Banner Portal
From Saussurean linguistics to social semiotics
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Multimodality
Ferdinand Saussure
Meaning construction
Social Semiotics

How to Cite

PINHEIRO, Petrilson. From Saussurean linguistics to social semiotics: the concept of multimodality under scrutiny. Trabalhos em Linguística Aplicada, Campinas, SP, v. 63, n. 2, p. 396–411, 2024. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/tla/article/view/8675669. Acesso em: 17 jul. 2024.

Abstract

This article aims to scrutinize the notion of multimodality through a theoretical discussion that seeks to re-present, problematize and reformulate concepts that underlie and support it, such as semiotic resource, semiotic element, semiotic system, modal affordance and semiotic modality. To do so, one starts from the concepts of language (both língua and linguagem), speech, sign, signifier and signified, by Ferdinand de Saussure (SAUSSURE, 2006 [1916]), and their reappropriation by Émile Benveniste (BENVENISTE, 1976 [1966]) and Roland Barthes (BARTHES, 1990 [1982]); then, one discusses more specifically the contributions from Gunther Kress and Theo van Leeuwen for social semiotics (KRESS & VAN LEEUWEN, 2006 [1996]; KRESS, 2010), so as to formulate a concept of multimodality based on premises that can establish criteria for semiotic modalities, not just to explain, in some way, the wide and (not rare) indiscriminate use of concepts and expressions in academic texts that are not very enlightening, but, above all, to theoretically contribute to the field of language studies and to the formulation of documents related to the area of Education, in which multimodality has been increasingly present.

PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

BARTHES, Roland. (1982). O óbvio e o obtuso. Rio de Janeiro: Nova Fronteira, 1990.

BENVENISTE, Émile. (1966). Problemas de Linguística Geral I. Trad. Maria da Glória Novak e Luiza Neri. São Paulo: Ed. da Universidade de São Paulo, 1976.

BRASIL. (2018). Ministério da Educação. Base Nacional Comum Curricular. Brasília.

CAZDEN, Courtney; COPE, Bill; FAIRCLOUGH, Norman; GEE, Jim; et al. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review; Spring, 66, n. 1.

HODGE, Robert; KRESS, Gunther. (1988). Social Semiotics, New York: Cornell University Press.

KALANTZIS, Mary; COPE, Bill; PINHEIRO, Petrilson. (2020). Letramentos. 1. ed. Campinas:Editora Unicamp.

HALLIDAY, Michael. (1978). Language as Social Semiotic: The Social Interpretation of Language and Meaning, Londres: Edward Arnold.

KRESS, Gunther. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London, Routledge.

KRESS, Gunther. (2010). Multimodality – A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication, Londres: Routledge.

KRESS, G Gunther; VAN LEEUWEN, Theo. (1990). Reading Images, Geelong, Deakin University Press.

KRESS, Gunther; VAN LEEUWEN, Theo. (1998). Front Pages: (The critical) analysis of newspaper layout. In: BELL, Allan; GARRET, Peter. (Org.) Approaches to media discourse. Blackwell Publishing, p. 186-219.

KRESS, Gunther; VAN LEEUWEN, Theo. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. Arnold: London.

KRESS, Gunther et VAN LEEUWEN, Theo. (2006 [1996]). Reading Images – The Grammar of Visual Design, London: Routdledge.

SAUSSURE, Ferdinand. (1916). Curso de linguística geral. Trad. de A. Chelini; J. P. Paes e I. Blikstein. 27ª Ed. São Paulo: Cultrix, 2006.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Petrilson Pinheiro

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.