Keywords
Digital communication
Everyday resistance
How to Cite
Abstract
Resistance has proven to be a hard concept to define. Debates about resistance in the sociological and sociolinguistic literature cover many aspects: from the degree to which resistance can be seen as related to established social groups (see Rampton 1996), to the level of agentivity and intention that is required for an action to be regarded as resistant, to the type of social behavior that qualifies. Thus, while some see resistance as based on actions, others see it as based on cultural appropriation (Hall and Jefferson 1976). In their comprehensive review of literature on the topic, Hollander and Einwohner (2004) conclude that resistance can be seen as consisting of action and opposition. In this paper, I analyze resistance from the point of view of opposition to ideas, social situations, institutional actions and processes that result or may result in discrimination or stereotyping of specific social groups, as negotiated in the digital sphere by migrant and non-migrant youth belonging to a school-based community. Indeed, it has been argued (Chiluwa 2012, Chibuwe & Ureke 2016) that digital environments constitute ideal arenas for the development of resistance thanks to their wide reach and their ability to mobilize people around common themes. However, much of the research in this area has targeted organized resistance fueled by political or ethnic groups. In this paper I argue that resistance is an emerging process that does not necessarily stem within political contexts or from open choice, but can develop within interactional exchanges focused on everyday life events. Thus, what I am interested in here is in how spontaneous acts and discourses of resistance emerge in the everyday exchanges of a diverse community that was not born around a particular social or political agenda. For this paper, I will examine exchanges that happen on the Facebook page of one of the members of the community. I will show how resistance takes many forms: from irony and jokes to the raising of serious topics, to the dissemination of information and through different discourse genres: from storytelling to the posting of pictures.
References
ARNAUT, K., ET AL. (eds.) (2015). Language and superdiversity. London: Routledge.
APPADURAI. A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
ALABANOVA, E & TRANDAFOIU, R. (2020). Media, migration and human rights: Discourse and resistance in the context of the erosion of liberal norms. Journal of Language and Politics n. 19, v. 3, p. 379-390.
BALABANOVA, E & TRANDAFOIU, R. (2020). Discourse and resistance in the context of the erosion of liberal norms. Journal of Language and Politics, n. 19 (3), p.379-390.
BHABA, H.K. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.
BAMBERG, M. (1997). Positioning between structure and performance. Journal of Narrative and Life History , n.7, vs.1-4, p. 335-342.
BLOMMAERT, J., & RAMPTON, B. (2011). Language and superdiversity. Diversities, v. 1, n.33. Available at: http://www.unesco.org/shs/diversities/vol13/issue2/art1. Accessed on August 19, 2020.
BUTLER, J. (2015). Notes towards a performative theory of assembly. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
CASTELLS, M. (2000). The rise of the network society. Oxford, Blackwell.
CHIBUWE, A., & UREKE, O. (2016). ‘Political gladiators’ on Facebook in Zimbabwe: A discursive analysis of intra-Zimbabwe African National Union-PF cyber wars; Baba Jukwa versus Amai Jukwa. Media, Culture and Society, v. 8, n. 38, p. 1247–1260.
DU BOIS, J. (2007). The stance triangle. In Englebretson, R. (ed.), Stancetaking in discourse, Amsterdam: John Benjamins, p. 139-82.
CHILUWA, I. (2012). Social media networks and the discourse of resistance: A sociolinguistic CDA of Biafra online discourses. Discourse & Society, v. 3, n. 23, p. 217–244
COLOMBO, F. (2019). Minori non accompagnati in Italia: Profili,politiche e leggi. Lenius, 2 August, 2019. Available at: https://www.lenius.it/minori-stranieri-non-accompagnati-in-italia/ Accessed 30 August, 2020.
CREESE, A. & BLACKLEDGE, A. (eds.) (2018). The Routledge handbook of language and superdiversity. New York: Routledge.
DAVIES, C., & HARRÉ, R. (1990). Positioning The discursive construction of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, n. 20, pp. 43-63.
dE CERTEAU, M. (1984). The Practice of Everyday Life. Translation by Steven Rendall, University of California Press, Berkeley.
DE FINA, A. (2011). Discourse and identity. In T.A. Van Dijk (ed.) Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction. London: Sage, p. 263-282.
DE FINA, A. (2013) Positioning level 3: Connecting local identity displays to macro social processes. Narrative Inquiry, v. 23, n. 1, p. 40-61(22)
DE FINA, A. (2015) Narrative and identities. In De Fina, A. and Georgakopoulou, A.(eds.), Handbook of narrative analysis. Malden, MA: Wiley, p. 369-387.
DE FINA, A., PATERNOSTRO, G. & AMORUSO, M. (2020a). Learning how to tell, learning how to ask: Reciprocity and storytelling as a sommunity process. Applied Linguistics, v. 41, n. 3, p. 352-369.
DE FINA, A., PATERNOSTRO, G. & AMORUSO, M. (2020b). Odysseus the traveler: Appropriation of a chronotopes in a community of practice. Language & Communication, v. 70, p. 71-81.
DE FINA, A., IKIZOGLU, D. & WEGNER, J. (eds.) (2017) Diversity and Superdiversity: Sociocultural Linguistic Perspectives. Washington DC : Georgetown University Press.
DEPPERMAN, A. (2013). Positioning in narrative interaction. Narrative Inquiry, v. 23, n.1, p.1-15.
ELYACHAR, J. & WINEGAR, J. (eds.) (2012). “Revolution and Counter-Revolution in Egypt a Year after January 25th.” Fieldsights—Hot Spots, Cultural Anthropology Online. Available at: http://www. culanth.org/fieldsights/208-revolution-and-counter-revolution-in-egypt-a-year-after-january25th. Accessed on 25 July, 2020.
FOUCAULT, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality. Translated by Robert Hurley New York: Random House, 1976.
FOUCAULT, M. (2007). Security, Territory, Population Lectures at the Collège de France, 1977-78. Translated by Graham Burchell. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
GIAXOGLU, K.& SPILIOTI, T. (2020). The shared story of #JeSuisAylan on Twitter: story participation and stancetaking in visual small stories. Pragmatics, v. 30, n. 2, p. 277-302.
GIUBILARO, C. (2018) (Un) framing Lampedusa: Regimes of visibility and the politics of affect in Italian media representations. In, Proglio, G. and Odasso, L. (eds.) Border Lampedusa. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, p. 103-118.
GOFFMAN, E. (1981). Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
GOODWIN, M.H. (2006). The hidden life of girls: Games of stance, status, and exclusion. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
HALL, S. AND JEFFERSON, T. (eds.) (1976). Resistance through rituals. London: Routledge.
HINE, C. (2015). Ethnography for the Internet. London: Bloomsbury.
HEYD, T. & HONKANEN, M. (2015). From Naija to Chitown: The New African Diaspora and digital representations of place. Discourse, Context & Media, v. 9, p. 14-23
HICKEL, J. (2012). Liberalism and the Politics of Occupy Wall Street. Anthropology of this Century, no. 4. Available at: http://aotcpress.com/articles/liberalism-politics-occupywall-street/ . Accessed 22 June, 2020.
HOLLANDER, J.A.& EINWOHNER, R.L. (2004). Conceptualizing Resistance. Sociological Forum, v.19, n. 4, p. 533-554.
IDLE, N. & NUNNS, A. (eds.) (2011) Tweets from Tahrir: Egypt’s revolution as it unfolded in the words of the people who made it. New York: Or Books
JACQUEMET, M. (2019). Beyond the speech community: On belonging to a multilingual, diasporic, and digital social network. Language & Communication, n. 68, p. 45-56
JAFFE, A. (ed.) (2009). Stance: Sociolinguistic perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
LAZAR, M. (2017). Homonationalist discourse as a politics of pragmatic resistance in Singapore's Pink Dot movement: Towards a southern praxis. Journal of Sociolinguistics, v. 21, n.3, p.420-441
LI, WEI (2018). Translanguaging as a practical theory of language. Applied Linguistics, v., 00, n.0, 1–23.
MARTIN ROJO, L. (2014). Occupy: The spatial dynamics of discourse in global protest movements. Journal of language and politics, v.13, n. 4, p.583-598.
MERRIAM/WEBSTER DICTIONARY. Available at: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/resistance. Accessed 10 August, 2020.
MINISTERO DEL LAVORO E DELLE POLITICHE SOCIALI (2018) Report Mensile Minori Stranieri Non Accompagnati (Msna) in Italia Dati al 28 febbraio 2018.Available from https://www.lavoro.gov.it/temi-e-priorita/immigrazione/focus-on/minori-stranieri/Documents/Report-MSNA-mese-febbraio-2018-29032018.pdf, retrieved 31 August, 2020.
MPOFU, P. (2018). Linguistic disenfranchisement, minority resistance and language revitalisation: The contributions of ethnolinguistic online communities in Zimbabwe. Cogent Arts & Humanities, v. 5, n.1. Available from https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311983.2018.1551764
PAPADOPOULOS, D. & TSIANOS, V.S. (2013). After citizenship: autonomy of migration, organisational ontology and mobile commons. Citizenship Studies, v. 17, n. 2, p. 178-196.
PENNYCOOK, A. & OTSUJI, E. (2018). Metrolingualism. Abingdon: Routledge.
RAMPTON, B. (1996) Youth, race, and resistance: A sociolinguistic perspective. Linguistics and Education, v.8, n.2, p. 159-173.
RAZSA, M. & KURNIK, A. (2012). The Occupy Movement in Žižek’s Hometown: Direct Democracy and a Politics of Becoming. American Ethnologist, v. 39, n.2, p. 238-258.
SELONI, L. & SARFATI, Y. (2017). Linguistic landscape of Gezi Park protests in Turkey: A discourse analysis of graffiti. Journal of Language and Politics, v. 16, n. 6, p.782-808.
SINATORA, F. L. (2019). Language, Identity, and Syrian Political Activism on Social Media. New York: Routledge.
THEODOSSOPOULOS, D. (2013). Infuriated with the infuriated? Blaming tactics and discontent about the Greek financial crisis. Current Anthropology, v. 54, n. 2, p. 200-221.
URLA, J. AND HELEPOLOLEI, J. (2014). The ethnography of resistance then and now. History and Anthropology v. 25, p. 431-451.
VERTOVEC, S. (2007). Super-diversity and its implications, Ethnic and Racial Studies, v. 30, n.6, 1024-1054.
VITAK, J. (2012). The impact of context collapse and privacy on social network site disclosures. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, v. 56, n. 4, p. 451-470.
ZHU HUA, LI WEI & LYONS, A. (2017). Polish shop(ping) as translanguaging space. Social Semiotics, v.27, n.4, 411-433.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2021 Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada
Downloads
