Banner Portal
Tasks for learning teachers who teach mathematics in the elementary school
PORTUGUÊS (Português (Brasil))
INGLÊS (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Continuous education
Algebraic thinking
Equals sign
Mathematical and didactical knowledge

How to Cite

BARBOZA, Lilian Cristina de Souza; PAZUCH, Vinícius; RIBEIRO, Alessandro Jacques. Tasks for learning teachers who teach mathematics in the elementary school. Zetetike, Campinas, SP, v. 29, n. 00, p. e021009, 2021. DOI: 10.20396/zet.v29i00.8656716. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/zetetike/article/view/8656716. Acesso em: 17 jul. 2024.

Abstract

Using tasks for teacher learning is a fundamentally topic for research in teacher education. Thus, this paper aims to understand and explain how the construction of mathematical and didactical knowledge of teachers who teach mathematics at elementary school, in a formative process, on the different meanings of the equals sign, occurs. The research is qualitative-interpretative and data, documentary and audio records, come from a teacher education process developed with 6 teachers from a public school in São Paulo. Analyzes showed mobilization of mathematical and didactical knowledge, which was reorganized, developed and constructed, by the teachers through getting involved in this collective formative process of planning, developing and reflecting a mathematics lesson on the different meanings of equals sign. It is understood that such movements occurred through the use of professional learning tasks and the mediations and the teacher educator.

https://doi.org/10.20396/zet.v29i00.8656716
PORTUGUÊS (Português (Brasil))
INGLÊS (Português (Brasil))

References

Ball, D. L.; Ben-Peretz, M., & Cohen, R. B. (2014). Records of practice and the development of collective professional knowledge. British Journal of Educational Studies, 62(3), 317-335.

Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In G. Sykes & L. Darling-Hammond (Org.), Teaching as the learning profession: Handbook of policy and practice (pp. 3-32). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content Knowledge for Teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, Thousand Oaks, 59, 389-407.

Barboza, L. C. S. (2019). Conhecimento dos professores dos anos iniciais e o sinal de igualdade: Uma investigação com tarefas de aprendizagem profissional. Dissertação de Mestrado em Ensino e História das Ciências e da Matemática. Santo André: Universidade Federal do ABC, Brasil.

Barboza, L. C. S., Ribeiro, A. J., & Pazuch, V. (2019). Aprendizagem profissional de professores dos anos iniciais: Explorando os diferentes significados do sinal de igualdade. Acta Scientiae, 22(4), 71-97.

Behr, M., Erlwanger, S., & Nichols, E. (1980). How children view the equal sign. Mathematics Teaching, 92, 13-18.

Blanton, M., & Kaput, J. (2005). Characterizing a classroom practice that promotes algebraic reasoning. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(5), p. 412-446.

Blanton, M., & Kaput, J. (2008). Building disctrict capacity for teacher development in algebraic reasoning. In J. Kaput, D. Carraher & M. Blanton (Org.), Algebra in the Early Grades (pp. 133-160). Nova Iorque: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Brasil. (2017). Base Nacional Comum Curricular: Matemática. Brasília: MEC/SFE.

Britt, M. S., & Irwin, K. C. (13 out. 2011). Algebraic thinking with and without algebraic representation: a three-year longitudinal study. ZDM, 40(1), p. 39-53.

D´Ambrósio, U. (2004). Prefácio. In: M. C. Borba & J. L. Araújo (Org.), Pesquisa Qualitativa em Educação Matemática, (pp. 11-23). Belo Horizonte: Autêntica.

Esteban, M. P. S. (2010). Pesquisa qualitativa em Educação: Fundamentos e tradições. (19. ed.). Porto Alegre: AMGH. Tradução de Miguel Cabrera.

Kieran, C. (1981). Concepts associated with the equality symbol. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 12, 317-326.

Kieran, C. et al. (2016). Early Algebra Research into its Nature, its Learning, its Teaching. Hamburg: Springer International Publishing.

MA, L. (1999). Saber e ensinar: Matemática Elementar. Lisboa: Gradiva.

O'donnell B., & Taylor, A. (2007). A lesson plan as professional development? You’ve got be kidding. Teaching Children Mathematics, p. 272-278.

Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011, september). Conceptualizing Teacher Professional Learning. Review Of Educational Research, 81(3), 376-407.

Ponte, J. P. (2005). Gestão curricular em Matemática. In: GTI (Ed.). O professor e o desenvolvimento curricular (pp. 11-34). Lisboa: APM.

Ponte, J. P., Branco, N., & Matos A. (2009). A Álgebra no ensino básico. Ministério da Educação, DGIDC, Lisboa.

Ponte, J. P., Branco, N., Quaresma, M., Velez, I., & Mata-Pereira, J. (2008). Perspectivas teóricas no estudo das práticas profissionais dos professores de matemática. In: Seminário de Investigação em Educação Matemática (pp. 267-279). Lisboa: SIEM.

Ponte, J. P., Oliveira, N., & Matos A. (2002). Remar contra a maré: A construção do conhecimento e da identidade profissional na formação inicial. Revista de Educação, 2(11), 145 -163.

Ponte, J. P., Brocardo, J., & Oliveira, H. (2003). Investigações matemáticas na sala de aula. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica.

Ponte, J. P., & Quaresma, M. (2016). Teachers’ professional practice conducting mathematical discussions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, Springer Nature, 93(1), 51-66.

Ribeiro, A. J., & Cury, H. N. (2015). Álgebra para a formação do professor. Belo Horizonte: Autêntica.

Ribeiro, A. J., & Ponte, J. P. (2019). Professional Learning Opportunities in a Practice-Based Teacher Education Programme about the Concept of Function. Acta Scientiae, 21(2), 49-74.

Ribeiro, A. J., & Ponte, J. P. da. (2020). Um modelo teórico para organizar e compreender as oportunidades de aprendizagem de professores para ensinar matemática. Zetetike, 28, e020027. https://doi.org/10.20396/zet.v28i0.8659072

Russ, R. S.; Sherin, B. L., & Sherin, M. G. (2016). What constitutes teacher learning? In D. H. Gitomer & C. A. Bell (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (pp. 391-438). Whashington, DC: American Educational Research.

São Paulo (Cidade). (2017). Currículo da Cidade: ensino fundamental – matemática. São Paulo: SME/Secretaria Municipal de Educação, PMSP.

Serrazina, M. L. (2013). O programa de formação contínua em matemática para professores do 1º ciclo e a melhoria do ensino da matemática. Da Investigação às Práticas, 3(2), 75-97.

Serrazina, M. L. (2017). Planificação do ensino-aprendizagem da Matemática. In GTI (Ed.). A prática dos professores: planificação e discussão coletiva na sala de aula (pp. 9-32). Lisboa: APM.

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, Thousand Oaks, 15(2), 4-14.

Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, (57), 1-22.

Silver, E. A., Clark, L. M., Ghousseini, H. N., Charalambous, C. Y., & Sealy, J. T. (2007). Where is the mathematics? Examining teachers’ mathematical learning opportunities in practice-based professional learning tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, Springer Netherlands, 10(4), 261-277.

Smith, M. S. (2001). Practice-based professional development for teachers of mathematics. Virgínia: NCTM.

Stacey, K. E., & Macgregor, M. (1997). Ideas about symbolism that students bring to algebra. The Mathematics Teacher, 90(2), 110-113.

Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Five practices for helping teachers move beyond show and tell. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 313-340.

Trivilin, L. R., & Ribeiro, A. J. (2015). Conhecimento matemático para o ensino de diferentes significados do sinal de igualdade: um estudo desenvolvido com professores dos anos iniciais do ensino fundamental. Bolema, 29(51), 38-59.

Webster-Wright, A. (2009). Reframing professional development through understanding authentic professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 702-739.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2021 Zetetiké

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.