Banner Portal
Bloom Taxonomy as an instrument for teaching-learning of stereographic projection on geology
Camadas rítmicas da Formação Irati, Permiano da Bacia do Paraná
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Structural geology
Meaningful learning
Three dimensional visualization
Cognitive development.

How to Cite

MIGUEL, Gisele Francelino; CARNEIRO, Celso Dal Ré. Bloom Taxonomy as an instrument for teaching-learning of stereographic projection on geology. Terræ Didatica, Campinas, SP, v. 15, p. e019041, 2019. DOI: 10.20396/td.v15i0.8657522. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/td/article/view/8657522. Acesso em: 20 may. 2024.

Abstract

Developing the ability to give meaning and to characterize the geometric arrangement of rock structures is difficult for Geology students. When it is necessary to interpret movements and displacements, the barrier becomes even greater. The three-dimensional nature of geological structures stimulates the predominance of visual reasoning among geologists, along with the integration/association of various types of data. A challenge for Structural Geology teachers to create practical activities that facilitate and make learning more attractive was met by using stereographic projection. This work applies the Bloom taxonomy as a teaching-learning tool, from the perspective that the categories can facilitate the achievement of discipline objectives and clarify the practical activities, as well as contribute towards planning of contents, tasks and evaluation. Seeking to cope with students' difficulties, the authors developed and proposed categories in the three domains of Bloom's taxonomy for teaching of Structural Geology, focusing specifically on the content of stereographic projection.

https://doi.org/10.20396/td.v15i0.8657522
PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

Anastasiou, L. G. C.; Alves, L. P. (Orgs.) (2015). Processos de ensinagem na universidade: Pressupostos para as estratégias de trabalho em aula. 10ª ed. Joinville, SC: Univille.

Anderson, L. W.; Krathwohl, D. R.; Airasian, P. W.; Cruikshank, K. A.; Mayer, R. E.; Pintrich, P. R.; & Wittrock, M. C. (2000). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives (2sded). New York: Pearson.

Ausubel, D.; Novak, J. D.; & Hanesian, H. (1980). Psicologia educacional (2ª ed). Rio de Janeiro: Interamericana.

Ausubel, D. P. (2003). Aquisição e retenção de conhecimentos: Uma perspectiva Cognitiva. Lisboa: Plátano, Edições Técnicas.

Bloom, B. S. (1972). Innocence in education. The School Review, 80(3), 333-352.

Bloom, B. S. (Ed.) (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. 2nd ed. New York: Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd.

Chadwick, P. (1978). Some aspects of the development of geological thinking. Geology Teaching, 3, 142-148.

Dave, R. H. (1970). Psychomotor levels. In: R. J. Armstrong (Ed.) (1970). Developing and writing educational objectives. Tucson, AZ: Educational Innovators Press.

Ferraz, A. P. C. M.; & Belholt, R. V. (2010). Taxonomia de Bloom: revisão teórica e apresentação das adequações do instrumento para definição de objetivos instrucionais. Gestão & Produção, 17(2), 421-431. doi: 10.1590/S0104-530X2010000200015.

Frodeman, R. (2010). O raciocínio geológico: a geologia como uma ciência interpretativa e histórica. Trad. L.M. Fantinel & E.V.D. Santos. Terræ Didatica, 6(2), 85-99. doi: 10.20396/td.v6i2.8637460.

Frodeman, R. L. (1996). Envisioning the Outcrop. Journal of Geoscience Education, 44(4), 417-427. doi: 10.5408/1089-9995-44.4.417.

Galhardi, A. C.; & Azevedo, M. M. (2013, 9 e 10 de outubro). Avaliações de aprendizagem: o uso da taxonomia de Bloom. In: Anais do VIII Workshop de Pós-Graduação e Pesquisa do Centro Paula Souza. Sistemas produtivos: da inovação à sustentabilidade. ISSN: 2175-1897.

Harrow, A. J. (1972). A taxonomy of the psychomotor domain: A guide for developing behavioral objectives. New York: Addison-Wesley Longman Ltd.

Kastens, K. A.; Agrawal, S.; & Liben, L. S. (2009). How students and field geologists’ reason in integrating spatial observation from outcrop to visualize a 3-D geological structure. International Journal of Science Education, 31(3), 365-393. doi: 10.1080/09500690802595797.

Kastens, K. A; Pistolesi, L.; & Passow, M. J. (2014). Analysis of spatial concepts, spatial skills and spatial representation in New York State regents Earth Science examinations. Journal of Geoscience Education, 62(2), 278-289. doi: 10.5408/13-104.1.

King, C. (2008). Geoscience education: an overview. Studies in Science Education, 44(2), 187-222. doi: 10.1080/03057260802264289.

Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: an overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(4), 212-218. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2.

Krathwohl, D. R.; Bloom, B. S.; & Masia, B. B. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook II: The affective domain. New York: David McKay Company, Inc.

Mager, R. F. (1984). Preparing Instructional Objectives. 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Pitman.

Miguel, G. F. (2018). Visualização 3D como condição para aprendizagem significativa em Geologia Estrutural. Dissertação de Mestrado, Campinas, SP, Brasil, Instituto de Geociências, Universidade Estadual de Campinas. Recuperado de: http://repositorio.unicamp.br/bitstream/REPOSIP/334038/1/Miguel_GiseleFrancelino_M.pdf.

Miguel, G. F.; Carneiro, C. D. R.; Guimarães, G. A.; & Souza, J. J. P. (2018a). La proyección estereográfica como recurso para el desarrollo de la percepción espacial y el aprendizaje significativo en Geología Estructural. Enseñanza de las Ciencias de la Tierra, 26(2), 176-185. Recuperado de: https://www.raco.cat/index.php/ECT/article/view/338610.

National Research Council (2000). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School (Expanded Edition). Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Perrenoud, P. (1999a). Avaliação da excelência à regularização das aprendizagens: entre duas lógicas. Porto Alegre: Artmed.

Perrenoud, P. (1999b). Construir as competências desde a escola. Porto Alegre: Artmed.

Perrenoud, P. (2005, 12-14 Septembre). Développer des compétences, mission centrale ou marginale de l´université? Texte d´une conférence au Congrés de LÁssociation Internacionale de Pedagogia Universitaire (AIPU). Université de Genève.

Pombo, O. (1984). Pedagogia por Objectivos / Pedagogia com Objectivos. Logos, 1, 43-72. Lisboa: Filosofia Aberta.

Ragan, D. M. (2009). Structural Geology: An introduction to Geometrical Techniques (4 ed). USA: Cambridge University Press.

Ramsden, P. (2003). Learning to Teach in Higher Education. (2sded). Routledge.

Simpson, E. J. (1972). The Classification of Educational Objectives in the Psychomotor Domain. Washington, D.C: Gryphon House.

Thomas, K. (2004). Learning Taxonomies in the Cognitive, Affective and Psychomotor domains. Rocky Mountain Alchemy. Recuperado de: www.rockymountainalchemy.com/whitePapers/rma-wp-learning-taxonomies.pdf.

Vaughan, C. A. (1980). Identifying Course Goals: Domains and Levels of Learning. American. American Sociological Association, 7(3), 265-279. doi: 10.2307/1317141.

Waldron, J. (2009). Stereographic Projection. University of Alberta: Department of Earth and Atmospheric Science. EAS 233, Geologic Structures and Maps, Winter 2009.

Terrae Didatica utiliza a licença do Creative Commons (CC), preservando assim, a integridade dos artigos em ambiente de acesso aberto.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.