstone, 385- 406. London: Sage.
JENKINS, H. (1992). Textual poachers: Television fans and participatory culture. London: Routledge.
_______. (2006). Learning by Remixing, http://www.pbs.org/mediashift/2006/07/ learning_by_remixing.html (retrieved July 20, 2006).
JENKINS, H., K. CLINTON, R. PURUSHOTMA, A. J. ROBINSON, and M. WEIGEL. (2006). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. An Occasional Paper written for the MacArthur Foundation. http://www.digitallearning.macfound.org/site/c.enJLKQNlFiG/ b.2029291/k.97E5/Occasional_Papers.htm (retrieved October 20, 2006).
KINDER, M. (1991). Playing with power. Berkeley, CA: UC Berkeley Press.
KRESS, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
KRESS, G. and C. JEWITT. (2003). Introduction. In Multimodal literacy, ed. C. Jewitt and G. Kress, 1-18.
Bonn: Peter Lang.
LAVE, J., and E. WENGER. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
LENHART, A., and M. MADDEN. (2005). Teen content creators and consumers: Findings of the Pew Internet and American Life Project. http://www.pewinternet.org/PPF/r/166/report_display.asp (retrieved November 2, 2005).
LIVINGSTONE, S. (2002). Young people and new media: Childhood and the changing media environment. London: Sage.
_______. (2004). Media literacy and the challenge of new information and communication technologies.
The Communication Review 7: 3-14.
LYMAN, P., and N. WAKEFORD. (1999). Introduction: Going into the (virtual) field. American Behavioral Scientist 43: 359-376.
MANOVICH, L. (2003). Introduction to the Korean edition of The Language of New Media. http:// www.manovich.net/DOCS/Introduction_Korea_2003.doc (retrieved July 25, 2006).
_______. (2005). Remixability and Modularity, http://www.manovich.net (retrieved July 25, 2006).
MARWICK, A. (2005). “I’m a lot more interesting than a Friendster profile:” Identity presentation, authenticity and power in social networking services. Paper presented at conference of the Association of Internet Researchers 6.0: Internet Generations, October 5-9, in Chicago, IL.
MySpace. (2006). FAQ, http://collect.myspace.com/misc/faq.cfm?question=1 (retrieved March 24, 2006).
OLSEN, S. (2006). MySpace blurs lines between friends and flacks. CNET’s News.com, July. http:// news.com.com/MySpace+blurs+line+between+friends+and+flacks/2009-1025_3-6100176.html (retrieved August 1, 2006).
OLSON, D. R. (1977). From utterance to text: The bias of language in speech and writing. Harvard Educational Review 47(3): 257-81.
ONG, W. (1982). Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. New York, NY: Routledge.
SCRIBNER, S. and M. COLE. (1981). The psychology of literacy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
SEFTON-GREEN, J. (2005). Timelines, timeframes, and special effects: Software and creative media production. Education, Communication and Information 5(1).
STREET, B. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
_______. (1995). Social literacies. London: Longman.
WILLIS, P. (1990). Common culture: Symbolic work at play in the everyday cultures of the young.
Boulder: Westview Press.
O periódico Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada utiliza a licença do Creative Commons (CC), preservando assim, a integridade dos artigos em ambiente de acesso aberto, em que:
- A publicação se reserva o direito de efetuar, nos originais, alterações de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical, com vistas a manter o padrão culto da língua, respeitando, porém, o estilo dos autores;
- Os originais não serão devolvidos aos autores;
- Os autores mantêm os direitos totais sobre seus trabalhos publicados na Trabalhos de Linguística Aplicada, ficando sua reimpressão total ou parcial, depósito ou republicação sujeita à indicação de primeira publicação na revista, por meio da licença CC-BY;
- Deve ser consignada a fonte de publicação original;
- As opiniões emitidas pelos autores dos artigos são de sua exclusiva responsabilidade.