Keywords
Purpose of concepts
Probabilistic thinking
Dynamic animations
How to Cite
Abstract
Probability is and will continue to be a virtual concept. This specificity requires meta strategies that go far beyond the instruction of the mathematical details and ask for a sensible use of simulation. We suggest focussing teaching efforts on explicitly exposing the students to the purpose of the concept of probability. The purpose shows the character of probability indirectly as the required steps for solving a task make the properties appear natural in the context. We elaborate suitable tasks and interactive animations, which are designed to overcome learning obstacles. We focus on three aspects of probability: The character of probabilistic statements, the transparent use of probability for decisions under risk, and informal inference considerations in the early probability education. An essential criterion of teaching is how far it allows learners a more direct access to the concepts on an intuitive level. For designing didactic animations, our principles are characterised by the following ideas: A dynamic change is explored in comparison to the initial situation. Like watching a video, one looks at the different stages of emergence of a relation between the investigated concepts.
References
Batanero, C. & Borovcnik, M. (2016). Statistics and probability in high school. Rotterdam: Sense.
Batanero, C., Chernoff, E., Engel, J. Lee, H., & Sánchez, E. (2016). Research on teaching and learning probability. ICME-13 Topical Surveys. Cham, Switzerland: Springer online. Online: doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31625-3_1.
Batanero, C., Henry, M., & Parzysz, B. (2005). The nature of chance and probability. In: A. G. Jones (Ed.), Exploring probability in school (pp. 15-37). New York: Springer.
Bennett, D. J. (1999). Randomness. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bohr, N. (1934/1927): Atomic theory and the description of nature. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press (containing the Como lecture of 1927).
Borovcnik, M. (1992). Stochastik im Wechselspiel von Intuitionen und Mathematik (Stochastics in the interplay between intuitions and mathematics). Mannheim: Bibliographisches Institut.
Borovcnik, M. (2015a). Central theorems of probability theory and their impact on probabilistic intuitions. In J. M. Contreras, et al. (Eds.), Didáctica de la Estadística, Probabilidad y Combinatoria, 2 (pp. 15-35). Granada, Universidad de Granada.
Borovcnik, M. (2015b). Risk and decision making: The “logic” of probability. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 12(1, 2 & 3), 113-139.
Borovcnik, M. (2016). Probabilistic thinking and probability literacy in the context of risk. Educação Matemática Pesquisa, 18(3), 1491-1516.
Borovcnik, M. (2019a). Inferência informal e inferência “informal”. Educação Matemática Pesquisa, 21(1), 433-460. Online: dx.doi.org/10.23925/1983-3156.2019v21i1p433-460.
Borovcnik, M. (2019b). Conceptos fundamentales y sus propiedades clave en probabilidad – Cómo identificarlos y proporcionar intuiciones que los sostengan. Revista Eletrônica de Educação Matemática (REVEMAT), 14, Educação Estatística, 1-25.
Borovcnik, M., & Bentz, H. J. (1990, 2003). Intuitive Vorstellungen von Wahrscheinlichkeitskonzepten: Fragebögen und Tiefeninterviews (Intuitive conceptions of probabilistic concepts: Questionnaire and in-depth interviews). Technical Reports. Klagenfurt University.
Borovcnik, M., & Bentz, H. J. (1991). Empirical research in understanding probability. In R. Kapadia, & M. Borovcnik (Eds.), Chance encounters. Mathematics education library vol 12 (pp. 73-106). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Borovcnik, M., & Kapadia, R. (2014). A historical and philosophical perspective on probability. In E. J. Chernoff & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Probabilistic thinking: Presenting plural perspectives (pp. 7-34). New York: Springer.
Borovcnik, M., Peard, R. (1996). Probability. In A. Bishop, et al. (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 239-288). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Carranza, P. & Kuzniak, A. (2008). Duality of probability and statistics teaching in French education. In C. Batanero, G. Burrill, C. Reading, & A. Rossman (Eds.), Joint ICMI/IASE Study: Teaching Statistics in School Mathematics. Challenges for Teaching and Teacher Education. Monterrey: ICMI and IASE.
Chernoff, E. J. (2013). Probabilistic relativism: A multivalentological investigation of normatively incorrect relative likelihood comparisons. Philosophy of Mathematics Education Journal, 27, 1-30.
Chernoff, E. & Sriraman, B. (Eds.) (2014). Probabilistic thinking: presenting plural perspectives. Advances in Mathematics Education (Vol. 7). New York: Springer.
Cobb, G.W. (2007). The introductory statistics course: A Ptolemaic curriculum? Technology Innovations in Statistics Education, 1(1).
de Finetti, B. (1937/1992). La prévision: ses lois logiques, ses sources subjectives. Annales Institut Henri Poincaré, 7, 1-68 (1937); English translation: Foresight: Its logical laws, its subjective sources. In S. Kotz, & N. L. Johnson (Eds.), Breakthroughs in statistics (pp. 134-174). New York, Berlin: Springer.
Fischbein, E. (1975). The intuitive sources of probabilistic thinking in children. Dordrecht: Reidel.
Fischbein, E. (1987). Intuition in science and mathematics. Dordrecht: Reidel,
Freudenthal, H. (1972). “The empirical law of large numbers” or “The stability of frequencies”. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 4(4), 484-490.
Gigerenzer, G. (2002). Calculated risks: How to know when numbers deceive you. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Jones, G. A., Langrall, C.W., & Mooney, E. S. (2007). Research in probability: Responding to classroom realities. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning, Vol. 2 (pp. 909-956). Greenwich, CT: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Information Age Publishing.
Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kapadia, R., Borovcnik, M. (Eds.) (1991). Chance encounters. Probability in education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kolmogorov, A. N. (1933/1956). Grundbegriffe der Wahrscheinlichkeitsrechnung. Berlin; English translation: Foundations of the theory of probability. New York: Chelsea.
Lecoutre, M. P. (1992). Cognitive models and problem spaces in “purely random” situations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 23(6), 557-568.
Simons, P. R. (1984). Instructing with analogies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(3), 513–527.
Spiegelhalter, D. (2014a). Comments on probabilistic thinking. In: E. J. Chernoff & B. Sriraman (Eds.), Probabilistic thinking: presenting plural perspectives (Back cover). New York: Springer.
Spiegelhalter, D. (2014b, April). What can education learn from real-world communication of risk and uncertainty? Invited lecture at the Eight British Congress on Mathematical Education, Nottingham.
Steinbring, H. (1991). The theoretical nature of probability in the classroom. In: R. Kapadia & M. Borovcnik (Eds.). Chance encounters (pp. 135-167). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Székely, G. J. (1986). Paradoxes in probability and mathematical statistics. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Vancsó, Ö. (2009). A parallel discussion of classical and Bayesian ways as an introduction to statistical inference. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 4(3), 291–322.
Vancsó, Ö. (2018, July). How visualisation using software helps understanding classical and Bayesian statistics. Invited paper in session 6C “Teaching Probability in School – Understanding and Linking it to Statistics.” ICOTS 10, Kyoto, 8-13 July, 2018. Online: www.researchgate.net/profile/Oedoen_Vancso.
von Plato, J. (1994). Creating modern probability: its mathematics, physics and philosophy in historical perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2020 Zetetike
Downloads
