Virada icônica

Um apelo por três voltas no parafuso

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24978/mod.v3i1.4077

Palavras-chave:

Virada pictórica, Imagem, Iconologia, Imagens subjuntivas.

Resumo

No início dos anos 1990, W.J.T. Mitchell e Gottfried Boehm proclamaram, de forma independente, que as humanidades estavam testemunhando uma "virada pictórica" ou "icônica". Vinte anos depois, podemos nos perguntar se este anúncio estava descrevendo um evento que já havia ocorrido ou se era um chamado para que isso acontecesse. O mundo contemporâneo é, mais do que nunca, determinado por artefatos visuais. Ainda assim, nosso arsenal conceitual, forjado durante séculos de logocentrismo, ainda está aquém da complexidade do significado pictórico. Este ensaio tem duas partes. Na primeira, tenta avaliar o significado exato da "virada pictórica"/"icônica" e o (re)coloca no contexto dos estudos visuais anglo-americanos e da Bildwissenschaften alemã. Na segunda aborda a famosa afirmação do filólogo Ernst Robert Curtius de que "as ciências da imagem são fáceis" ao defender três "voltas no parafuso" para tornar os estudos visuais algo mais difícil: uma mudança da iconologia para a sintomatologia, uma mudança do extensivo para intensivo e uma mudança do indicativo para o subjuntivo.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Biografia do Autor

Emmanuel Alloa, University of St.Gallen

Pesquisador Sênior de filosofia na Faculdade de Ciências Humanas e Sociais na Universidade St. Gallen.

Referências

AGAMBEN, Giorgio. [1975] Aby Warburg and the nameless science. Potentialities. Translated by Daniel Heller-Roazen. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press 1999, p. 89-103.

ALLOA, Emmannuel. Changer de sens. Quelques effets du tournant iconique. Critique, n. 759-760, 2010, p. 647-658.

______. Intensive, not extensive. In: ELKINS, J.; NAEF, M. (eds). What is an Image? The Stone Art Theory Summer Institutes, vol. 2. University Park, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press: 2011a, p. 148-151.

______. Seeing-as, seeing-in, seeing-with. In: NEMETH, E.; HEINRICH, R.; PICHLER, W.; WAGNER, D. (eds), Image and imaging in Philosophy, Science, and the Arts. Volume I. Proceedings of the 33rd International Wittgenstein Symposium. Frankfurt: Ontos: 2011b, p. 179-190.

______. Machen, Durchmachen, Erproben. Zur Medialität von Versuchsanordnungen. In RAUTZENBER, Markus; WOLFSTEINER Andreas (eds), Trial and error. Szenarien medialen Handelns. Munich-Paderborn: W. Fink: 2013, p. 45-56.

______. Getting in touch. In KEARNEY, Richard and TREANOR, Brian (eds), Carnal hermeneutics. New York: Fordham University Press: 2015, p. 57-72.

AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 5th edition (DSM-5). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2013.

ARNHEIM, Rudolf. Visual thinking. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 2004.

BARTHES, Roland. Camera lucida. Reflections on photography. Translated by Richard Howard. New York: Hill and Wang, 1980.

BERGSON, Henry. [1888]. Time and free will, an essay on the immediate data of consciousness. Translated by F. L. Pogson and M. A. Mineola. New York: Dover Publications, 2001.

BLUMENBERG, Hans. [1960]. Paradigms for a metaphorology. Translated and with an afterword by Robert Savage. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2010.

BRANDT, B. Writing political history after the ‘iconic turn’. In: STEINMETZ, W.; GILCHER-HOLTEY, I.; HAUPT, H.-G. (eds). Writing political history today. Frankfurt: P. Lang, 2013, p. 351-å357.

BREDEKAMP, Horst. A neglected tradition? Art history as Bildwissenschaft. Critical Inquiry 29: 3, 2003, p. 418-428.

BOEHM, Gottfried. Das Paradigma ‘Bild’. Die Tragweite der ikonischen Episteme. In: BELTING, H. (ed). Bilderfragen. Die Bildwissenschaften im Aufbruch. Munich: Fink, 2007, p. 77-82.

BOEHM, G.; MITCHELL, W. J. T. Pictorial versus iconic turn: two letters. Culture, Theory and Critique 50: 2–3, 2009, p. 103-121.

BOISSIER DE SAUVAGES DE LACROIX, F. Nosologia methodica, 5 volumes. Amsterdam: Fratrum de Tournes, 1763.

BURKE, Peter. Eyewitnessing. The uses of images as historical evidence. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2001.

BREIDBACH, O. Imaging science: the pictorial turn in Bio- and Neuroscience. In: GRAU, Oliver (ed). Imagery in the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2013, p. 111-128.

BRETON, André. [1924]. Les pas perdus. In: BONNET, Marguerite (ed.), Œuvres complètes, Vol. 1. Paris: Gallimard, 1998, p. 193-308.

CURTIS, Neal. As if. Situating the pictorial turn. In ______. (ed). The Pictorial turn. New York: Routledge, 2010, p. 1-7.

CURTIUS, E. R. European literature and the latin Middle Ages. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1973.

DIDI-HUBERMAN, Georges. [1990]. Confronting images. Questioning the ends of a certain history of art. Translated by John Goodman. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania University Press, 2005.

______. L’image survivante. Histoire de l’art et temps des fantômes selon Aby Warburg. Paris: Minuit, 2002.

ECO, Umberto. Mirrors. In: Semiotics and the philosophy of language. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1984, p. 202-227.

ELKINS, James. Ten ways to make visual studies more difficult. In: Visual studies. A skeptical introduction. New York: Routledge, 2003, p. 63-123.

ELKINS, James; MANGHANI, Frank G. S. (eds). Farewell to visual studies. Stone Summer Seminars, vol. 5. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press, 2015.

EISENSTEIN, Sergei. [1942]. Dickens, Griffith and Ourselves. In: TAYLOR, Richard (ed). Eisenstein: writings, 1934-1947. Translated by William Powell. London: BFI, 1966, p. 193-238.

FOUCAULT, Michel. [1967]. Les mots et les images. In: DEFERT, Daniel; EWALD, François (eds). Dits et ecrits. Vol. I: 1954-1969. Paris: Gallimard, 1994, p. 620-623.

FREEDBERG, David. The power of images. Studies in the history and theory of response. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1989.

FREUD, Sigmund. [1895]. Studies on hysteria. In: STRACHEY, J. (ed). The Standard edition of the complete psychological works, vol. II. London: Hogarth Press, 1956-74.

GAMBONI, Dario. Potential images ambiguity and indeterminacy in modern art. London: Reaktion, 2004.

GINZBURG, Carlo. Clues. Roots of an evidential paradigm. Theory and Society, 7: 3, 1979, p. 273-288.

GOODMAN, Nelson [1977]. When is art? In: Ways of worldmaking. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1988, p. 57–70.

GUMBRECHT, H. U. The production of presence. What meaning cannot convey. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2003.

HECKSCHER, W. S. [1969]. Erwin Panofsky. A curriculum vitae. In: PANOFSKY, E. (ed). Three essays of style. Cambridge, MA: MIT University Press, 1995, p. 169-97.

HUSSERL, Edmund. Phantasy, image consciousness and memory (1898-1925). Translated J. Brough. Dordrecht: Springer, 2005.

IMDAHL, M. Giotto. Arenafresken. Ikonographie, Ikonologie, Ikonik. Munich: W. Fink, 1980.

JONES, C.; GALISON, P. Picturing science. producing art. London and New York: Routledge, 1998.

KONERSMANN, Ralf. (ed). Wörterbuch der philosophischen Metaphern. Third expanded edition. Darmstadt: WBG, 2011.

KRAUSS, Rosalind. Notes on the index. Seventies art in America. October n. 3-4, 1977, p. 68–81.

LYOTARD, Jean-François. [1971]. Discourse, figure. Translated by A. Hudek and M. Lydon, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2011.

MERLEAU-PONTY, Maurice. [1961]. Eye and mind. In: JOHNSON, Galen A. (ed). The Merleau-Ponty aesthetics reader: philosophy and painting. Chicago: Northwestern University Press, 1993, p. 59-149.

MIROWSKI, Philip (ed). Natural images in economic thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

MITCHELL, W. J. T. Picture theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1994.

MOXEY, K. Visual studies and the iconic turn. Journal of Visual Culture, 7: 2, p. 131-146.

PÄCHT, O. 1956. Panofsky’s early netherlandish painting II. Burlington Magazine 98, 2008, p. 266–279.

______. [1977]. Kritik der Ikonologie. In: KAEMMERLING, E. (ed). Ikonographie und Ikonologie. Theorien, Entwicklung, Probleme. Köln: DuMont, 1987, p. 353–375.

PANOFSKY, Erwin. Studies in iconology. humanistic themes in the art of the Renaissance. New York: Oxford University Press, 1939.

______. Iconography and iconology. An introduction to the study of Renaissance art. In: Meaning in the Visual Arts. New York: Doubleday, 1955, p. 26-41.

______. ‘The Ideological antecedents of the Rolls-Royce radiator’. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 107: 4, 1963, p. 273-288.

______. ‘Préface à l’édition française’. In: Essais d’iconologie. Les thèmes humanistes dans l’art de la Renaissance. Translated by C. Herbette and B. Teyssèdre. Paris: Gallimard, 1967, p. 3-6.

______. [1921]. Albrecht Dürer and Classical Antiquity. In: Meaning in the visual arts. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1970, p. 236-94.

______. [1934/36]. ‘Style and medium in the motion pictures’. In: MAST, Gerald; COHEN, Marshall (eds). Film theory and criticism. New York: Oxford University Press, 1985, p. 215-233.

______. [1932]. ‘On the problem of describing and interpreting works of the visual arts’. Translated by J. Elsner and K. Lorenz. Critical Inquiry, 38:3, 2012, p. 467-482.

PINOTTI, Andrea. Memorie del neutro. Morfologia dell’immagine in Aby Warburg. Milan: Mimesis, 2001.

RIPA, Cesare. Iconologia overo descrittione dell’imagini universali cavate dall’Antichità et da altri luoghi. Rome: L. Facij, 1603.

RORTY, Richard (ed). The linguistic turn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967.

SACHS-HOMBACH, K. (ed). Bildwissenschaft. Disziplinen, Methoden, Themen. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2005.

STOLLEIS, M. The eye of the law. London: Taylor & Francis, 2009.

SARTRE, Jean-Paul. [1940]. The imaginary. A phenomenological psychology of the imagination. Translated by J. Webber. New York: Routledge, 2010.

SONTAG, Susan. On photography. New York: Penguin, 1977.

VALÉRY, Paul. Philosophy of The dance. In: COPELAND, Roger; COHEN, Marshall, (eds). What is dance. Readings in theory and criticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983, p. 55-65.

VERCELLONE, Federico. Morfologie del moderno. Genova: Il Melangolo, 2006.

VISUAL CULTURE QUESTIONNAIRE, summer. October n. 77, 1996.

WALTON, Kendall. Marvelous images. On values and the arts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008.

WARBURG, Aby. [1912]. Italian art and international Astrology in the Palazzo Schifanoia, Ferrara. In: WARBURG, A.; BING, G.; ROUGEMONT, F.; LINDBERG, S. (eds). The renewal of pagan Antiquity: contributions to the cultural history of the european Renaissance. Vol. II. Los Angeles: The Getty Research Institute, 1999, p. 563-591.

Downloads

Publicado

2019-01-18

Como Citar

ALLOA, E. Virada icônica: Um apelo por três voltas no parafuso. MODOS: Revista de História da Arte, Campinas, SP, v. 3, n. 1, p. 91–113, 2019. DOI: 10.24978/mod.v3i1.4077. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/mod/article/view/8662932. Acesso em: 1 dez. 2022.

Edição

Seção

Dossiê - A Emergência da imagem crítica