Keywords
Multiliteracies
Language ideologies
How to Cite
Abstract
Using the lens of Street (1984; [1995]2014; 2003; 2010; 2012), this article firstly aims at discussing the contemporary literacy practices young readers and writers of fanfics engage in when inserted in the affinity spaces of fan literature. This discussion is based on the concept of ideological literacy proposed by the author and dialogues with the concept of multiliteracies, outlined by the New London Group (CAZDEN; COPE et al, 1996) and expanded by several authors such as Cope; Kalantzis (2000), Gee (2000), Rojo (2012) and Kleiman; Sito (2016), among others. These contemporary literacy practices, understood, therefore, as the social use of language, were studied from an ethnographic perspective (HEATH; STREET, 2008). Data was generated from the field observation on two fanfic self-publishing platforms and from literacy events occurring in rounds of conversation, within the scope of the Junior Scientific Initiation Project. (PICJr-049), promoted by a traditional federal institution of basic education in Rio de Janeiro. The social models of literacy used by participants in literacy events (HEATH, 1982; STREET, 2012) signals that designs are (re)shaped according to the interactional context of these participants. This article also proposes a reflection on the language ideologies underlying the discourse of the students participating in the PICJr-049. This analysis is oriented by Volóchinov’s concept of ideology ([1929]2017) and the notion of language ideology, as discussed in the studies by Woolard (1998) and Kroskrity (2004). In the analysis, it was observed that the students reinforce language ideologies anchored in the legitimation of the educated norm of the Portuguese language and in the privilege of literary canons in school literacy practices.
References
BAKHTIN, M. (1979). Os gêneros do discurso. Organização, tradução, posfácio e notas de Paulo Bezerra. Notas da edição russa de Seguei Botcharov. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2016.
BARTON, D.; HAMILTON, M. (2000) Literacy practices. In Barton, D., Hamilton, M.; Ivanic, R. Situated Literacies: reading and writing in context. London: Routledge (Kindle Edition).
BAUMAN, R.; BRIGGS, C. (1990). Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 19, p. 59-88. Available in < http://www.jstor.org/stable/2155959> Accessed on 07/03/2018.
BLOMMAERT, J. (2005). Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
BLOOME, D; KALMAN, J; SEYMOR, M. (2019). Fashioning Literacy as Social David Bloome, Judy Kalman, and Matt Seymour. In: BLOOME, D; CASTANHEIRA, M. L.; LEUNG, C; ROWSELL, J. Re-theorizing literacy practices: complex social and cultural contexts. 1.ed. New York: Routledge.
CANDIDO, A. (2002). Textos de intervenção. São Paulo: Duas cidades.
CAZDEN, C.; COPE, B.; FAIRCLOUGH, N.; GEE, J.; et al. (1996). A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures. Harvard Educational Review; n. 66.1, p.60- 92.
COPE, B.; KALANTZIS, M. (eds). (2000) Multiliteracies: literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Routledge.
FABRICIO, B. F. (2015). Policing the borderland in a digital lusophone territory: the pragmatics of entextualization. In MOITA LOPES, L. P. (Org.). Global Portuguese. Linguistic ideologies in late modernity. Nova York: Routledge (Kindle Edition).
FOUCAULT, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge. Brighton, UK: Harvester.
GEE, J.P. (2008). Social linguistics and literacies: ideologies in discourses. 3ed. London: Routledge, 1990.
GEE, J.P. (2004). Situated language and learning: a critique of traditional schooling. London: Routledge.
GEE, J.P. (2000). The New Literacy Studies; from "socially situated" to the work of the social. In Barton, D., Hamilton, M. and Ivanic, R. (2000) Situated Literacies: reading and writing in context. London: Routledge.
GEE, J.P. (2000). New people in new worlds: networks, the new capitalism and schools. In: COPE, B.; KALANTZIS, M. (Ed.). Multiliteracies: literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Routledge.
GUIMARAES, T. F.; LOPES, L. P. da M. ( 2017 ). Trajetória de um texto viral em diferentes eventos comunicativos: entextualização, indexicalidade, performances identitárias e etnografia. Alfa, Rev. Linguíst. (São José do Rio Preto), São Paulo, v. 61, n. 1, p. 11-33, mar. Available in <http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=s1981-57942017000100011&lng=pt&nrm=iso>. Accessed on 07/25/ 2018.
HEATH, S.B.; STREET, B. (2008.) On ethnography: approaches to language and literacy research. New York: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
HEATH, S. B. (1982). What no bedtime story means: Narrative skills at home and school. Language in Society, 11(1), p. 49-76
HELLEKSON, K.; BUSSE, K. (Eds.). (2014). The Fan Fiction Studies Reader. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.
JENKINS, H. (1992). Textual poachers: television fans and participatory culture. Updated 20th anniversary edition. New York: Routledge, 2013.
KLEIMAN, A. B.; SITO, L. (2016) Multiletramentos, interdições e marginalidades. In: KLEIMAN, A. B.; ASSIS, J. A. (org.). (2016) Significados e ressignificações do letramento: desdobramentos de uma perspectiva sociocultural sobre a escrita. Campinas, SP : Mercado de Letras.
KRESS, G.; ROWSELL, J. (2019). Literacy as a social practice: new realities and new models. In: BLOOME, D; CASTANHEIRA, M. L.; LEUNG, C; ROWSELL, J. (2019) Re-theorizing literacy practices: complex social and cultural contexts. 1.ed. New York: Routledge.
KROSKRITY, P. V. (2004). Language ideologies. In DURANTI, A. (ed.). A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
LAJOLO, M. (2018). Literatura: ontem, hoje, amanhã. São Paulo: Editora Unesp.
LUKE, C. ( 2000). Cyber-schooling and technological change: Multiliteracies for new times. In: COPE, B.; KALANTZIS, M. (Ed.). Multiliteracies: literacy learning and the design of social futures. London: Routledge.
MAYBIN, J. ( 2000). The new literacy studies: context, intertextuality and discourse. In: Barton, D.; Hamilton, M.; Ivanic, R. Situated Literacies: reading and writing in context. London: Routledge (Kindle Edition).
NEW LONDON GROUP GRUPO DE NOVA LONDRES. (2000) A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures. In COPE, B.; KALANTZIS, M. (Ed.). (2000) Multiliteracies: literacy learning and the design of social futures. Routledge: Psychology Press, p.9-37.
ROJO, R. H. R. (2017) Entre Plataformas, ODAs e Protótipos: Novos multiletramentos em tempos de WEB2. The Especialist, v. 38, p. 1-20. Available in <https://revistas.pucsp.br/index.php/esp/article/view/32219>. Accessed on 04/16/2018.
ROJO, R. H. R. (2012) Pedagogia dos Multiletramentos: diversidade cultural e de linguagens na escola. In: ROJO, R. H. R.; MOURA, E. (Orgs.) Multiletramentos na Escola. SP: Parábola.
SILVERSTEIN, M; URBAN, G. (1996). The natural history of discourse. In: SILVERSTEIN, M; URBAN, G (Orgs.). Natural histories of discourse. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
STREET, B. (2012). Eventos de letramento e práticas de letramento: teoria e prática nos novos estudos do letramento. In: MAGALHÃES, I. Discursos e práticas de letramento: pesquisa etnográfica e formação de professores. Campinas, SP: Mercado de Letras.
STREET, B. (2003). What's "new" in New Literacy Studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice. Current Issues in Comparative Education, Vol. 5 (2), p. 77-91.
STREET, B. (1995). Letramentos sociais: abordagens críticas do letramento no desenvolvimento, na etnografia e na educação. Trad.: Marcos Bagno. São Paulo: Parábola, 2014.
STREET, B. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge: CUP.
SZUNDY, P. T. C. (2017). Language ideologies on in Brazil: conflicting positions expressed by undergraduate students. The Journal of English as a Lingua Franca, V. 6, pp 167-192.
VOLÓCHINOV, V. (1929). Marxismo e filosofia da linguagem: problemas fundamentais do método sociológico na ciência da linguagem. Tradução, notas e glossário de Sheila Grillo e Ekaterina Vólkova Américo. Ensaio introdutório de Sheila Grillo. São Paulo: Editora 34, 2017.
WOOLARD, K. A. (1998). Introduction. B. B. SCHIEFFELIN, K. A. WOOLARD, P. V.; KROSKRITY, P. V. (Eds.). (1998). Language ideologies practice and theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, v.3, n.4.
O periódico Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada utiliza a licença do Creative Commons (CC), preservando assim, a integridade dos artigos em ambiente de acesso aberto, em que:
- A publicação se reserva o direito de efetuar, nos originais, alterações de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical, com vistas a manter o padrão culto da língua, respeitando, porém, o estilo dos autores;
- Os originais não serão devolvidos aos autores;
- Os autores mantêm os direitos totais sobre seus trabalhos publicados na Trabalhos de Linguística Aplicada, ficando sua reimpressão total ou parcial, depósito ou republicação sujeita à indicação de primeira publicação na revista, por meio da licença CC-BY;
- Deve ser consignada a fonte de publicação original;
- As opiniões emitidas pelos autores dos artigos são de sua exclusiva responsabilidade.
Downloads
