French Suite. Georges Didi-Huberman, an experiment in History of art
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

História da arte. Filosofia. Visual. Imagens. Iconologia.

How to Cite

HUCHET, Stéphane. French Suite. Georges Didi-Huberman, an experiment in History of art. MODOS, Campinas, SP, v. 4, n. 3, p. 193–208, 2020. DOI: 10.24978/mod.v4i3.4605. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/mod/article/view/8662705. Acesso em: 20 may. 2024.

Abstract

Georges Didi-Huberman’s books articulate a dense knowledge to produce what he proposed to call “anthropology of the visual”. This position has a neowarburgian character, although at the beginning of his career he did not rely on Aby Warburg, which he had not yet integrated into his pantheon. Anthropology which no longer represents a risk, but a chance for the History of art. Artistic pictures, observed and analyzed with great critical attention, reveal processes that his in-depth knowledge of philosophy legitimizes him to call “dialectic”. His first ideas and arguments, disseminated in several books that followed each other at an annual pace, found in Warburg, around 2000, a model of confirmation and consolidation. Didi-Huberman’s historiography and philosophy of art were built through books which privilege artists, thinkers, critics (Fra Angelico, Giorgio Vasari, Erwin Panofsky, Sigmund Freud, Georges Bataille, Carl Einstein, Aby Warburg, Alberto Giacometti, Marcel Duchamp, Walter Benjamin, Bertold Brecht, os minimalistas, Pier-Paolo Pasolini, Giorgio Agamben) who instigate a History of art which is a practical philosophy of image and time.

https://doi.org/10.24978/mod.v4i3.4605
PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

COLI, J. Polaridades e anacronismos no pensamento de Warburg. MODOS. Revista de História da Arte. Campinas, v. 1, n.2, p.09-21, mai. 2017. Disponível em: ˂https://doi.org/10.24978/mod.v1i2.755 ˃.

DIDI-HUBERMAN, Georges. La peinture incarnée, suivi de Le chef-d’œuvre inconnu par Honoré de Balzac. Paris: Les éditions de Minuit, 1985. (A Pintura Encarnada, seguido de A obra-prima desconhecida de Honoré de Balzac. São Paulo: Editora da Fap-Unifesp/Editora Escuta. Tradução de Osvaldo Fontes Filho e Leila de Aguiar Costa, 2012).

_____. Le Cube et le visage. Autour d’une sculpture d’Alberto Giacometti. Paris: Macula, 1993.

_____. L’Empreinte. Catálogo de exposição. Paris : Centre Georges Pompidou, 1997.

_____. L’Étoilement. Conversation avec Simon Hantaï. Paris : les éditions de Minuit, 1998a.

_____. L’anachronisme fabrique l’histoire de l’art: sur l’inactualité de Carl Einstein. In: Études Germaniques: Revue de la Société des Études Germaniques, LIII, Paris: Didier érudition, janvier-mars, 1998b. (Retomado no capítulo L’image-combat. In: Devant le temps (2000).

_____. Fra Angelico: Dissemblance et figuration. Paris: Flammarion, col. Champs, 1990a.

_____. Devant l’image. Questions posées aux fins d’une histoire de l’art. Paris: Les éditions de Minuit, 1990b. (Diante da imagem: Questões postas aos fins de uma história da arte. São Paulo: Ed. 34, 2013).

_____. Régions de dissemblance. Catálogo de exposição, Musée Départemental de Rochechouart, 1990c.

_____. Phasmes. Essais sur l’apparition. Paris: Les éditions de Minuit, 1998c.

_____. Devant le temps: Histoire de l’art et anachronisme des images. Paris: Éditions de Minuit, 2000. (Diante do tempo. História da arte e anacronismo das imagens. Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG. Tradução de Márcia Arbex e Vera Casa Nova, 2015).

_____. Ser crânio. Lugar, contato, pensamento, escultura. Belo Horizonte : C/Arte. Tradução de Augustin de Tugny e Vera Casa Nova, 2009. (Être crâne. Lieu, contact, pensée, sculpture. Paris: L es éditions de Minuit, 2000).

_____. L’image survivante: Histoire de l’art et temps des fantômes selon Aby Warburg. Paris: Les éditions de Minuit, 2002. (A imagem sobrevivente. História da arte e tempo dos fantasmas segundo Aby Warburg. São Paulo: Contraponto, 2013).

_____. Sobrevivência dos vaga-lumes, Belo Horizonte: Editora UFMG. Tradução de Vera Casa Nova e Márcia Arbex, 2011. (Survivance des lucioles. Paris: Éditions de Minuit, 2010.).

_____. “Quadro = Corte’ – Experiência Visual, Forma e Sintoma segundo Carl Einstein” [1996]. In: HUCHET, Stéphane (org.). Fragmentos de uma teoria da arte. São Paulo: Edusp, 2012, p. 61-95.

_____. Passés cités par JLG. L’œil de l’histoire, 5. Paris: Les éditions de Minuit, 2015.

_____. Désirer désobéir: Ce qui nous soulève, 1. Paris: Les éditions de Minuit, 2019.

PANOFSKY, Erwin. Idea. A evolução do conceito de Belo. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2000.

SCHAEFFER, Jean-Marie. L’art de l’âge moderne: L’esthétique et la philosophie de l’art du XVIIIème siècle à nos jours. Paris: Gallimard (NRF essais), 1992.

SEMINÁRIO GEORGES DIDI-HUBERMAN 2016. Campinas. Instituto de Artes da Unicamp. 22 e 23 nov. 2016. Disponível em: ˂https://www.iar.unicamp.br/evento/seminariogdh2016/˃. Acesso em: maio 2020.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2020 MODOS

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.