Palabras clave
Trastorno del espectro autista
Alta tecnología
Revisión sistemática
Cómo citar
Resumen
Cerca de un tercio de los individuos diagnosticados con trastorno del espectro autista (TEA) no pueden desarrollar la oralidad. Los beneficios de la Comunicación Alternativa (CA) para personas con TEA son bien reconocidos y pueden ser usados para ampliar el habla limitada o actuar alternativamente como el método de comunicación principal. Entre los dispositivos de generación de habla encontramos una variedad de soluciones de alta tecnología, incluyendo dispositivos de comunicación electrónica dedicados (comunicadores/vocalizadores), procesadores de texto con voz sintetizada y dispositivos móviles multifunción (por ejemplo, iPad, iPod y tablets con sistema Android) con aplicaciones de CA; todos ellos son opciones viables para los individuos con autismo. El objetivo de este artículo es analizar os estudios que aplicaron a alta tecnología para comunicación y TEA, publicados en el Augmentative and Alternative Communication Journal, que es el periódico oficial de la Sociedad Internacional de Comunicación Aumentativa y Alternativa (ISAAC), durante el período de 2011 a 2018. Esta es una nueva área de conocimiento que está en rápido crecimiento y con pocos estudios en Brasil. Los resultados de los 15 artículos analizados indican que las personas con TEA se benefician con el uso de la alta tecnología. Las investigaciones futuras en la creación de recursos de comunicación, la intervención con los usuarios y la descripción de los repertorio verbales se recomiendan.
Citas
ACHMADI, Donna et al. Undergraduates’ perceptions of three augmentative and alternative communication modes. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, v. 18, n. 1, p. 22–25, 2015.
ALZRAYER, Nouf M.; BANDA, Devender R.; KOUL, Rajinder. Teaching children with autism spectrum disorder and other developmental disabilities to perform multistep requesting using an iPad. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, v. 33, n. 2, p. 65-76, 2017.
AMERICAN PSYCHIATRIC ASSOCIATION - APA. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-V). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2013.
BEUKELMAN, David R.; MIRENDA, Pat. Augmentative and alternative communication: supporting children and adults with complex communication needs. 4th ed. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co, 2013.
BOESCH, Miriam C. et al. Comparative efficacy of the picture exchange communication system (pecs) versus a speech-generating device: effects on social-communicative skills and speech development. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, v. 29, n. 3, p. 197-209, 2013.
BONDY, Andy; FROST, Lori. PECS: the picture exchange communication system training manual. Cherry Hill, NY: Pyramid Educational Consultants, 1994.
CANELLA-MALONE, Helen; DEBAR, Ruth M.; SIGAFOOS, Jeff. An examination of preference for augmentative and alternative communication devices with two boys with significant intellectual disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, v. 25, n. 4, p. 262–273, 2009.
CARON, Jessica et al. Effects of dynamic text in an AAC app on sight word reading for individuals with autism spectrum disorder. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, v. 34, n. 2, p. 143-154, 2018.
CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION - CDC. Prevalence of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years - Autism and Developmental Disabilities Monitoring Network. MMWR Surveillance Summary, United States, v. 63, p. 1–21, 2014.
DONATO, Cynthia; SPENCER, Elizabeth; ARTHUR-KELLY, Michael. A critical synthesis of barriers and facilitators to the use of AAC by children with autism spectrum disorder and their communication partners. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, v. 34, n. 3, p. 242-253, 2018.
FLORES, Margaret et al. A comparison of communication using the Apple iPad and a picture-based system. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, v. 28, n. 2, p. 74-84, 2012.
GANZ, Jennifer B. AAC interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: state of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, v. 31, n. 3, p. 203-214, 2015.
GANZ, Jennifer B. et al. High-technology augmentative and alternative communication for individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities and complex communication needs: a meta-analysis. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, v. 33, n. 4, p. 224-238, 2017.
GANZ, Jennifer B. et al. A meta-analysis of single case research studies on aided augmentative and alternative communication systems with individuals with autism spectrum disorders. Journal Autism Dev Disord, v. 42, n. 1, p. 60-74, 2012.
GENC-TOSUN, Derya; KURT, Onur. Teaching multi-step requesting to children with autism spectrum disorder using systematic instruction and a speech-generating device. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, v. 33, n. 4, p. 213-223, 2017.
GILLESPIE-SMITH, Karri; FLETCHER-WATSON, Sue. Designing AAC systems for children with autism: evidence from eye tracking research. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, v. 30, n. 2, p. 160-171, 2014.
KAGOHARA, Debora M. et al. Using iPodsand iPadsin teaching programs for individuals with developmental disabilities: a systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, v. 34, p. 147–156, 2013.
KASARI, Connie et al. Communication interventions for minimally verbal children with autism: A sequential multiple assignment randomized trial. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, v. 53, p. 635–646, jun. 2014.
LIGHT, Janice; MCNAUGHTON, David. Putting People First: re-thinking the role of technology in augmentative and alternative communication intervention. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, v. 29, n. 4, p. 299-309, 2013.
LIGHT, Janice; MCNAUGHTON, David. The changing face of augmentative and alternative communication: past, present, and future challenges. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, v. 28, n. 4, p. 197-204, 2012.
LIGHT, Janice; MCNAUGHTON, David; CARON, Jessica. New and emerging AAC technology supports for children with complex communication needs and their communication partners: state of the science and future research directions. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, v. 35, n. 1, p. 26-41, 2019.
MEER, Larah et al. Teaching multi-step requesting and social communication to twochildren with autism spectrum disorders with three AAC options. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, v. 29, n. 3, p. 222-234, 2013.
MORIN, Kristi L. et al. A systematic quality review of high-tech AAC interventions as an evidence-based practice. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, v. 34, n. 2, p. 104-117, 2018.
RYAN, Stephen E. et al. Responsiveness of a parent-reported outcome measure to evaluate AAC interventions for children and youth with complex communication needs. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, v. 34, n. 4, p. 348-358, 2018.
SCHLOSSER, Ralph W.; KOUL, Rajinder K. Speech output technologies in interventions for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: a scoping review. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, v. 31, n. 4, p. 285-309, 2015.
SCHLOSSER, Ralph W.; WENDT, Oliver. Effects of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on speech production in children with autism: a systematic review. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, v. 17, p. 212–230, 2008.
SCHLOSSER, Ralph W. et al. Implementing Directives that involve prepositions with children with autism: a comparison of spoken cues with two types of augmented input. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, v. 2, n. 2, p. 132–145, 2013.
STEPHENSON, Jennifer. Using the Choiceboard Creator™ app on an iPad© to teach choice making to a student with severe disabilities. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, v. 32, n. 1, p. 49-57, 2016.
STEPHENSON, Jennifer; LIMBRICK, Lisa. A review of the use of touch-screen mobile devices by people with developmental disabilities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, v. 45, n. 12, p. 3777-3791, 2015.
STILL, Katharine et al. Facilitating requesting skills using high-tech augmentative and alternative communication devices with individuals with autism spectrum disorders: a systematic review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, v. 8, p. 1184–1199, 2014.
TROTTIER, Nadine; KAMP, Lorraine; MIRENDA, PAT. Effects of peer-mediated instruction to teach use of speech-generating devices to students with autism in social game routines. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, v. 27, n. 1, p. 26–39, 2011.
A ETD - Educação Temática Digital utiliza a licença do Creative Commons (CC), preservando assim, a integridade dos artigos em ambiente de acesso aberto.
Descargas
