Banner Portal
“Myths”, “truths” and the role of Applied Linguistics in contemporary society
PDF

Keywords

Post-modern
Post-truth
Narrative analysis
Epistemology
Meta-narratives

How to Cite

ORTON, Naomi. “Myths”, “truths” and the role of Applied Linguistics in contemporary society. Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada, Campinas, SP, v. 60, n. 2, p. 455–466, 2021. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/tla/article/view/8664375. Acesso em: 18 jul. 2024.

Abstract

This paper takes a critical look at what the phenomenon of so-called “post-truth” discourse means for the epistemological foundations of research in Applied Linguistics, particularly studies grounded in what has been termed a “postmodern” view of social life. Based on a perspective of narrative as performance, I propose that research dissemination may be viewed as metanarrative practice and that the validity and robustness of knowledge are thus built during narrative events, junctures at which these metanarratives are interrogated by peers, research participants, editors and so forth. Moreover, I argue that resonant narratives (both those told by research participants and the meta-narratives subsequently woven together by scholars) may be pivotal in bridging the gap between the alleged poles of emotion and reason in order to advance the social issues at the heart of Applied Linguistics ‒ issues which may be side-lined or discredited by what has been deemed post-truth discourse. In line with the Latourian concept of networks ‒ as fundamental in shaping the construction of knowledge ‒ I further suggest that the relations of power with which these are intertwined still require considerable interrogation in order for such narratives to reach a wider audience and potentially engender social transformation.

PDF

References

ARAÚJO, E. P. (in press). Cada luto, uma luta: narrativas, interação e resistência de mães contra a violência policial. Tese de Doutorado em Estudos da Linguagem. Departamento de Letras, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro.

ARAÚJO, E. P.; BIAR, L.; BASTOS, L. C. (2021). Engagement in Social Movements and the Fight for Justice: A Study on the Narratives of Black Mothers. Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada. v. 59, n. 3. p. 1688-1709.

AUSTIN, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

BAKHTIN. M. (1979). Estética da Criação Verbal. Translation by Maria Galvão Pereira. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1997.

BAUMAN, R. (1977). Verbal art as performance. Illinois: Waveland Press.

BAUMAN, R. (1986). Story, performance and event: contextual studies of oral narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

BAUMAN, R.; BRIGGS, C. L. (1990). Poetics and Performance as Critical Perspectives on Language and Social Life. Annual Review of Anthropology. v. 19, n. 1, p. 59-88.

BLOMMAERT, J. (2020). Political Discourse in Post-digital Societies. Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada. v. 59, n. 1, p. 390-403.

BORGES, T. R. S. (2017). Pelo amadurecimento de um “sentir crítico”. Veredas, Revista de Estudos Linguísticos. v. 21, n. 2, p. 8-23.

BOURDIEU, P. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Translation by Richard Nice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1987.

BROWSE, S.; HATAVARA, M. (2019). “I can tell the difference between fiction and reality”: Cross-fictionality and Mind-style in political rhetoric. Narrative Inquiry. v. 29, n. 2, p. 333-351.

BRUNER, J. (1990). Acts of meaning: four lectures on mind and culture. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

BUCHOLTZ, M.; HALL, K. (2004). Language and Identity. In: Duranti, A. (ed.), A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, p.369-394.

BUCHOLTZ, M.; HALL, K. (2005). Identity and Interaction: A Sociocultural Linguistic Approach. Discourse Studies, v. 7, n. 4-5, p. 585-614.

CLIFFORD, J. (1986). Partial truths. In: Clifford, J.; Marcus, G. (orgs.). Writing Culture: the poetics and the politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press, p.1-26.

CLIFFORD, J.; MARCUS, G. (1986). Writing Culture: the poetics and the politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.

COELHO, M. C. (2019). Emotions and intellectual work. Horizontes Antropológicos. v. 25, n. 54, p. 273-297.

D’ANCONA, M. (2017). Post-truth. The new war on truth and how to fight back. Ebury Press.

DE FINA, A. (2021). Doing narrative analysis from a narratives-as-practices perspective. Narrative Inquiry. v. 31, n. 1, p. 49-71.

DE FINA, A.; GEORGAKOPOULOU, A. (2008). Introduction: Narrative Analysis in the shift from texts to practices. Text & Talk. v. 23, n. 1, p. 40-61.

DUNKER, C. (2018). Subjetividade em tempos de pós-verdade. In: Dunker, C.; Tezza, C.; Fuks, J.; Tiburi, M.; Safatle, V. Ética e pós-verdade. Porto Alegre: Dublinense, p. 9-41.

EVANS, A. (2017). The myth gap: what happens when evidence and arguments aren’t enough? Transworld.

FABRÍCIO, B. F. (2006). Linguística Aplicada como espaço de “desaprendizaegm”: redescrições em curso. In: Moita Lopes, L. P (org.), Por uma Linguística Aplicada Indisciplinar. São Paulo: Parábola. p.45-65.

FOUCAULT, M. (1969). The Archaeology of Knowledge. Translation by Alan Sheridan. New York: Pantheon Books, 1972.

GEE, J. P. (1999). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method. New York: Routledge.

GERGEN, M. & GERGEN, K. (2006). Narratives in action. Narrative Inquiry. v. 16, n. 1, p. 112-121.

GEORGAKOPOULOU. A. (2006). Thinking big with small stories in narrative and identity analysis. Narrative Inquiry. v. 16, n. 1, p. 122-130.

GOFFMAN, E. (1956). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. University of Edinburgh Social Sciences Research Centre, Monograph No.2.

GOFFMAN, E. (1977). The Arrangement between the sexes. Theory and Society. v. 4, n. 3, p. 301-331.

GOFFMAN, E. (1979). Gender Advertisements. New York: Harper & Row.

GOFFMAN, E. (1983). The Interaction Order: American Sociological Association, 1982 Presidential Address. American Sociological Review. v. 48, n. 1, p. 1-17.

HATAVARA, M. & MILDORF, J. (2017). Fictionality, narrative modes and vicarious storytelling. Style. v. 51, n. 3, p. 392-408.

JÄRVINEN, M. (2003). Life histories and the perspective of the present. Narrative Inquiry. v. 14, n. 1, p. 45-68.

KACHRU, B. (1982). Models for Non-Native Teachers. In: Kachru, B. (ed.), The Other Tongue. English Across Cultures. Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 2nd ed., p.48-74.

KRAATILA, E. (2019). Conspicuous fabrications: Speculative fiction as a tool for confronting post-truth discourse. Narrative Inquiry. v. 29, n. 2, p. 418-433.

LABOV, W. (1972). The transformation of experience in narrative syntax. In: Labov, W. (ed.), Language in the inner city. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press, p.354-396.

LABOV, W.; WALETSKY, J. (1967). Narrative Analysis: oral versions of personal experience. In: Helm, J. (org.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts. Seattle: University of Washington Press, p.12-44.

LANGELLIER, K. M. (2001). “You’re marked”: breast cancer, tattoo and the narrative performance of identity. In: Brockmeier, J.; Carbaugh, D. (orgs.), Narrative and Identity. Studies in autobiography, self and culture. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, p. 145-184.

LATOUR, B. (1989). Clothing truth. In: Lawson, H.; Appignanesi, L. (eds.), Dismantling Truth: Reality in the Post-Modern World. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, p.101-126.

LATOUR, B. (1999). Pandora's hope: essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

LATOUR, B. (2018). Down to earth: Politics in the New Climatic Regime. Cambridge: Polity Press.

LAZARUS, J. V.; RATZAN, S. C.; PALAYEW, A. et al. (2020). A global survey of potential acceptance of a COVID-19 vaccine. Nature Medicine. v. 27, p. 225-228.

LINDE, C. (1993). Life Stories: the creation of coherence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

LYOTARD, J. (1979). The postmodern condition. Translation by Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1984.

MASON, J. (2019). Making fiction out of fact: Attention and belief in the discourse of conspiracy. Narrative Inquiry. v. 29, n. 2, p. 293-312.

MCINTYRE, L. (2018). Post-truth. Cambridge: MIT Press.

MISHLER, E. (1990). Validation in inquiry-guided research: The role of exemplars in narrative studies. Harvard Educational Review, v. 60, n. 4, p. 415-442.

MISHLER, E. (2006). Narrative and Identity: the double arrow of time. In: De Fina, A.; Schiffrin, D.; Bamberg, M. (eds.), Studies in interactional sociolinguistics: v.23. Discourse and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 30–47.

MIYAZAKI, H. (2004). The Method of Hope: Anthropology, Philosophy and Fijian Knowledge. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

MOITA LOPES, L.P. (2001). Práticas narrativas como espaço de construção das identidades sociais: uma abordagem socioconstructionista. In: Ribeiro, B. T.; Lima, C.; Dantas, M. T. (eds.), Narrativa, identidade e clínica. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto de Psiquiatria da Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, p.55-72.

MOONEY, C. (2011). Once and For All: Climate Denial Is Not Postmodern. www.desmogblog.com. Available at: https://www.desmog.com/2011/02/28/once-and-all-climate-denial-not-postmodern/. Retrieved on 4th May 2021.

NURMINEN, M. (2019). Narrative warfare: the “careless” reinterpretation of literary canon in online antifeminism. Narrative Inquiry. v. 29, n. 2, p. 313-332.

PHILLIPSON, R. (1992). Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

RIESSMAN, C. K. (1993). Narrative Analysis. Newbury Park: Sage.

ROBERTS, S. (2020). Fireworks, Flags and Signs: Voices from the streets of post-Brexit Britain. Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada. v. 59, n. 1, p. 491-506.

SCHOOFS, K. & VAN DE MIEROOP, D. (2019). Adjusting to new “truths”: The relation between the spatio-temporal context and identity work in repeated WWII-testimonies. Narrative Inquiry. v. 19, n. 2, p. 268-292.

SCHRIFFIN, D. (1984). How a story says what it means and does. Text & Talk, v. 4 n. 4, p. 313-346.

SANTOS, B. S. (2007). Renovar a teoria crítica e reinventar a emancipação social. São Paulo: Boitempo.

SCRUTON, R. (2015). Fools, Frauds and Firebrands: Thinkers of the New Left. London: Bloomsbury.

SILVA, D. N. (2020). The Pragmatics of Chaos: parsing Bolsonaro’s undemocratic language. Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada. v. 59, n. 1, p. 507-537.

YOUNG, K. G. (1987). Taleworlds and storyrealms: The phenomenology of narrative. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.