Banner Portal
Tecnologias assistivas e pos-humanismo
PDF (English)


ciborgue low-tech
inclusão social

Como Citar

KATH, E.; COELHO NETO, O.; BUZATO, M. E. K. . Tecnologias assistivas e pos-humanismo : sobre a inclusão/exclusão social dos ciborgues Low-Tech. Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada, Campinas, SP, v. 58, n. 2, p. 679–703, 2019. Disponível em: Acesso em: 7 jun. 2023.


Este artigo discorre sobre as consequências de uma perspectiva pós-humanista para o problema de deficiência física, abordando o uso de tecnologias assistivas (TA) por pessoas com deficiência como a introdução de um ciborgue low-tech no mundo. Ao fazê-lo, destacamos exemplos de TAs de comunicação e fornecemos analogias entre TAs e línguas na constituição do Self e do contexto social. TAs são informadas ideologicamente, de modo que podem ser vistas tanto como uma maneira de “consertar” uma pessoa “incapacitada”, quanto como uma estratégia para superar um contexto físico e social que incapacita algumas pessoas e torna outras pessoas “capazes”. Argumentamos que tornar-se um ciborgue low-tech pode ser uma forma de inclusão social se entendermos que a deficiência é produzida pelo contexto, e não uma disfuncionalidade inerente ao indivíduo. Com base nesse pressuposto, identificamos duas estratégias de inclusão social do ciborgue low-tech: desincorporação do Self e virtualidade corporificada. Destacamos, no entanto, que ciborgues low-tech podem ser configurados por necessidade ou por escolha e acrescentamos que os mesmos fatores socioeconômicos que produzem desigualdade em geral são ativos na também na sua exclusão/inclusão social. Assim, TAs adotadas por escolha podem se transformar em uma maneira de ampliar o fosso entre ciborgues ricos e pobres, sendo que os dois tipos de ciborgues podem estar cada vez mais sujeitos à exploração cognitiva e afetiva no contexto do Capitalismo Cognitivo. Nós concluímos que uma perspectiva pós-humanista da deficiência não é sobre tornar inteiros “seres humanos com deficiência”, nem sobre tornar “humanos inteiros” mais do que humanos, mas sobre como manter o Self e o outro conectados eticamente, quer em condicoes de desincorporacao do Self, ou de virtualidade incorporada.
Palavras-chave: ciborgue low-tech; deficiência; inclusão social.

PDF (English)


BARAD, K. (2003) Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, v.28, n.3, pp. 801-31.

BARNES, C., & MERCER, G. J. (2001). Disability culture. IN: Handbook of disability studies. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, pp. 515-34.

BEYOND BLUE. (2019). Beyond Blue Support Service. Retrieved from: Last accessed: 10 April 2019

BOWLES, N. (2019). Human Contact is Now a Luxury Good, The New York Times, 23 March. Retrieved from: Last accessed: 10 April 2019

BRAIDOTTI, R. (2016). Posthuman Critical Theory. In: Banerji, D.; Paranjape, M. (eds) Critical Posthumanism and Planetary Futures. Springer, New Delhi, pp. 13-32

BREWSTER, K. (2016). Digital detox: A family’s struggle with technology addiction, ABC News, 13 September. Retrieved from: Last accessed: 10 April 2019

BROWN, V. (2016). The digital addiction that has teens wearing nappies so they don’t need a toilet break., 8 June. Retrieved from: Last accessed: 10 April 2019

BUZATO, M. E. K. (2017), Towards a theoretical mashup for studying posthuman/postsocial ethics, Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society, V. 15, nº 01, pp. 74-89.

CAMPBELL, F. (2009). Contours of ableism: The production of disability and abledness: London: Palgrave Macmillan Ed., 2009

CASE, A. (2010). What is a Cyborg? Retrieved from: <>. Last accessed: 22 June 2019.

CHANG, Y.J., CHEN, S.F., & HUANG, J.D. (2011). A Kinect-based system for physical rehabilitation: A pilot study for young adults with motor disabilities. Research in developmental disabilities, v.32, nº 6, pp. 2566-2570.

CLYNES, M. E., & KLINE, N. (1960). Cyborgs and space , Astronautics, September: 26–7 and 74–5. Reprinted in Gray, Mentor, and Figueroa-Sarriera. 1995. IN: The cyborg handbook . New York Routledge, pp. 29 – 34.

COCO, A. P. (2010). Diseased, maimed, mutilated: categorizations of disability and an ugly law in late nineteenth-century chicago. journal of social history, v. 44, nº 1, pp. 23-37.

COOK, A. M., & HUSSEY, S. M. (1995). Assistive technologies : principles and practice. St. Louis: Mosby Ed., 1995.

DEVLIN, A & LAKE, E. (2018). What is a robot sex doll, how much do they cost and what is the sex robot brothel in Paris? The Sun Online - UK Editions, London. Retrieved from: <>. Last accesseded: 19 jan. 2019.

EDYBURN, D. L. (2001). Critical issues in special education technology research: What do we know? What do we need to know? In: Technological Applications, v. 15, pp. 95-117.

FOSTER, M. (2018). Aging Japan: Robots may have role in future of elder care. Reuters, US Edition. Retrieved from: <>. Last accessed: 23 June 2019.

GOODWIN, C.; DURANTI, A. (1992). Rethinking Context: an Introduction. In: Duranti, A; Goodwin, C. (Org.). Rethinking context: language as an interactive phenomenon. Cambridge [England]; New York: Cambridge University Press, v. 11, pp. 1-42.

GOOSEY-TOLFREY, V., & MINETTI, A. (2005). Biomechanics and energetics of basketball wheelchairs evolution. International journal of sports medicine, v. 26, nº 05, pp. 388-396.

GRAY, C. H., FIGUEROA-SARRIERA, H. J., & MENTOR, S. (1995). The cyborg handbook.

GRIFFIN, G. (2017). A dictionary of gender studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

HALACY, D. S. (1965). Cyborg: Evolution of the superman. Harper & Row.

HAMILTON, M. T., HAMILTON, D. G., & ZDERIC, T. W. (2007). Role of low energy expenditure and sitting in obesity, metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Diabetes, v. 56, nº 11, pp. 2655-2667.

HAMPTON, K. N., SESSIONS, L. F., HER, E. J., & RAINIE, L. (2009). Social isolation and new technology. Washington, DC: Pew Internet and American Life Project. Retrieved from, Last accessed: 11 June 2019.

HAYLES,K. (1999). How we became posthuman: virtual bodies in cybernetics, literature, and informatics. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago Press Ed., 1999.

HEETER, C. (2000). Interactivity in the Context of Designed Experiences. Journal of Interactive Advertising, v.1, nº 1, pp. 3-14.

HERR, H. (2018). How we’ll become cyborgs and extend human potential. MIT Media Lab. Retrieved from: Last accessed: 10 June 2019.

HESS, D. J. (1995). On low-tech cyborgs. In: The cyborg handbook, New York: Routledge, pp. 371-378.

HOLLOWAY, G. (1994). Susto and the career path of the victim of an industrial accident: a sociological case study. Social Science & Medicine, v. 38, nº 7, 989-997.

IRWIN, C. B., & SESTO, M. E. (2012). Performance and touch characteristics of disabled and non-disabled participants during a reciprocal tapping task using touch screen technology. Applied ergonomics, v. 43, nº 6, pp. 1038-1043.

JAMES, P. (1996) Nation formation: Towards a theory of abstract community. London: Thousand Oaks. Ed., 1996

JAMES, P. (2014) ‘Emotional Ambivalence across Times and Spaces: Mapping Petrarch’s Intersecting Worlds’, Exemplaria, v. 26 . nº 1, pp. 81-104.

JAMES, P. AND KATH, E. (2014) Siracusa. (2014). Global reconciliation: Responding to tension through a local-global process. London, United Kingdom: SAGE Publications. Ed., 2014.

JENKINS, R. (1998). Culture, classification and (in)competence. In: Questions of competence: Culture, classification and intellectual disability: Cambridge University Press., pp. 1

KIM, J., LAROSE, R., & PENG, W. (2009). Loneliness as the cause and the effect of problematic Internet use: The relationship between Internet use and psychological well-being. CyberPsychology Behavior, v. 12, nº 4, pp. 451-455.

MAHON, P. (2017). Posthumanism: A guide for the perplexed. Bloomsbury Publishing. Ed., 2017

MEYER, B., & ASBROCK, F. (2018). Disabled or Cyborg? How Bionics Affect Stereotypes Toward People With Physical Disabilities. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 9, pp. 1-13

MILLER, V. (2012). A Crisis of Presence: On-line Culture and Being in the World. Space and Polity, v. 16, nº 3, pp. 265-285.

MITRA, S. (2006). The Capability Approach and Disability. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, v. 16, nº 4, pp. 236-247.

MORE, M. (1990), Principles of Extropy, Version 3:11, 2003. Retrieved from: Last accessed: 22 June 2019.

MOSER, I. (2000). Against normalisation: subverting norms of ability and disability. Science as culture, v. 9, nº 2, pp. 201-240.

MOSER, I. (2005). On becoming disabled and articulating alternatives: The multiple modes of ordering disability and their interferences. Cultural Studies, v. 19, nº 6, pp. 667-700.

MOULIER-BOUTANG, Y. (2011). Cognitive capitalism. Cambridge, UK; Malden, MA: Polity Press, 2011.

MUHAMMAD, N. M., SCHNEIDER, M., HILL, A., & YAU, D. M. (2019). How the Use of iPad and Smartphones Creates Social Isolation. Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. Las Vegas, NV, United States: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), pp. 1060-1065.

NAYAR, P. K. a. (2014). Posthumanism. Cambridge: Polity Press. Ed., 2014.

OLIVER, M. B., COLIN. (2012). The new politics of disablement. Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan. Ed., 2012.

PHILLIPS, T. (2017). Electronic heroin: China’s boot camps get tough on internet addicts. The Guardian,29 august. Retrieved from: Last accessed: 22 June 2019

QUINLAN, M., & BATES, B. (2009). Bionic Woman (2007): Gender, disability and cyborgs. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs : JORSEN., v. 9, nº 1, pp. 48-58.

REEVE, D. (2012). Cyborgs, Cripples and iCrip: Reflections on the Contribution of Haraway to Disability Studies. In D. Goodley, B. Hughes, & L. Davis (Eds.), Disability and Social Theory: New Developments and Directions. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 91-111.

SCHAUBERT, V. (2019). My disabled’s son amazing gaming life in the World of Warcraft. BBC, 07 feb. Retrieved from: Last accessed: 22 June 2019

SHAKESPEARE, T. (2013). Disability rights and wrongs revisited: New York: Routledge. Ed., 2014.

SHARP, G. (1985). Constitutive abstraction and social practice. Arena, v. 70, 48-82.

SHARP, G. (1993). Extended forms of the social: technological mediation and self-formation. Arena Journal, v.1, pp. 221-237.

SINGH, M. (2019). Compulsive digital gaming: an emerging mental health disorder in children. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics, v. 86, nº 2, pp. 171-173.

UN (2006). Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities and optional protocol. New York: United Nations. Retrieved from: Last accessed: 22 June 2019

UPIAS (The Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation and The Disability Alliance discuss Fundamental Principles of Disability). Retrieved from: Last accessed: 11 June 2019.

WITTINK, H., ENGELBERT, R., TAKKEN, T. (2011). The Dangers of inactivity; exercise and inactivity physiology for the manual therapist. Manual therapy, v. 16, nº 3, pp. 209-216.

WHO – World Health Organization (2018). ‘Gaming disorder’. Retrieved from: Last acessed: 4 June 2019.

O periódico Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada utiliza a licença do Creative Commons (CC), preservando assim, a integridade dos artigos em ambiente de acesso aberto, em que:

  • A publicação se reserva o direito de efetuar, nos originais, alterações de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical, com vistas a manter o padrão culto da língua, respeitando, porém, o estilo dos autores;
  • Os originais não serão devolvidos aos autores;
  • Os autores mantêm os direitos totais sobre seus trabalhos publicados na Trabalhos de Linguística Aplicada, ficando sua reimpressão total ou parcial, depósito ou republicação sujeita à indicação de primeira publicação na revista, por meio da licença CC-BY;
  • Deve ser consignada a fonte de publicação original;
  • As opiniões emitidas pelos autores dos artigos são de sua exclusiva responsabilidade.


Não há dados estatísticos.