Banner Portal
How social media affords populist politics
PDF

Keywords

Populism
Social media
Post-truth
Liminarity

How to Cite

CESARINO, Leticia. How social media affords populist politics: remarks on liminality based on the Brazilian case. Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada, Campinas, SP, v. 59, n. 1, p. 404–427, 2020. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/tla/article/view/8658828. Acesso em: 19 jul. 2024.

Abstract

In the past decade or so, populism and social media have been outstanding issues both in academia and the public sphere. At this point, evidence from multiple countries suggest that perceived parallels between the dynamics of social media and the mechanics of populist discourse may be more than just incidental, relating to a shared structural field. This article suggests one possible path towards making sense of how the dynamics of social media and the mechanics of populist mobilization have co-produced each other in the last decade or so. Navigating the interface between anthropology and linguistics, it takes key aspects of Victor Turner’s notion of liminality to suggest some of the ways in which social media’s anti-structural affordances may help lay a foundation for the contemporary flourishing of populist discourse: markers of social structure are suspended; communitas is formed; the culture core is addressed; mimesis and anti-structural inversions are performed; subjects become influenceable. I elaborate on this claim based on Brazilian materials, drawn from online ethnography on pro-Bolsonaro WhatsApp groups and other platforms such as Twitter and Facebook since 2018. 

PDF

References

ANSELL, Aaron. (2018) Impeaching Dilma Rousseff: the double life of corruption allegations on Brazil’s political right. Culture, Theory and Critique. v. 59, pp. 312-331.

BATESON, Gregory. (1958) Naven: A Survey of the Problems suggested by a Composite Picture of the Culture of a New Guinea Tribe drawn from Three Points of View. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

BROWN, Wendy. (2019) In the ruins of neoliberalism: the rise of antidemocratic politics in the West. Nova Iorque: Columbia University Press.

CESARINO, Letícia. (2019a) On digital populism in Brazil. Political and Legal Anthropology Review – Ethnographic Explainers. Available at: https://polarjournal.org/2019/04/15/on-jair-bolsonaros-digital-populism/

CESARINO, Letícia. (2019b) Identidade e representação no bolsonarismo: corpo digital do rei, bivalência conservadorismo-neoliberalismo e pessoa fractal. Revista de Antropologia. v. 62, n. 3, pp. 530-557.

CESARINO, Letícia. (2020a) What the Brazilian 2018 elections tell us about post-truth in the neoliberal-digital era. Cultural Anthropology – Hot spots. Available at: https://culanth.org/fieldsights/what-the-brazilian-2018-elections-tell-us-about-post-truth-in-the-neoliberal-digital-era

CESARINO, Letícia. (2020b) Como vencer uma eleição sem sair de casa: a ascensão do populismo digital no Brasil. Internet & Sociedade. v. 1, n. 1, pp. 91-120.

COMAROFF, Jean; COMAROFF, John. (2004) Criminal obsessions, after Foucault: postcoloniality, policing, and the metaphysics of disorder. Critical Inquiry. v. 30, n. 4, pp. 800-824.

DAMATTA, Roberto. (1991) Carnivals, Rogues, and Heroes: An Interpretation of the Brazilian Dilemma. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

DAVIES, Will. (2018) Nervous States: How Feeling Took Over the World. London: Jonathan Cape, 2018.

DEIBERT, Ronald J. (2019) The Road to Digital Unfreedom: Three Painful Truths About Social Media. Journal of Democracy. v. 30, n. 1, pp. 25-39.

DOUGLAS, Mary. (1966) Purity and danger: an analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. New York: Routledge.

ENLI, Gunn. (2015) Mediated Authenticity: How the Media Constructs Reality. New York: Peter Lang.

EVANGELISTA, Rafael; BRUNO, Fernanda (2019) WhatsApp and political instability in Brazil: targeted messages and political radicalization. Internet Policy Review. v. 8, n. 4.

GERBAUDO, Paolo. (2018) Social media and populism: an elective affinity? Media, Culture & Society. v. 40, n. 5, pp. 1–9.

GIBSON, James. (1986) The theory of affordances. In: The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 127-137.

GLUCKMAN, Max. (1954) Rituals of Rebellion in South-East Africa. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

GRAAN, Andrew; HODGES, Adam; STALCUP, Meg. (2020) Fake news and anthropology: a conversation of technology, trust, and the publics in an age of mass disinformation. PoLAR Online Emergent Conversations: Part 9.

HALL, Kira; GOLDSTEIN, Donna; INGRAM, Matthew (2016) The hands of Donald Trump: entertainment, gesture, spectacle. Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory. v. 6, p. 2, pp. 71-100.

KELTY, Christopher. (2005) Geeks, Social Imaginaries, and Recursive Publics. Cultural Anthropology. v. 20, n. 2, pp. 185–214.

KUHN, Thomas. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

LACLAU, Ernesto. On populist reason. London: Verso, 2005.

LEMPERT, Michael. (2014) Imitation. Annual Review of Anthropology. v. 43, pp. 379-95.

LUHRMANN, Tanya. (2016) The paradox of Donald Trump’s appeal. Sapiens. https://www.sapiens.org/culture/mary-douglas-donald-trump/

MALY, Ico. (2018) Populism as a mediatized communicative relation: the birth of algorithmic populism. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies. v. 213. Available at: https://www.tilburguniversity.edu/sites/tiu/files/download/TPCS_213_Maly_2.pdf

MALY, Ico. (2019) New Right Metapolitics and the Algorithmic Activism of Schild & Vrienden. Social Media + Society. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119856700.

MARRES, Nootje. (2018) Why we can’t have our facts back. Engaging Science, Technology and Society. v. 4, pp. 423-443.

MAZZARELLA, William. (2017) The Mana of Mass Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

MAZZARELLA, William. (2019) The anthropology of populism: beyond the liberal settlement? Annual Review of Anthropology. v. 48, pp. 45-60.

MILLER, Daniel et al. (2016) How the World Changed Social Media. Londres: UCL Press.

MIROWSKI, Phillip. (2019) Hell is truth seen too late. Boundary 2. v. 46, n. 1, pp. 1-53.

MOUFFE, Chantal. (2000) The democratic paradox. London: Verso.

NAGLE, Angela. (2017) Kill All Normies: Online Culture Wars from 4chan and Tumblr to Trump and the Alt-Right. New York: Zero Books.

NEMER, David. (2019) A radicalização invisível da direita brasileira no WhatsApp. Huffington Post Brasil, August 20th.

PROCHÁZKA, Ondrej; BLOMMAERT, Jan. (2019) Ergoic Framing in New Right Online Groups: Q, the MAGA Kid, and the Deep State Theory. Tilburg Papers in Culture Studies, v. 224.

SILVA, Daniel. (in press) Enregistering the nation: Bolsonaro's populist branding of Brazil, In: Theodoropoulou & J. Woydack (eds) Language and Country Branding. London: Routledge, in print. Available at: https://www.academia.edu/39723047/WP252_Silva_2019._Enregistering_the_nation_Bolsonaros_populist_branding_of_Brazil

SINHA, Subir. (2017) Fragile Hegemony: Modi, Social Media, and Competitive Electoral Populism in India. International Journal of Communication. v. 11, pp. 4158-4180.

TURNER, Victor. (1970) Forest of symbols: aspects of Ndembo ritual. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

TURNER, Victor. (1969) Liminality and communitas, In: The Ritual Process: Structure and Anti-Structure. Chicago: Aldine Publishing, pp. 94-130.

WAGNER, Roy. (2016) The Invention of Culture. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

WAISBORD, Silvio. (2018) The elective affinity between post-truth communication and populist politics. Communication Research and Practice. v. 4, n. 1, pp. 17-34.

WALL, Travis; MITEW, Teodor. (2018) Swarm networks and the design process of a distributed meme warfare campaign. First Monday. v. 23, n. 5.

O periódico Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada utiliza a licença do Creative Commons (CC), preservando assim, a integridade dos artigos em ambiente de acesso aberto, em que:

  • A publicação se reserva o direito de efetuar, nos originais, alterações de ordem normativa, ortográfica e gramatical, com vistas a manter o padrão culto da língua, respeitando, porém, o estilo dos autores;
  • Os originais não serão devolvidos aos autores;
  • Os autores mantêm os direitos totais sobre seus trabalhos publicados na Trabalhos de Linguística Aplicada, ficando sua reimpressão total ou parcial, depósito ou republicação sujeita à indicação de primeira publicação na revista, por meio da licença CC-BY;
  • Deve ser consignada a fonte de publicação original;
  • As opiniões emitidas pelos autores dos artigos são de sua exclusiva responsabilidade.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.