Para além da disciplinaridade e da dicotomia de gênero? A contribuição da praxeologia de Pierre Bourdieu para estudos de gênero em arquitetura e urbanismo

  • Karla Caser Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo
Palavras-chave: Praxeologia. Bourdieu. Gênero. Interdisciplinaridade. Arquitetura.

Resumo

Este artigo faz parte de pesquisa iniciada em 2013 na Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, sobre Relações de Gênero em Arquitetura e Urbanismo no Brasil. O objetivo deste artigo é apresentar revisão da literatura internacional sobre o tema e introduzir as contribuições do sociólogo francês Pierre Bourdieu aos estudos de gênero e arquitetura. Primeiramente é apresentado um panorama das publicações em arquitetura e gênero na literatura internacional, onde são apresentadas as diferentes linhas/abordagens do assunto. Em seguida, é brevemente apresentada a busca pela interdisciplinaridade em arquitetura a partir da década de 60. Na última parte são apresentadas os principais conceitos da praxeologia de Pierre Bourdieu e os seus rebatimentos em pesquisas na área de arquitetura.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Karla Caser, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo

Arquiteta formada na Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Mestre em Tecnologia do Ambiente Construído pela Escola de Engenharia de São Carlos – EESC/USP e Ph.D. pela University of Guelph, Canada. Professora da Graduação e Pós-graduação em Arquitetura e Urbanismo, com pesquisas relacionadas a espaços públicos urbanos e estudos de gênero em arquitetura.

Referências

AGREST, Diane (1991). Architecture from without: theoretical framings for a new practice. Cambridge, Mass.: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

AGREST, Diane; CONWAY, Patricia; WEISMAN, Leslie (eds) (1996). The sex of architecture. New York: Harry Abrams.

AHRENTZEN, S. (1996). The F-word in architecture: feminist analysis in/of/for architecture. In: DUTTON, T.; MANN, L. (eds). Reconstructing her practice: critical discourses and social practices. London: University of Minessota Press, p.71-118.

AHRENTZEN, S. (2003). The Space between the Studs: Feminism and Architecture. Signs, vol. 29, n. 1, p. 179-206.

BRIDGE, G. 2001. “Bourdieu, Rational Action and the Time-space Strategy of Gentrification”. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 26, p.205-216.

BOURDIEU, Pierre. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

BOURDIEU, Pierre. (1979). Algeria 1960. Cambridge, Mass.: Cambridge University Press.

BOURDIEU, Pierre. (1983). “The Field of Cultural Production, or the Economic World Reversed”. Poetics, v12, 311-356.

BOURDIEU, Pierre. (1984). Distinction: a social critique of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

BOURDIEU, Pierre. (1985). “The Social Space and the Genesis of Groups”. Theory and Society, v. 14, n. 06, p. 723-744.

BOURDIEU, Pierre. (1986). ´The Forms of Capital´. In: RICHARDSON (ed). Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press, p. 141-158.

BOURDIEU, Pierre. (1987). “What Makes a Social Class? On the Theoretical and Practical Existence of Groups”. Berkeley Journal of Sociology: A Critical Review, vol. 32, p. 1-18.

BOURDIEU, Pierre. (1989). “Social Space and Symbolic Power”. Sociological Theory, vol. 7, no. 1, (Spring 1989), p. 14-25.

BOURDIEU, Pierre. (1990). The Logic of Practice. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

BOURDIEU, Pierre. (1991). Language and symbolic Power. Cambridge: Polity Press.

BOURDIEU, Pierre. (1998). “Social Space and Symbolic Power”. Sociological Theory, vol. 7, n. 1, p. 14-25.

BOURDIEU, Pierre. (1999a). ´Site Effects´. In: BOURDIEU et al. The Weight of the World. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, p. 123-129.

BOURDIEU, Pierre. (2000). Pascalian Meditations. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press

BOURDIEU, Pierre. (2002). “Habitus”. In: HILLIER; ROOKSBY (eds). Habitus: a Sense of Place. Aldershot: Ashgate. p. 27-34.

BOURDIEU, Pierre. (2014 [2002]). A Dominação Masculina. Rio de Janeiro: Bestbolso.

BOURDIEU, P.; WACQUANT, L. (1992). An Invitation to a Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

BOURDIEU, P. et al. (1999). The Weight of the World: Social Suffering in Contemporary Society. Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.

BROWN, Lorri (ed) (2011). Feminist Practices. Londres: Ashgate.

BURNS, Karen (2012). Women in architecture. Disponível em: http://www.archiparlour.org/women-and-architecture/. Acesso em: 15 out. 2013.

CASER, K. (2004). Physical-Social Capital: Towards a Critical Design Praxis for Communities of Place. Guelph: University of Guelph, 362 p. Tese de Doutorado. University of Guelph, Guelph, Canadá.

CASER, K. (2006). ‘The design of the built environment and social capital: Case study of a coastal town facing rapid changes’. In: MAIDA, C. (ed). Sustainability and Communities of Place. New York: Berghahn Books, p. 201-220.

CASER, K. (2012). Place and Social Capital: Methodology for Analysis of Inclusion and Exclusion Objectified in Public Open Spaces. In: INTERNATIONAL URBAN DESIGN CONFERENCE, 2012, Nottingham, UK. Anais… International Urban Design Conference - Designing Place. Nottingham, UK.

CHAMBERLAIN, Jennifer (2010). The cultural reproduction of architecture: examining the roles of cultural capital and organization habitus in the socialization of architectural education. Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia) – University of Michigan, An Arbor.

COLEMAN, D.; DANZE, E.; HENDERSON, C. (eds) (1996). Architecture and feminism. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton Architectural Press.

COLOMINA, Beatriz (ed) (1992). Sexuality and space. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton Architectural Press.

CORROTO, C. (1996). Constructioning Architects: A Critical Ethnography. Columbus, Ohio: Ohio State University, 191 p. Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia) – Programa de Pós-Graduação do Departamento de Sociologia, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.

DOVEY, K. (1999). Framing Places: Mediating Power in Built Form. London: Routledge.

DOVEY, K. (2002). ´The Silent Complicity of Architecture´. In: HILLIER; ROOSKBY (eds). Habitus: a Sense of Place. Burlington, USA: Ashgate, p. 267-280.

DUNCAN, J. and Ley, D. (eds) (1993). Place/Culture/Representation. London and New York: Routledge.

DUNCAN, J. e LAMBERT, D. 2002. “Landscape, Aesthetics, and Power” in Agnew and Smith (eds). American Space/American Place: Geographies of the Contemporary United States. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. pp.264-291.

DURAND, José Carlos (2009). Arte, Privilégio e Distinção: artes plásticas, arquitetura e classe dirigente no Brasil 1855/1985. São Paulo: Perspectiva.

EVERETT, Jeffrey (2002). ´Organizational Research and the Praxeology of Pierre Bourdieu´. Organizational Research Methods, vol. 5, n. 1, p. 56-80.

FLORA, J. 1998. “Social Capital and Communities of Place”. Rural Sociology 63(4), pp. 481-506.

FOWLER, Bridget; WILSON, Fiona (2004). Women Architects and Their Discontents. Sociology, vol.38, n. 1, p. 101–119.

FRANK, Karen (2000). A feminist approach to architecture acknowledging women´s way of knowing. In: Rendell et al (eds). Gender Space Architecture: Londres: Routledge. p.295-305.

GHIRADO, D. (1996). “Where Are the Women in Architectural Studies?” In Ruedi et al (eds) Desiring Practices: Architecture, Gender and the Interdisciplinary. London: Black Dog.1996, 156–73.

GIERYN, T. (2002). What Buildings Do. Theory and Society, vol. 31, p. 35-74.

HAYDEN, Dolores. (1982). The grand domestic revolution. Cambridge: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

HAYDEN, Dolores. (1986). Redesigning the american dream: the future of housing, work, and family life. New York: W.W. Norton.

HAYDEN, Dolores; WRIGHT, Gwendolyn (1976). Architecture and Urban Planning. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, vol. 1, n. 4, p. 923–33.

HILLIER, J.; Rooksby, E. (2002). “Introduction”. In: HILLIER; ROOKSBY (eds). Habitus: a Sense of Place. Aldershot: Ashgate, p. 3-26.

INGOLD, T. 2000. The Perception of the Environment: Essays in Livelihood, Dwelling and Skill. New York: Routledge.

JACOBS, Jane. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Random House.

LEFEBVRE, Henri. The production of space. Oxford: Blackwell. 1991[1971].

LEY, David. (1989). “Modernism, Post-modernism and the Struggle for Place”. In: Agnew and Duncan (eds) The Power of Place. Boston: Unwin Hyman.

MASSEY, Doreen (2009 [1994]). Space, place and gender. Minneapolis: University of Minsesota Press (6a impressão).

MCLEOD, Mary. (1996). “Other” spaces and “Others”. In: Agrest et al The sex of architecture. New York: Harry Abrams. p.15-28.

MCNAY, Lois (1999). Gender, Habitus and the Filed. Theory, Culture and Society, vol. 16, n. 1, p. 95-117.

NESBITT, Kate (2008). Uma nova agenda para a arquitetura: antologia teórica (1965-1995). 2ª ed. São Paulo: Cosac Naify.

PACKWOOD, N. (2003). At the wall of darkness: Pierre Bourdieu. Space & Culture, vol. 6, n. 1, p. 5-8.

PÉREZ-GÓMEZ, A. 1983. Architecture and the Crisis of Modern Science. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

PELLOW, D. 1992. “Spaces that Teach: Attachment to the African Compound” in Altman and Low (eds). Place Attachment. NY and London: Plenum Press. pp. 187- 210.

PODMORE, J. (1998). “(Re) Reading the ‘Loft Living’ Habitus in Montréal’s Inner City”. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, v. 22, n. 2, p. 283-305.

RENDELL, Jane; PENNER, B.; BONDER, I. (eds) (2000). Gender Space Architecture: An interdisciplinary introduction. Londres: Routledge.

ROTHSCHILD, J; ROSNER, V. (1999). Feminisms and design: review essay. In: Rothschild, Joan (ed). Design and Feminism. Londres: Rutgers University Press. p.

ROTHSCHILD, Joan (ed) (1999). Design and Feminism: revisioning spaces, places and everyday things. Londres: Rutgers University Press.

RUBINO, S.(2003). Uma arquiteta, duas capitais, dois projetos de museu: o MASP e o Solar do Unhão. In: SEMINÁRIO DOCOMOMO BRASIL 5, 2003, São Carlos, SP. Anais do 5º Seminário Docomomo Brasil. São Carlos: SAP/EESC/USP.

RUBINO, S.(2010a). Carmen Portinho e sua capital para a vida moderna. Revista da Biblioteca Mário de Andrade, vol. 65, p. 73-92.

RUBINO, Silvana (2010b). Corpos, cadeiras, colares: Charlotte Perriand e Lina Bo Bardi. Cadernos Pagu, vol. 34, p. 331-362.

SÁ, Flávia C. (2010). Profissão Arquiteta: Formação profissional, mercado de trabalho e projeto arquitetônico nas perspectivas das relações de gênero. Dissertação (Mestrado em Arquitetura e Urbanismo) - Faculdade de Arquitetura e Urbanismo, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.

SANDERCROCK, L. (2002). “Difference, Fear and Habitus: a Political Economy of Urban Fears”. In: HILLIER; ROOKSBY (eds). Habitus: a Sense of Place. Aldershot: Ashgate, p. 203-218.

SCOTT-BROWN, Denise (1989). Room at the Top? Sexism and the Star System in Architecture. In: BERKELEY. (ed.); MCQUAID (assoc. ed.), p. 237–246.

STEVENS, Garry (1998). The favored circle: the social foundations of architectural distinction. Cambridge, MA: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.

STREATFIELD, D. Gender and History of Landscape Architecture. In: Mozingo e Jewell, Linda (Eds). Women in Landscape Architecture: Essays on History and Practice. North Carolina: McFarland. 2012. p. 5-31.

SWARTZ, D. (1997). Culture and Power: The Sociology of Pierre Bourdieu. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

SWARTZ, D. (2002). ´The Sociology of Habit: The Perspective of Pierre Bourdieu´. OTJR, vol. 22, p. 61S- 69S.

TORRE, S. (ed) (1977). Women in American Architecture. New York: Watson-Guptill Publications.

WACQUANT, L. 1992. “Toward a Social Praxeology: The Structure and Logic of Bourdieu’s Sociology” in Bourdieu and Wacquant. An Invitation to a Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. pp. 1-59.

WARD, Anthony (1996). The supression of the social in design. In: Dutton, T.; Mann, L. (eds). Reconstructing her practice: critical discourses and social practices. London: University of Minessota Press, p. 27-70.

WEISMAN, Leslie K.(1996). Diversity by design: feminist reflections on the future of architectural education and practice. In: Agrest et al The sex of architecture. New York: Harry Abrams. p. 273-286.

WEISMAN, Leslie K.(1999).Re-designing architectural education: new models for a new century. In: Rothschild (ed) Design and Feminism: revisioning spaces, places and everyday things. Londres: Rutgers University Press. p. 159-174.

WEISMAN, Leslie K.(2000). Prologue:Women´s environmental rights, a manifesto. In: Rendell et al (eds) Gender Space Architecture. Londres: Routledge.

WEKERLE, Gerda; PETERSON, Rebecca; NORLEY, David (1980). New space for women. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.

Publicado
2016-12-05
Como Citar
Caser, K. (2016). Para além da disciplinaridade e da dicotomia de gênero? A contribuição da praxeologia de Pierre Bourdieu para estudos de gênero em arquitetura e urbanismo. URBANA: Revista Eletrônica Do Centro Interdisciplinar De Estudos Sobre a Cidade, 8(1), 2-27. https://doi.org/10.20396/urbana.v8i1.8642594