Banner Portal
Classroom communication
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Communication in the math classroom
Inquiry-based math teaching
Teachers’ communicative actions.

How to Cite

GUERRERO, António; FERREIRA, Rosa Antónia Tomás; MENEZES, Luíz; MARTINHO, Maria Helena. Classroom communication: the perspective of inquiry-based mathematics teaching. Zetetike, Campinas, SP, v. 23, n. 2, p. 279–295, 2016. DOI: 10.20396/zet.v23i44.8646539. Disponível em: https://periodicos.sbu.unicamp.br/ojs/index.php/zetetike/article/view/8646539. Acesso em: 17 jul. 2024.

Abstract

This paper aims at answering to the challenge of thinking about the communication that occurs in the mathematics classroom. We disagree with the simplistic view of communication as a tool for knowledge transfer (from teacher to students); instead, we assume communication as a process of interaction, in which mathematical knowledge is socially constructed. Such a vision of communication in the mathematics classroom resonates with the processes of production and communication of mathematical knowledge that take place in the scientific field and the human community’s daily acting (when using mathematical ideas). Thus, changes are needed in mathematics teaching, particularly regarding the teacher’s and the students’ roles. Inquiry-based mathematics teaching is appointed as a privileged way to, supported by a set of fundamental communicative actions, create productive learning environments, which involve students’ work in challenging mathematical tasks, solving them and discussing the approaches taken, and culminate in the institutionalization of mathematical knowledge.
https://doi.org/10.20396/zet.v23i44.8646539
PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

Ainley, J. (1988). Perceptions of teachers’ questioning styles. Proceedings of PME XII (pp. I,92-99). Veszprém, Hungary: PME.

Antão, J. (2001). Comunicação na sala de aula. Porto: Edições Asa.

Bauersfeld, H. (1994). Theoretical perspectives on interaction in the mathematics classroom. In R. Biehler, R. Scholz, R. Sträßer & B. Winkelmann (Eds.), Didactics of mathematics as a scientific discipline (pp. 133-146). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Pub.

Beaudichon, J. (2001). A comunicação. Processos, formas e aplicações. Porto: Porto Editora.

Bishop, A., & Goffree, F. (1986). Classroom organization and dynamics. In B. Christiansen, A. Howson & M. Otte (Eds.), Perspectives on mathematics education (pp. 309-365). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.

Callahan, K. (2011). Listening responsively. Teaching Children Mathematics, 18(1), 286-305.

Canavarro, A. P. (2011). Ensino exploratório da Matemática: Práticas e desafios. Educação e Matemática, 115, 11-17.

Canavarro, A., Oliveira, H., & Menezes, L. (2012). Práticas de ensino exploratório da matemática: O caso de Célia. In L. Santos (Ed.), Investigação em Educação Matemática 2012: Práticas de ensino da Matemática (pp. 255-266). Portalegre, Portugal: SPIEM.

Cengiz, N., Kline, K., & Grant, T. J. (2011). Extending students’ mathematical thinking during whole-group discussions. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 14, 355-374.

Coles, A. (2001). Listening: A case study of teacher change. In M. van Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 2, pp. 281-288). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Freudenthal Institute.

Corrêa, R. (2005). Linguagem matemática, meios de comunicação e Educação Matemática. In A. Nacarato & C. Lopes (Orgs) Escritas e leituras na Educação Matemática (pp. 93-100). Belo Horizonte, Brasil: Autêntica.

Davis, B. (1996). Teaching mathematics: Towards a sound alternative. New York: Garland.

Davis, B. (1997). Listening for differences: An evolving conception of mathematics teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 28(3), 355-376.

Dillon, J. T. (1994). Using discussions in classroom. Buckingham Philadelphia: Open University Press.

Duval, R. (2006). Quelle sémiotique pour l’analyse de l’activité et des productions mathéma-tiques? Relime, Número Especial, 45-81.

Eco, U. (1997). O Signo. Lisboa: Editorial Presença.

Eco, U. (2002). Tratado geral de semiótica. São Paulo: Perspetiva.

Fiske, J. (2005). Introdução ao estudo da comunicação. Porto: Edições Asa.

Freixo, M. (2006). Teorias e modelos de comunicação. Lisboa: Instituto Piaget.

Godino, J. (2002). Un enfoque ontológico y semiótico de la cognición matemática. Recherches en Didactique dês Mathématiques, 22(2,3), 237-284.

Godino, J., & Llinares, S. (2000). El interaccionismo simbólico en educación matemática. Revista Educación Matemática, 12(1), 70-92.

Guerreiro, A. (2011). Comunicação no ensino-aprendizagem da matemática: Práticas no 1.o ciclo do ensino básico (Tese de Doutoramento, Universidade de Lisboa).

Habermas, J. (1998). O discurso filosófico da modernidade. Lisboa: Publicações Dom Quixote.

Hintz, A. (2011). Understanding students’ experiences as listeners during mathematical discus-sions. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 11(3), 261-272.

Joly, M. (2005). A imagem e os signos. Lisboa: Edições 70.

Lampert, M. (2001). Teaching problems and the problems of teaching. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Lasswell, H. (2009). A estrutura e a função da comunicação na sociedade. In J. Esteves (Org.) Comunicação e sociedade (pp. 51-62). Lisboa: Livros Horizonte.

Leinhardt, G. (2001). Instructional explanations: A common place for teaching and location for contrast. In V. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 333-357). Washington DC, USA: American Educational Research Association.

Mason, J. (1998). Asking mathematical questions mathematically. Actes du Colloque DIDIREM, Réussites et/ou apprentissages Nouvelles technologies; Les mathématiques en premier cycle universitaire, où en est-on? Université de Versailles. [disponível em http://www.math.jussieu.fr/~jarraud/colloque/mason.pdf]

Mason, J. (2000). Asking mathematical questions mathematically. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 31(1), 97-111.

Mason, J. (2010). Effective questioning and responding in the mathematics classroom. [disponível em: http://mcs.open.ac.uk/jhm3/Selected%20Publications/ Effective%20Questioning%20&%20Responding.pdf]

Menezes, L. (1995). Conceções e práticas de professores de matemática: Contributos para o estudo da pergunta (Dissertação de Mestrado, Universidade de Lisboa). Lisboa: APM.

Menezes, L., Guerreiro, A., Martinho, M. H., & Tomás Ferreira, R. A. (2013). Essay on the role of teachers’ questioning in inquiry-based mathematics teaching. Sysiphus, 1(3), 44-75.

Menezes, L., Oliveira, H., & Canavarro, A. P. (2015). Inquiry-based mathematics teaching: The case of Célia. In U. Gellert, J. Gimenez Rodriguez, C. Hahn & S. Kafoussi (Eds.), Educational paths to Mathematics (pp. 305-321). Cham: Springer.

Menezes, L., Tomás Ferreira, R., Martinho, M. H., & Guerreiro, A. (2014). Comunicação nas práticas letivas dos professores de Matemática. In J. P. Ponte (Ed.), Práticas profissionais dos professores de matemática (pp. 135-161). Lisboa: Instituto de Educação.

Nicol, C. (1999). Learning to teach mathematics: Questioning, listening, and responding. Edu-cational Studies in Mathematics, 37(1), 45-66.

Pirie, S., & Schwarzenberger, R. (1988). Mathematical discussion and mathematical understanding. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 19, 459-470.

Ponte, J. P. (2005). Gestão curricular em Matemática. In GTI (Ed.), O professor e o desenvolvimento curricular (pp. 11-34). Lisboa: APM.

Ponte, J. P. (2012). Estudiando el conocimiento y el desarrollo profesional del profesorado de matemáticas. In N. Planas (Coord.), Teoría, crítica y práctica de la educación matemática (pp. 83-98). Barcelona, España: Graó.

Rodrigues, A. (1990). Estratégias da comunicação. Questão comunicacional e formas de sociabilidade. Lisboa: Editorial Presença.

Ruthven, K., Hofmann, R., & Mercer, N. (2011). A dialogic approach to plenary problem synthesis. In B. Ubuz (Ed.), Proceedings of the 35th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (vol. 4, pp. 81-88). Ankara, Turkey: PME.

Sfez, L. (1991). A comunicação. Lisboa: Instituto Piaget.

Sherin, M. G. (2002). A balancing act: Developing a discourse community in a mathematics classroom. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5, 205-233.

Sierspinska, A. (1998). Three epistemologies, three views of classroom communication: Constructivism, sociocultural approaches, interactionism. In H. Steinbring, M. Bussi & A. Sierpinska (Eds.), Language and communication in the mathematics classroom (pp. 30-62). Reston: NCTM.

Stein, M. K. (2001). Mathematical argumentation: Putting umph into classroom discussions.Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 7(2), 110-112.

Stein, M. K., & Smith, M. S. (1998). Mathematical tasks as a framework for reflection: From research to practice. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3, 268-275.

Stein, M. K., Engle, R. A., Smith, M. S., & Hughes, E. K. (2008). Orchestrating productive mathematical discussions: Helping teachers learn to better incorporate student thinking. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 10(4), 313-340.

Tomás Ferreira, R. A. (2005). Portuguese mathematics student teachers’ evolving teaching modes: A modified teacher development experiment (Tese de Doutoramento, Illinois State University, EUA).

Voigt, J. (1985). Patterns and routines in classroom interaction. Recherches en Didactique dês Mathématiques, 6(1), 69-118.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2016 Zetetiké: Revista de Educação Matemática

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.