The rapid growth of information and communication technology since the early 1990s has greatly influenced the accessibility of information on a global level and also has played a critical role in restructuring the mechanisms by which specialized academic knowledge is validated, distributed, and made available to consumers. The primary mechanism for validation and distribution of academic knowledge is that of peer-reviewed publication, and it is this mechanism and its intersection with Internet-based electronic publishing that constitute the focus of this study of attitudes toward scholarship presented in electronic formats.
C.A. Bowers. 1998. Toward a balanced perspective on the educational uses of computers: Advantages, myths, and the responsibilities of educators. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1(1), 75-83.
J.M. Budd. 1995. Faculty publishing productivity: An institutional analysis and comparison with library and other measures. College and Research Libraries, 56, 547-554.
A. Dixon. 1997. Electronic publishing and the academic community: A publisher's perspective. In Ian Butterworth's (Ed.), The impact of electronic publishing on the academic community (Session 1: The present situation and the likely future). International Workshop organized by the Academia Europaea and the Wenner-Gren Foundation, Wenner-Gren Center, Stockholm, Sweden, April 16-20, 1997. [Online]. Available: http://tiepac.portlandpress.co.uk/books/online/tiepac/session1/ch2.htm
Florida Board of Regents. 2000. Florida Board of Regents: University information. [Online]. Available: http://www.borfl.org/univ_info/unitour.asp
S. Harnad, Ed. 1982. Peer commentary on peer review: A case study in scientific quality control. NY: Cambridge University Press.
S. Harnad. 1986. Policing the paper chase. (Review of S. Lock, A difficult balance: Peer review in biomedical publication.) Nature, 322, 24-5.
S. Harnad. 1996. Implementing peer review on the Net: Scientific quality control in scholarly electronic journals. In R. Peek & G. Newby's (Eds.), Scholarly publication: The electronic frontier (pp. 103-108). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. [Online]. Available: ftp://ftp.princeton.edu/pub/harnad/Harnad/HTML/harnad96.peer.review.html
R. Kling and L. Covi. 1995. Electronic journals and legitimate media in the systems of scholarly communication. The Information Society, 11(4), 261-271. [Online]. Available: http://www.ics.uci.edu/~kling/klingej2.html
T.S. Kuhn. 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd edition). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. Merriam-Webster. 1976. Webster's new collegiate dictionary. Springfield, MA: Author.
V.H. Resh 1998. Science and communication: An author/editor/user's perspective on the transition from paper to electronic publishing. Issues in Science & Technology Librarianship, 19. [Online]. Available: http://www.library.ucsb.edu/istl/98-summer/article3.html
P. Roberts. 1999. Scholarly publishing, peer review and the Internet. First Monday, 4(4). [Online]. Available: http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue4_4/proberts/index.html
M. Ryder. 1997. The peer review process: Excerpts from major articles. [Online]. Available: http://www.cudenver.edu/~mryder/peer/peer_review.html
J.J.Seneca. 1999. Memorandum to Provosts, Deans, Directors, and Department Chairs (1999-2000 Academic Reappointment/Promotion Instructions). [Online]. Available: http://www.rutgers.edu/oldqueens/instruct.doc
H.R. Varian. 1997. The future of electronic journals: Some speculations about the evolution of academic electronic publishing. Paper presented at the Scholarly Communication and Technology Conference, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, April 1997. [Online]. Available: http://arl.cni.org/scomm/scat/varian.html
S. Whisler. 1997. The economic realities of journal publishing. Newsletter on Serials Pricing Issues. 172.3 [Online]. Available: http://cadmus.lib.unc.edu/prices/1997/PRIC172.HTML#172.3 [September 1997].
A ETD - Educação Temática Digital utiliza a licença do Creative Commons (CC), preservando assim, a integridade dos artigos em ambiente de acesso aberto.