Abstract
This article deals with the current gap between advances in science and technology, as well as the changing role of art museums towards being educational centers, the dichotomy between reason and sensitivity, and the need to incorporate into the totality of education the development of the capacity of "thinking-art". This confabulation of facts is expressed symbolically in the "school classroom", as an epigone of an exhausted system, which has shown its failure, and that nevertheless insists on enclosing students in cubes-cells to submit to an inequitable distribution of power, which has proven ineffective and obsolescent. The article has different sections, including the architectural resignification of the classroom, and the emergence of educational leaders who seem more like vendors, struggling to appropriate a large area of the market with their bestsellers, than academics intent on revolutionizing education. In parallel, artists of merit, supplanting those who once graduated from Normal Schools or Teacher Colleges, are the real leaders who contribute to educational change and move towards a necessary educational revolution. That contribution is based on the freedom that arises from aesthetic pleasure, or "feeling-art," which, as illustrated by an eloquent anecdote about the discovery of DNA, could be of fundamental importance to the progress of humanity.
References
CAMNITZER Luis. Entrevista. Periódico ABC, Madrid, febrero 2, 2017. Accesible en http://www.abc.es/cultura/cultural/abci-arte-instrumento-para-mejorar-sociedad-201702020153_noticia.html
_____________. Didáctica de la liberación. Montevideo: Casa Editorial HUM - Dist. Gussi, 2008.
DAMASIO, Antonio. The feeling of what Happens. New York: Mariner Books, 1999.
DEWEY, John. El arte como experiencia. Madrid: Paidos estética, 1980.
GIRO, Radamés. El Filin de César Portillo de la Luz. Cuba (impreso en Colombia): Editorial Unión, 1997.
JOHNSON, Gregory. Theories of Emotion. Visitado en: http://www.iep.utm.edu/emotion/
KOHAN, Walter. ¿La escuela hace filosofía o la filosofía hace una escuela?. Rio de Janeiro: Universidad del Estado de Rio de Janeiro, 2016. Accesible en: https://www.academia.edu/9911426/_La_escuela_hace_filosof%C3%ADa_o_la_filosof%C3%ADa_hace_una_escuela
LAKOFF G.; JOHNSON M. Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1980.
NAUSSBAUM, Martha. Cultivating Humanity. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press, 1998.
PALOMO, Alberto. Guía Rápida del trabajo del futuro, El País, mayo 1, 17, 2017.
PIRE, Michael; SOREL, Charles. The Second Industrial Divide, Possibilities for Prosperity. New York: Basic Books, 1984.
PRIETO PARRA, Murcia. La práctica pedagógica en el aula: un análisis crítico. Revista Educación y Pedagogía 4, 1990. Visitada en https://aprendeenlinea.udea.edu.co/revistas/index.php/revistaeyp/article/viewFile/5624/5045
ROJO, Marcelo. El jardín de los mundos que se ramifican: Borges y la Mecánica Cuántica. En: Borges en Diez Miradas. Buenos Aires: Fundación Edenor, 1999.
___________ Física del Cantautor. En: Arte y Ciencia. Plaza y Valdés (España y México), 2009.
TEDESCO, J. C.; PORTER, L. Políticas de subjetividad para la igualdad de oportunidades educativas. Un diálogo entre Juan Carlos Tedesco y Luis Porter. Revista Electrónica de Investigación Educativa, 8 (1), 2006. Consultado el día 27 de mes de agosto en el año 2016 en: http://redie.uabc.mx/vol8no1/contenido-porter2.html
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2018 MODOS