Palavras-chave
Covariação
Tecnologias digitais
Revisão sistemática de literatura
Como Citar
Resumo
A covariação envolve o foco em como as variáveis ou quantidades variam em conjunto. Este artigo descreve uma revisão sistemática de literatura que teve por objetivo analisar um quadro recente de pesquisas sobre a abordagem covariacional de função e as possibilidades das tecnologias digitais nessa perspectiva. Os dados foram coletados nas bases Periódicos Capes e Eric, resultando em 26 estudos, dos quais 11 envolveram o uso de tecnologias digitais. Os resultados apontaram: processos cognitivos e dificuldades de aprendizagem associadas ao raciocínio covariacional; especificidades da epistemologia de cada tipo de função; influências didáticas na abordagem de covariação, do currículo ao design de tarefas e o conhecimento de professores; e, por fim, aspectos das tecnologias digitais que podem dar suporte ou limitar o raciocínio covariacional.
Referências
Aranda, C. & Callejo, M. L. (2017) Construcción de la Función Integral y Razonamiento Covariacional: dos Estudios de Casos. Bolema, 31(58), 777-798. https://doi.org/10.1590/1980-4415v31n58a13
Ayalon, M., Watson, A. & Lerman, S. (2015). Functions represented as linear sequential data: relationships between presentation and student responses. Educ Stud Math, 90, 321–339. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-015-9628-9
Ayalon, M., Watson, A. & Lerman, S. (2016) Progression Towards Functions: Students’ Performance on Three Tasks About Variables from Grades 7 to 12. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 14, 1153–1173. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9611-4
Byerley, C., & Thompson, P. (2017). Secondary mathematics teachers’ meanings for measure, slope, and rate of change. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 48, 168-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.09.003
Carlson, M. (1998). A cross-sectional investigation of the development of the function concept. In A.H. Schoenfeld, J. Kaput, & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), Issues in mathematics education: Research in collegiate mathematics education III (Vol. 7, pp. 114–162). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Carlson, M. P., Jacobs, S., Coe, E., Larsen, S., & Hsu, E. (2002). Applying covariational reasoning while modeling dynamic events: A framework and a study. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33, 352–378. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/4149958
Castillo-Garsow, C. C. (2012). Continuous quantitative reasoning. In R. Mayes, R. Bonillia, L. L. Hatfield, & S. Belbase (Eds.), Quantitative reasoning: Current state of understanding, WISDOMe Monographs (Vol. 2, pp. 55–73). Laramie: University of Wyoming.
Confrey, J., & Smith, E. (1994). Exponential functions, rates of change, and the multiplicative unit. Educ Stud Math 26, 135–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01273661
Ellis, A. B., Ozgur, Z., Kulow, T, Dogan, M. F., & Amidon, J. (2016). An Exponential Growth Learning Trajectory: Students’ Emerging Understanding of Exponential Growth Through Covariation, Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 18(3), 151-181. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2016.1183090
Ferrara, F., Pratt, D., & Robutti, O. (2006). The Role and Uses of Technologies for the Teaching of Algebra and Calculu". In The Role and Uses of Technologies for the Teaching of Algebra and Calculus. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill | Sense. doi: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087901127_010
Habre, S. (2017). Students’ challenges with polar functions: covariational reasoning and plotting in the polar coordinate system, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(1), 48-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2016.1220027
Hitt, F., & González-Martín, A.S. (2015). Covariation between variables in a modelling process: The ACODESA (collaborative learning, scientific debate and self-reflection) method. Educ Stud Math, 88, 201–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9578-7
Hohensee, C. (2016). Student noticing in classroom settings: A process underlying influences on prior ways of reasoning. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 42, 69-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.03.002.
Jones, S. R. (2015). Calculus limits involving infinity: the role of students’ informal dynamic reasoning, International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(1), 105-126. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2014.941427
Jones, S. R. (2017). An exploratory study on student understandings of derivatives in real-world, non-kinematics contexts. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 45, 95–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.11.002
Johnson, H. L. (2015). Secondary Students’ Quantification of Ratio and Rate: A Framework for Reasoning about Change in Covarying Quantities, Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 17:1, 64-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986065.2015.981946
Johnson, H. (2015). Together yet separate: Students' associating amounts of change in quantities involved in rate of change. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(1), 89-110. Disponível em: https://www.jstor.org/stable/43590240
Johnson, H.L., McClintock, E., & Hornbein, P. (2017). Ferris wheels and filling bottles: a case of a student’s transfer of covariational reasoning across tasks with different backgrounds and features. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49, 851–864. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-017-0866-4
Johnson, H.L., & McClintock, E. (2018). A link between students’ discernment of variation in unidirectional change and their use of quantitative variational reasoning. Educ Stud Math, 97, 299–316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9799-7
Kaput, J. (1992). Technology and mathematics education. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 515–556). New York: Macmillan.
Lagrange, J-B. (2014). A functional perspective on the teaching of algebra: current challenges and the contribution of technology. The International Journal For Technology in Mathematics Education, hal-01740456, Version 1. Disponível em: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01740456
Lagrange, J., & Psycharis, G. (2014). Investigating the Potential of Computer Environments for the Teaching and Learning of Functions: A Double Analysis from Two Research Traditions. Tech Know Learn, 19, 255–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-013-9211-3
Lima, E. L., Carvalho, P. C. P., Wagner, E., & Morgado, A. C. (2005). A Matemática do Ensino Médio, v.1, 8 ed. Rio de Janeiro: SBM.
Ministério da Educação. (2018). Base Nacional Comum Curricular. Brasilia: MEC. Disponível em: http://basenacionalcomum.mec.gov.br/
Monk, S. (1992). Students' understanding of a function given by a physical model. In G. Harel & E. Dubinsky (Eds.), The concept of function: Aspects of epistemology and pedagogy (pp.175–193). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.
Monk, S., & Nemirovsky, R. (1994). The case of Dan: Student construction of a functional situation through visual attributes. In E. Dubinsky, A. H. Schoenfeld, & J. Kaput (Eds.), Issues in mathematics education: Research in collegiate mathematics education I (Vol 4, pp. 139–168). Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society.
Moore, K. C. (2014). Quantitative reasoning and the sine function: The case of Zac. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 45(1), 102-138. Disponível em: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5951/jresematheduc.45.1.0102
Musgrave, S., & Carlson, M.P. (2017). Understanding and advancing graduate teaching assistants’ mathematical knowledge for teaching. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 45, 137-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2016.12.011
Nagle, C., Tracy, T., Adams, G., & Scutella, D. (2017). The notion of motion: covariational reasoning and the limit concept. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 48(4), 573-586. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2016.1262469
Paoletti, T., & Moore, K. C. (2017) The parametric nature of two students’ covariational reasoning, The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 48, 137-151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.08.003.
Ramos, A., M. Faria, P., & Faria, A. (2014). Revisão sistemática de literatura: contributo para a inovação na investigação em Ciências da Educação. Revista Diálogo Educacional, 14(41), 17-36. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.7213/dialogo.educ.14.041.DS01
Saldanha, L. A., & Thompson, P. W. (1998). Re-thinking co-variation from a quantitative perspective: Simultaneous continuous variation. In S. B. Berenson & W. N. Coulombe (Eds.), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Psychology of Mathematics Education North America (Vol. 1, pp. 298–304). Raleigh: North Carolina State University. Disponível em http://bit.ly/1b4sjQE
Silva, C. T. J. (2022). O uso de um artefato computacional como suporte ao desenvolvimento do raciocínio covariacional em função. (Tese de Doutorado, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Recife, Brasil). Repositório Digital da UFPE. https://repositorio.ufpe.br/handle/123456789/45772
Thompson, P. W. (1994). The development of the concept of speed and its relationship to concepts of rate. In G. Harel & J. Confrey (Eds.), The development of multiplicative reasoning in the learning of mathematics (pp. 179–234). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Thompson, P. W., & Carlson, M. P. (2017). Variation, covariation, and functions: Foundatio-nal ways of thinking mathematically. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathe-matics education (pp. 421-456). Reston: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Thompson, P.W., Hatfield, N., Yoon, H., Joshua, S., & Byerley, C. (2017). Covariational reasoning among U.S. and South Korean secondary mathematics teachers. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 48, 95-111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2017.08.001
Watson, A., Ayalon, M., & Lerman, S. (2018). Comparison of students’ understanding of functions in classes following English and Israeli national curricula. Educ Stud Math 97, 255–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9798-8
Weber, E., & Thompson, P.W. (2014). Students’ images of two-variable functions and their graphs. Educ Stud Math, 87, 67–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-014-9548-0
Wilkie, K.J., & Ayalon, M. (2018). Investigating Years 7 to 12 students’ knowledge of linear relationships through different contexts and representations. Math Ed Res J, 30, 499–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-018-0236-8
Yemen-Karpuzcu, S., Ulusoy, F., & Işıksal-Bostan, M. (2017). Prospective Middle School Mathematics Teachers’ Covariational Reasoning for Interpreting Dynamic Events During Peer Interactions. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 15, 89–108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9668-8
Zengin, Y. (2018). Examination of the constructed dynamic bridge between the concepts of differential and derivative with the integration of GeoGebra and the ACODESA method. Educ Stud Math, 99, 311–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9832-5
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2023 Zetetiké
Downloads
