Keywords
Talk-in-interaction
Conversation analysis
How to Cite
Abstract
Faced with the myriad of psychotherapeutic interventional models focused mainly on the treatment of psychopathologies, we experience theoretical and methodological reductionism in qualifying psychotherapy in terms of its microsocial internal aspects. Based on the understanding that we should observe social and relational aspects of such interventions, the objective of this research was to describe and analyze interactional practices that emerge in language use in a psychotherapeutic interaction in a private clinic in southern Brazil. We use ethnomethodological Conversation Analysis as theoretical and methodological framework. The results point to the importance of analyzing interactants’ epistemic stances negotiation, as well as the institutional agenda, as impact issues in clinical interventions. We highlight the use of interactional practices as interactants’ movements to coordinate social actions within the clinical setting.
References
ALBERTI, M.; KRÜGER, W. M.; ALMEIDA, A. DO N.; STENZEL, L. M. (2021). Análise microetnográfica da (co)produção da transexualidade em um atendimento clínico. Psicologia & Sociedade [online]. v. 33, e228146.
ANTAKI, C. (2008). Formulations in Psychotherapy. In: PERÄKYLÄ, A.; ANTAKI, C.; VEHVILÄINEN, S.; LEUDAR, I. (2008). Conversation analysis and psychotherapy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 26-42.
ASSOCIAÇÃO BRASILEIRA DE PSIQUIATRIA. (2019). Nota de Esclarecimento: o exercício da psicoterapia pelo médico. Disponível em: https://d494f813-3c95-463a-898c-ea1519530871.filesusr.com/ugd/26b667_1205460ab9b441ce99a12c835614a876.pdf / Acesso em: 10 set. 2020.
BAVELAS, J.; GERWING J.; HEALING, S. (2014). Hand and Facial Gestures in Conversation Interaction. In: HOLTGRAVES, T. The Oxford Handbook of Language and Social Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 111-30.
BERCELLI, F.; ROSSANO, F.; VIARO, M. (2008). Clients' responses to therapists' reinterpretations. In: PERÄKYLÄ, A.; ANTAKI, C.; VEHVILÄINEN, S.; LEUDAR, I. (2008). Conversation analysis and psychotherapy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 43-61.
BIGGERSTAFF, D. (2012). Qualitative Research Methods in Psychology. In: ROSSI G (ed.). Psychology - Selected Papers. Rijeka: InTech, p. 175-206
BORBA, R. (2014). Sobre os obstáculos discursivos para a atenção integral e humanizada à saúde de pessoas transexuais. Sex., Salud Soc. (Rio J.), n. 17, p. 66-97.
BORBA, R. (2015). How an individual becomes a subject: Discourse, interaction & subjectification at a Brazilian gender identity clinic. W.P. Urban Language and Literacies, n. 163, p. 02-23.
BORBA, R. (2019). The interactional making of a “true transsexual”: Language and (dis)identification in trans-specific healthcare. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, n. 256, p. 21-55.
CERIONI, R. A. N.; HERZBERG, E. (2016). Expectativas de Pacientes acerca do Atendimento Psicológico em um Serviço-Escola: da Escuta à Adesão. Psicol. cienc. prof., v. 36, n. 3, p. 597-609.
CZERESNIA, D. (2003). The concept of health and the difference between prevention and promotion. Cad. Saúde Pública, n. 15, p. 701-9.
DAVIS, K. (1986). The process of problem (re)formulation in psychotherapy. Sociol. Health Illness, v. 8, 44–74.
DEPPERMANN, A. (2005). Conversational interpretation of lexical items and conversational contrasting. In: HAKULINEN, A.; SELTING, M. (eds.). Syntax and lexis in conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins, p. 289-317.
DEPPERMANN, A. (2011). The Study of Formulations as a Key to an Interactional Semantics. Human Studies, v. 34, p. 115-28.
DREW, P. (1992). Contested evidence in courtroom cross-examination: The case of a trial for rape. In: DREW, P.; HERITAGE, J. (eds.). Talk at work. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 270-320.
ERICKSON, F. (2014). Talk and Social Theory. Ecologies of speaking and listening in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge Polity Press.
FOX, B. (2001). Evidentiality: Authority, Responsibility, and Entitlement in English Conversation. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, v. 11, n. 2, p. 167-92.
GARCEZ, P.M.; BULLA, G.S.; LODER, L.L. (2014). Práticas de pesquisa microetnográfica: geração, segmentação e transcrição de dados audiovisuais como procedimentos analíticos plenos. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Linguística Teórica e Aplicada, v. 30, n. 2, p. 257-88.
GARFINKEL, H.; SACKS, H. (1970). On formal structures of practical actions. In: J. D. MCKINNEY; E. A. TIRYAKIAN (Eds.). Theoretical sociology. New York, Appleton-Century Crofts, p. 337–366.
GERGEN, K. (2009). Relational Being: Beyond Self and Community. Oxford: Blackwell.
GOFFMAN, E. (1981). Footing. In: GOFFMAN, E. Forms of Talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, p. 124-57.
HAKULINEN, A. (2001). Minimal and non-minimal answers to Yes-No questions. Pragmatics, v. 1, p. 1-15.
HEPBURN, A; BOLDEN, G.B. (2013). The Conversation Analytic Approach to Transcription. In: SIDNELL, J; STIVERS, T (orgs.). The Handbook of Conversation Analysis. Oxford: Blackwell, p. 57–76.
HERITAGE, J. (1984). A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of Its Sequential Placement. In: ATKINSON, J.M.; HERITAGE, J. (eds.). Structures of Social Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p. 299-345.
HERITAGE, J. (2010). Questioning in medicine. In: FREED, A.; EHRLICH, S. (eds.). Why do you ask? The function of questions in institutional discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 42-62.
HERITAGE, J. (2012). The epistemic engine: sequence organization and territories of knowledge. Research on Language and Social Interaction, v. 45, n. 1, p. 30–52.
HERITAGE, J. (2018). The ubiquity of epistemics: A rebuttal to the ‘epistemics of epistemics’ group. Discourse Studies, v. 20, n. 1, p. 14-56.
HERITAGE, J; RAYMOND G. (2005). The terms of agreement: Indexing epistemic authority and subordination in talk-in-interaction. Social Psychology Quarterly, v. 68, n. 1, p. 15–38.
HERITAGE, J.; ROTH A.L. (1995). Grammar and Institution: Questions and Questioning in the Broadcast News Interview. Research on Language and Social Interaction, n. 28, p. 1-60.
HERITAGE, J., WATSON R. (1979). Formulations as conversational objects. In: PSATHAS, G. (ed.). Everyday language. New York: Irvington Press, p. 123-62.
JEFFERSON, G. (1978). Sequential Aspects of Storytelling in Conversation. In: SCHENKEIN, J. (ed.). Studies in the Organization of Conversational Interaction. New York: Academic Press Inc., p. 219-240.
KNOL, A. S. L; HUISKES, M.; KOOLE, T.; MEGANCK, R.; LOEYS, T.; DESMET, M. (2021). Reformulating and Mirroring in Psychotherapy: A Conversation Analytic Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, v. 11, n. 318, p. 1-12.
LEVINSON, S. C. (1988). Putting Linguistics on a Proper Footing: Explorations in Goffman’s Concepts of Participation. In: DREW, P.; WOOTTON, A (eds.). Erving Goffman. Exploring the Interactional Order. Cambridge, Polity Press, pp. 161-227.
LODER, L.L.; JUNG, N.M. (2008). Fala-em-interação Social: Introdução à Análise da Conversa Etnometodológica. Campinas: Mercado de Letras.
MACKINNON, R. A.; MICHELS, R; BUCKLEY, P. J. (2016). General Principles of Interview. In: MACKINNON, R. A.; MICHELS, R; BUCKLEY, P. J. The Psychiatric Interview in Clinical Practice (3rd ed.). Arlington: American Psychiatric Association Publishing, p. 3-76.
MARICCHIOLO, F., BONAIUTO, M., GNISCI, A. (2005). Hand gestures in speech: Studies of their roles in social interaction. In: 2nd Conference of the International Society for Gesture Studies. Proceedings. Disponível em: http://gesture-lyon2005.ens-lyon.fr/article.php3?id_article=241
OSTERMANN, A.C.; SOUZA, J. (2009). Contribuições da Análise da Conversa para os estudos sobre o cuidado em saúde: reflexões a partir das atribuições feitas por pacientes. Cad. Saúde Pública, v. 25, n. 7, p. 1521-33.
OSTERMANN, A.C; ANDRADE, D.N.P.; SILVA, J. (2013). Análise da Conversa Aplicada em interações entre médicos e pacientes. Veredas Revista de Estudos Linguísticos, n. 17, p. 114-35.
OSTERMANN, A.C.; ANDRADE, D.N.P.; FREZZA; M. (2016). A prosódia como componente de formação e de atribuição de sentido a ações na fala-em-interação: o caso de formulações no tribunal. DELTA: Documentação de Estudos em Linguística Teórica e Aplicada, v. 32, n. 2, p. 481-513.
PERÄKYLÄ, A. (2012). Conversation analysis in psychotherapy. In: STIVERS, T.; SIDNELL, J. (eds.). Handbook of conversation analysis. Chichester: Blackwell, p. 551-74.
PERÄKYLÄ, A.; ANTAKI, C.; VEHVILÄINEN, S.; LEUDAR, I. (2008). Conversation analysis and psychotherapy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
POTTER, J. (1996). Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric and Social Construction. London: SAGE Publications.
RAYMOND, G. (2003). Grammar and Social Organization: Yes/No Interrogatives and the Structure of Responding. American Sociological Review, v. 68, n. 6, p. 939-67.
ROBINSON, J.; TATE, A.; HERITAGE, J. (2016). Agenda-setting revisited: When and how do primary-care physicians solicit patients’ additional concerns?. Patient Education and Counseling, v. 99, p.718-23.
SACKS, H. (1992). Lectures in Conversation: vol. I & II. Oxford: Blackwell.
SCHEGLOFF, E. A. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In: SUDNOW, D. (Ed.). Studies in social interaction. New York: Free Press, p. 75–119.
SCHEGLOFF, E. A. (1988). Goffman and the Analysis of Conversation. In: DREW, P.; WOOTTON, A (eds.). Erving Goffman. Exploring the Interactional Order. Cambridge: Cambridge Polity Press, p. 89-135.
SCHEGLOFF, E. A. (1996). Confirming Allusions: Toward an Empirical Account of Action. AJS, v. 102, n. 1, p. 161-216.
SCHEGLOFF, E. A. (2002). Accounts of conduct in interaction: interruption, overlap, and turn-taking. In: TURNER, J. P. (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory. New York: Kluwer Academic / Plenum Publishers, p. 287-321.
SOUZA; J.; OSTERMANN, A.C. (2016). Por que se explicar? A normalidade construída por meio da linguagem no consultório oncológico. Gragoatá, n. 40, p. 399-422.
STEVANOVIC, M.; PERÄKYLÄ, A. (2012). Deontic Authority in Interaction: The Right to Announce, Propose, and Decide. Research on Language & Social Interaction, v. 45, n. 3, p. 297-321.
SZASZ, T. (1994). El mito de la enfermidad mental. Buenos Aires: Amorrortu Editores.
VOUTILAINEN, L.; PERÄKYLÄ, A. (2016). Interactional Practices of Psychotherapy. In: O’RILLEY, M.; LESTER, J.N. (eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Adult Mental Health: Discourse and Conversational Studies. London: Palgrave Macmillan, p. 540-77.
WEISTE, E.; VOUTILAINEN, L.; PERÄKYLÄ, A. (2016). Epistemic asymmetries in psychotherapy interaction: therapists’ practices for displaying access to clients’ inner experiences. Sociology of Health and Illness, v. 38, n. 4, p.645-61.
WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION (WHO). (2016). ICD-10: International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems [online]. Disponível em: https://icd.who.int/browse10/2016/en / Acesso em: 14 set 2019.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada
Downloads
