Keywords
sociocultural autonomy
language practices
How to Cite
Abstract
Transnational movements raised by globalization to a status of normality, let alone to absolute necessity, have reshaped the world and social practices (VERTOVEC, 2007; WEI & HUA, 2013). As a social practice, language dimension acquires a renewed importance in the way people use and consume languages functioning as an agent in the exercise of social and political power. Language ideologies whether individual or socioculturally constructed may be source of empowerment or, otherwise disempowerment, forging asymmetries in the way people consume languages. Thus, the pursuit of autonomy in language learning with the combination of its technical, psychological, sociocultural and political dimensions constitutes a space for (inter)personal emancipation and social transformation. Our theoretical framework emphasizes the collective aspects of learner autonomy, based on the sociocultural autonomy concept (OXFORD, 2003). Drawing on Bakhtin’s (1929/2006;1981) and Vygotsky’s (1991) contributions used as groundwork for research in learner autonomy and in consonance with ideas of fluid and hybrid identities (HALL, 1992; BAUMAN, 2005; MOITA LOPES, 2006), this paper discusses agency, empowerment and identity through sociocultural autonomy development in multicultural environments. This article is the result of two research projects conducted separately by the authors in two different contexts but related to the same research interest, which is language learning autonomy and agency in the continuous process of (re)constructing identities. Data generation was based on interviews with two speakers of Brazilian Portuguese and learners of English as an additional language, while taking part in exchange programs for international mobility – one of them in the U.S and another one in Australia. Results show that both participants seem to reframe their multiple identities, so that they adapt and readapt themselves to the new communities of practice - COPs, in which they have emerged in. Factors like agency, empowerment and sociocultural autonomy seem to be essential and decisive in this process of reframing identities.References
ARCHANJO, R. (2015) Globalização e Multilingualismo no Brasil Competência Linguística e o Programa Ciência Sem Fronteiras. Rev. bras. linguist. apl., vol.15, no.3, p.621-656. ISSN 1984-6398
ARCHANJO, R. (2016) Saberes sem Fronteiras: Políticas para as migrações Pós-modernas. DELTA, vol.32, no.2, p.515-541. ISSN 0102-4450
ARCHANJO, R. (2017) Moving Globally to Transform Locally? Academic mobility and language policy in the Brazilian context. Language Policy, v.16, nº3, p. 291-312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10993-016-9408-0
ANDERSON. B. (1983/2006) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism -revised edition. New York: Verso.
BAUMAN, Z. (2004) Identity: Conversations with Benedetto Vecchi. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
BAKHTIN, M. (1981) The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Austin: University of Texas Press.
BAKHTIN, M.; VOLOCHINOV, V.N. (1929/2006) Marxismo e filosofia da linguagem. Tradução Michel Lahud e Yara Frateschi Vieira. 10. Ed. São Paulo: Hucitec, 196p.
BAUMAN, Z. (2005) Identidade: entrevista a Benedetto Vecchi. Rio de Janeiro: J. Zahar.
BLOMMAERT, J. (2006) Language ideology. IN: T. Todorov (Ed.) Handbook of Language and Linguistics. Vol. 6, Elsevier, p.510-523.
BOURDIEU, P. (1991) Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
BOURDIEU, P. (1977) The economics of linguistic exchanges. Social Science Information. 16.6, p.645–668.
DARVIN, R. & NORTON, B. (2016) Investment and Language Learning in the 21st Century. Language et Société, 157 (3), p. 19-38.
DE FINA, A. (2016) Linguistic practices and transnational identities. In: SIÂN PREECE (Ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Language and Identity. Routledge, p.163-178.
DUCHÊNE, A. & HELLER, M. (2012) Language in Late Capitalism: Pride and Profit. New York: Routledge.
FAIRCLOUGH, N. (2001) Discurso e mudança social. Brasília: Editora UNB.
FAIRCLOUGH, N. & WODAK, R. (2002) Análisis crítico del discurso. In: El discurso como interacción social. Estudios sobre el discurso II: una introcucción multidisciplinaria. Barcelona, Espanha: Gedisa, p. 367-404.
FLORES, N. & ROSA, J. (2015) Undoing Appropriateness: Raciolinguistic Ideologies and Language Diversity in Education. IN: Harvard Educational Review Vol. 85 No. 2.
HALE, C. (2012) Power, Position and Autonomy: Student Conflict in a Communicative Language classroom. IN: Teachers College, Columbia University Working Papers in TESOL & Applied Linguistics, Vol. 12, No. 1, Columbia University, Tokyo, p. 1-17.
HALL, S. (1992) “New Ethnicities” in ‘Race’. Culture and Difference, DONALD, J. & RATTANSI, A. (Eds.), 252-259. London, California and New Delhi: Sage Publications with the Open University.
HUNTER, J. & COOKE, D. (2007) Through autonomy to agency: Giving power to language learners. IN: Prospect Vol. 22, No. 2 2007. Access at View at http://www.ameprc.mq.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/67060/Prospect_22,_2_5_Hunter.pdf
HOBSBAWM, E. (1990). Nations and nationalism since 1780. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
LAVE, J. & WENGER, E. (1991) Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
MAKONI S. & PENNYCOOK, A. (2006) (Eds). Disinventing and Reconstructing Languages. Clevedon, Avon: Multilingual Matters.
McKINNEY, C. & NORTON, B. (2008) Identity in language and literacy education. In: B. SPOLSKY, B. & HULT, F. (eds.), The handbook of educational linguistics. Malden: Blackwell, p. 192–205.
MERCER, K. (1990) Welcome to the jungle. In: RUTHERFORD, J. (Ed.) Identity, community culture, difference. London: Lawrence and Wishhart.
MOITA LOPES. L.P. (2006) Uma linguística aplicada mestiça e ideológica: interrogando o campo como linguista aplicado. In: MOITA LOPES, L. P. (Org.). Por uma linguística aplicada Indisciplinar. São Paulo: Parábola, p. 13-43.
NICOLAIDES, C. (2017) Agency and empowerment towards the pursuit of sociocultural autonomy in language learning. In: NICOLAIDES, C. & MAGNO E SILVA, W. (Orgs.). Innovations and Challenges in Applied Linguistics and Learner Autonomy. São Paulo: Pontes Editores, p.19-41.
NORTON, B. (2000) Identity and language learning: Gender, ethnicity and educational change. Harlow, England: Longman/Pearson Education.
NORTON, B. (2012) Identity and language learning: extending the conversation. 2nd ed. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
NORTON, B. (2010) Language and Identity. In: HORNBERGER, N. & McKAY, S. (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language education. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
NORTON, B. (2013) Identity and language learning: Back to the future. TESOL Quarterly, 50 (2), 475-479.
NORTON, B. & TOOHEY, K. (2011) Identity, language learning, and social change. Language Teaching, 44, 4, 412-446. (State-of-the-Art Article).
OXFORD, R. L. (2003) Toward a more systematic model of L2 learner autonomy. In: PALFREYMAN, D. & SMITH, R.C. (Eds.) Learner Autonomy across Cultures: Language Education Perspectives. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, p. 75-91.
PAVLENKO, A. & NORTON B. (2007) Imagined Communities, Identity, and English Language Learning. In: CUMMINS J. & DAVISON C. (Eds) International Handbook of English Language Teaching. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 15. Springer, Boston, MA.
RICENTO, T. (2015) Language Policy and Political Economy: English in a Global Context. New York: Oxford University Press.
VERTOVEC, S. (2007) Super-diversity and its implications. Ethnic and Racial Studies, v.30, n.6, p.1024-1054.
VYGOTSKY, L.S. (1985) Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: The M.I.T. Press.
VYGOTSKY, L.S. (1991) A formação social da mente. São Paulo: Martins Fontes.
WEI, L. & HUA, Z. (2013) Translanguaging Identities and Ideologies: Creating Transnational Space Through Flexible Multilingual Practices Amongst Chinese University Students in the UK. Applied Linguistics 34/5. Oxford University Press, p. 516–535.
WOODWARD, K. (2002) Understanding Identity. New York: Oxford University Press.
WENGER, E. (1998) Communities of Practice. Cambridge University Press: New York, 18th printing, 2008.
Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada uses a Creative Commons (CC-BY) license, thus preserving the integrity of the articles in an open access environment. Journal authors retain the copyright of their work by licensing it under the Creative Commons Attribution license, which allows articles to be reused and distributed without restriction, as long as the original work is correctly cited.
Intellectual Property and Terms of Use
All content published in Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada, unless otherwise specified, is under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC-BY). This allows the material to be shared and adapted without restriction, as long as due credit is given and any changes made are indicated.
The authors retain the copyright to their work and take full responsibility for its content in the event of any challenge by third parties. The opinions expressed by the authors of the articles are their sole responsibility.
TLA reserves the right to make normative changes to the originals, such as changes to spelling and grammar to comply with the cultured norm of the language, as well as adjustments to form related to the editorial standard of the journal.
Downloads
